[quote name='IAmTheCheapestGamer']Actually I saw that post by Pliskin and I kinda did one of these: :shock: I mean, that was just full on KKK level racist shit in that post. Even I admit it on that one.
[/QUOTE]
What he posted, in his trademark way, is partially true (though no researcher would ever say it that way).
That there are race differences in measured IQ is a documented fact. The controversy stems from why those differences arise. According to the American Psychological Association, there is no adequate explanation that currently exists. There is no conclusive support for either genetic or environmental explanations. Essentially, it's still an open question.
In its simplest terms, it comes down to nature vs. nurture. If given the same structural characteristics as whites, would blacks perform on the same level in the usual metrics? It's oversimplified, I understand, but that's the gist of it.
If you want to have an easier life, you'll say it is environment. Some believe it is a mix of genetic and environmental factors. Hard mode is taking an all-genetic approach.
That IQ is correlated with things like success or wealth or whatever are relatively non-controversial. It might piss some people off but it won't personally destroy you like discussing race and IQ might.
Books like The Bell Curve have really been vilified over the years, even though it only had one chapter on race and intelligence and it is actually quite tame if you read it (there's also an audiobook). At the end of it all, they still say that it would be stupid to use any IQ results when treating individuals, and that individuals should be treated as individuals.
The existence of race differences in IQ does not support the idea of white supremacy, as Asians score higher than whites and there are a lot of blacks that are smarter than a lot of whites when you look at the distributions. So this idea that all whites are superior to all blacks is silly and not based in reality.
[/QUOTE]
What he posted, in his trademark way, is partially true (though no researcher would ever say it that way).
That there are race differences in measured IQ is a documented fact. The controversy stems from why those differences arise. According to the American Psychological Association, there is no adequate explanation that currently exists. There is no conclusive support for either genetic or environmental explanations. Essentially, it's still an open question.
In its simplest terms, it comes down to nature vs. nurture. If given the same structural characteristics as whites, would blacks perform on the same level in the usual metrics? It's oversimplified, I understand, but that's the gist of it.
If you want to have an easier life, you'll say it is environment. Some believe it is a mix of genetic and environmental factors. Hard mode is taking an all-genetic approach.
That IQ is correlated with things like success or wealth or whatever are relatively non-controversial. It might piss some people off but it won't personally destroy you like discussing race and IQ might.
Books like The Bell Curve have really been vilified over the years, even though it only had one chapter on race and intelligence and it is actually quite tame if you read it (there's also an audiobook). At the end of it all, they still say that it would be stupid to use any IQ results when treating individuals, and that individuals should be treated as individuals.
The existence of race differences in IQ does not support the idea of white supremacy, as Asians score higher than whites and there are a lot of blacks that are smarter than a lot of whites when you look at the distributions. So this idea that all whites are superior to all blacks is silly and not based in reality.