I'm pretty sure if someone was following you, and made a threatening move ... you are very much in the right to DEFEND yourself... Meaning Martin had every right to stop the threat being Zimmerman
However in Spooks racist understanding the black man must succumb to the lighter skin individual first, and fighting should be the very last resort... Kinda like the good old lynching days where blacks were hunted and hung and they had NO RIGHT to fight back..
I better some people would love to see that good old days to come back
Anyways according to certain conservative worldview, and possible some of the others here too...
They view the following groups as threats ( No. 1 being the highest to the larger the number lowest )
1. Muslims
2. Blacks
3. Hispanics
4. Asians
5.
6.
7.
1000. Whites ( see what I did there, its no coincidence or mistake )
So people like Spooker will always accept the fact that people like muslims and blacks DESERVE to be profiled first, followed, and forced to prove their innocence before being trusted or accepted. And any attempt for them to stand up for themselves is seen as a threat to their "white rule"... Thats the worldview he was harping about. That anyone of color have NO right to challenge the "white man code"
Since Zimmerman is closer to white, in his worldview and his scale of threat, Zimmerman gets the benefit of the doubt...
Not to mention why Obama scares the shit out of him 1. Muslim 2. Black... Obama tops the top two of dangerous groups in his mind....LOL
So according then to the liberal "worldview" (I love the liberal tactic of lumping whole groups of people, take away the individual and insert your own view into the collective viewpoint, and then promoting it as absolute) what would be the group threat of the ones you mention above? Where are whites, blacks, muslims, christians etc? Also tell me how any race would view other races in terms of threats, would they put their own race/religion first, last somewhere in between? Is there one race every race views as a threat? Does every race has a natural enemy? Is there any consistency? My honest opinion, anybody of any race, is going to think there race has the least threat to themselves and any other race/ religion is the devil, but I'm interested in what you have to say. Ask somebody of a particular race if they would rather live in a neighborhood consisting of mostly/all their race or another race and I think 99% of people will feel more comfortable around there own people, so by that logic everyone is racist or ethnocentric to some degree regardless of race, gender, religion or ideology.
Your whole posts reeks of the liberal view of conservatives, it's so nauseating to anyone rational that it makes you seem bitter and so one dimensional that nobody except those that share your "worldview" would take away anything from your posts but intolerance for others because it seems that all liberals see things in terms of black and white, there is no gray area, there is all or none. All conservatives are white Christian, KKK and all liberals are tolerant loving and champions of everyone except the so called majority white, which is not the case, whites are not the dominant race if ever they were.
I suggest you get over your condensending view of those who have different views than you and get educated about liberal ldealism and how backward SOME of their ideas are. And no I'm not threatened because I'm a white conservative Christian, but you guys need to be called out for your stupidity sometimes. I look forward to you answering my questions in the first paragraph.
Edit: I also find it Freudian? that you refer to Spokker as Spooker in a race rant when Spook is derogatory of blacks. Then again cracker and redneck seem common and fine when spoken against whites and are never condemened, but then again I always prefer honky, because Honky Tonk Man was the shit back in the day.
And just to stay relevant to the topic, was it just the white half of George Zimmerman that is to blame or should we also spew some venom to Hispanics?
ING EL.
