[quote name='randomdud']My long term group for gamesharing has been filled and we've concluded voting on our first round of games. We're picking up MAG, MAG starter DLC, Megaman 9+10, and Bionic Commando, with potential to add Pacman CE DX to the list.
PM me if you'd like to be on the back up list in case someone decides to drop out. Thanks, guys.
Also some feedback I'd like to leave- Kataztrophik is one heck of good guy and traded gameshares with me. Recommend him highly.
Munny1212- decent guy and didn't rip me off, though he may be a little lax on CAG's basic principles like the lower feedback party sending information first in a trade. He could have ripped me off, but he didn't though, so props to him.[/QUOTE]
That's the first I heard of this. Considering that feedback isn't supposed to be left for gameshares, I'm not convinced this is fair. (Looking at your 20 feedback, many of your 20 transactions fit the description of game shares. Based on the "rules", those people shouldn't have left feedback.). I've completed many game shares here, but have 0 feedback. It doesn't mean I'm going to send my information first to someone who signs up and quickly completes a couple of feedback-generating transactions.
Which brings me to the inconsistency of the ratings. Whether it's called a PSN "group buy" or a "game share" or "Paypal for PSN game", it's the same thing. Trading one share for another share is still a game share. The guidelines on feedback need to be expanded. Next, they need to either a) delete any feedback for gameshare or b) permit feedback for gameshares across the board. Personally, I think there needs to be a feedback mechanism for gameshares.