[quote name='jaystaeb8']I too am going to complain about the ads. I have no problem with advertising and sponsorship of the CAGcast. In fact Foreplay's sponsorship is respectable, impressive and effective.
My gripe comes from the fact that it is the Navy. They don't belong in the CAGcast and if you think them sponsoring the CAGcast will lead to future and better endorsements, think again. The Navy would sponsor anything if it thought it might lead to 1 new recruit, they are a bottom feeder advertiser who would buy time anywhere that will offer it. If you want a spring board to better industry advertisers, selling time to the Navy is not the way to do it. The Navy thinks they will get recruits or they wouldn't have paid for the ads, so they must have had success with similar ad campaigns in the past. It pisses me off that you would help them exploit your listeners.
I refuse to do business with credit card companies that target students with "incentives" that virtually assure they will be owned by the credit card company for years after college. The fact that Citibank handles most student loans, then offers those clients a credit card that gives bonuses when used at electronics outlets and specific products like iPods and TVs pisses me off.
There is advertising then there exploitation, guess where I think the Navy ads fall.[/QUOTE]I have no problem with the Navy's ads, your gripe about the Navy sponsoring only because they think they can get new recruits, makes absolutely no sense. All advertisers have the same goal, to get you interested in their product, service, opportunity, etc. it is up to the listener to decide if it's right for them. Cheapy and Wombat don't have to take heat for not baby sitting CAG'S and keeping them away from the big bad Navy. It's up to the listener to research the pro's and con's and the B.S claims that the military makes to get you to sign up.