E3 2011: Sony edition. Conference starts at 8pm est/7pm cst!

2012.....but thats so far away! I think it should say everything about the MS vs Sony argument that some people love to have that Sony has shown game after game after game after game. You may not like Sony and you can try and argue that they arnt good games. But Sly 4, Resistance 3, Uncharted etc etc Sony is showing they have a damn solid line up.

Though unless the NGP comes in at a ridiculously low price or they have some amazingly huge reveal this is still Nintendos to lose.
 
[quote name='HeSaveDave']sly4? god this is horrible[/QUOTE]

But let me guess Halo 4 is good and everything else they is good right? :roll:
 
[quote name='HeSaveDave']sly4? god this is horrible[/QUOTE]

Please leave. Seriously.....you only play shooters and sports games or something?
 
Sony really didn't have to do much this year to have a better conference than Microsoft. They could have made a Little Big Planet level made out of human shit and it would have done the job. Good games so far, but nothing too crazy.
 
Dust doesn't look very interesting at all....I don't like it.....

Wait..Im watching one of those verizon DroidX ads and I couldn't tell the difference...
 
[quote name='Blackout']Sony really didn't have to do much this year to have a better conference than Microsoft. They could have made a Little Big Planet level made out of human shit and it would have done the job. Good games so far, but nothing too crazy.[/QUOTE]

True connectivity between pc and ps3 is too good to ignore. Sly 4 announcement was awesome. Seeing Bioshock Infinite looked tight.
The argument that Move is on par with Kinect at E3 is lame. We haven't had bouncing kids so far and over excited adults bouncing around like retards on stage like the MS conference.
At least there are more hardcore games using move as a OPTIONAL use instead of the only controller to use.

Agreed on the not too crazy deal. They didn't need to go there and flail around like some other conference today.
 
Dust looks like Planetside.. it's actually something my hardcore PC gaming friend would want to get into with the connectivity.

Ken Levine is BOMBING with his move apology.. STFU

Free Bioshock 1 with Infinite as a PS3 exclusive? NOIIICE!

But really... enough Move pushing...
 
I do not get why people are so against Move and Kinect. I am not the biggest motion gaming fan, but when done properly(Dance Central and Killzone)it can be amazing.

Motion gaming needs to be judged not on the simple fact that it exists, but is it being handled like MS who is just flooding the market with casual games(only a few of which are worth a damn at that)or like Sony who is doing casual games while at the same time offering up hardcore games that have the OPTION to use them.
 
I've never really gotten into Star Trek. It's never appealed to me. And considering I love Star Wars more than just about anything, that is a little wierd I guess.
 
[quote name='MSI Magus']I do not get why people are so against Move and Kinect. I am not the biggest motion gaming fan, but when done properly(Dance Central and Killzone)it can be amazing.

Motion gaming needs to be judged not on the simple fact that it exists, but is it being handled like MS who is just flooding the market with casual games(only a few of which are worth a damn at that)or like Sony who is doing casual games while at the same time offering up hardcore games that have the OPTION to use them.[/QUOTE]


Thank you! Move is OPTIONAL. MS is doing Wii2. Simple as that. Proven as fact by today's announcements.
I'm not against motion gaming either but when you got to make jam it down everyone's throat like MS or just briefly mention it like Sony has, that is where the distinction lies.
 
[quote name='MSI Magus']I do not get why people are so against Move and Kinect. I am not the biggest motion gaming fan, but when done properly(Dance Central and Killzone)it can be amazing.

Motion gaming needs to be judged not on the simple fact that it exists, but is it being handled like MS who is just flooding the market with casual games(only a few of which are worth a damn at that)or like Sony who is doing casual games while at the same time offering up hardcore games that have the OPTION to use them.[/QUOTE]

I'm not gonna lie, the Move is starting to win me over a litte bit. I might get it for Resistance 3, but Move needs to offer a little more to get me over the fence, but they are closer than I'd ever thought they would get.
 
[quote name='xmbri']Thank you! Move is OPTIONAL. MS is doing Wii2. Simple as that. Proven as fact by today's announcements.[/QUOTE]

I would not go that far. MS has offered up a unique experience where as Sony copy catted. However Sony has offered up ever increasing numbers of hardcore options where as MS has simply tried to eat Nintendos lunch.
 
why would sony try to get these lame third-party "exclusives"...
first, Bioshock Infinite with Bioshock... wow.
now, Battlefield 3 with 1943... are you fucking kidding me...

(i am being sarcastic, if you didn't get that)
 
Here we go, round 2 of Sony showing shit that we really do not need to see at E3 and shit that only exists because another division is forcing the gaming division to do stupid stuff.
 
[quote name='lordopus99']why would sony try to get these lame third-party "exclusives"...
first, Bioshock Infinite with Bioshock... wow.
now, Battlefield 3 with 1943... are you fucking kidding me...

(i am being sarcastic, if you didn't get that)[/QUOTE]

That's not nearly sarcastic enough. Hard to distinguish from people who legitimately think that way. Should've thrown in some over the top comments, like lamenting the lack of Home content....
 
Vita is a stupid name and immediatly makes me think of the fact that the DS beat the snot out of the PSP in the US. Also it was really funny when he announced partnering with AT&T and people in the audience laughed and booed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top