Girl faces child porn charges for sending pics of herself

[quote name='Irukandji']i wish girls would've texted me photos of themselves back when i was in highschool. this cell phone incident isn't shit compared to the 10,000,000 teenage attention whores on myspace. there are enough 15 year old sideboobs/cleveage on myspace to put the whole country in jail.[/quote]


When I was in high school our mobile phones didn't have cameras. I feel cheated.
 
I would need to review the evidence at hand before I could have an informed opinion on this matter.

If we're talking just titties then this isn't felony material. If there is no clit, you must acquit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reality's Fringe;4958474 said:
fucking crazy Puritan values in this country make these things into huge issues.
Click to expand...

Yeah, those damn pilgrims! They should've taken their "religious freedom" BS and gotten lost with those other prissy prudes from Roanoke.

Seriously though, I'm not surprised that the tax dollars of a place called "Licking County" goes into prosecuting sex-related cases of all types.
 
[quote name='strongpimphand']Seems simple to me! What's the difference between the 30ish year old creep who would want to view it and the 15 year slut who wants everyone to see it????[/QUOTE]

What's the difference between murder and suicide?

Camoor's completely right.
 
If anyone in here says that the 15 year old version of themselves who received these pictures wouldn't have shown/forwarded them to every one of their friends, they're lying.
 
[quote name='dafoomie']I would need to review the evidence at hand before I could have an informed opinion on this matter.

If we're talking just titties then this isn't felony material. If there is no clit, you must acquit.[/quote]


It's funny because I remember hearing a story recently that someone stole some breastfeeding photos of Jamie Lynn Spears and was trying to sell them or something. Then they said the person selling them would be charged with underage porn.

I found that hysterical since than means that in a court of law, someone was going to argue that breast feeding was a sexual act (which it isn't), which in turn means Jamie Lynn would have been guilty as well and that anyone else taking photos of anyone else in the world breast feeding would have been guilty of underage porn since the baby is under 18. :roll:

The real issue there was theft, extortion, and violation of privacy, yet moral crusaders went the shock route instead. Morons.
 
[quote name='strongpimphand']I'm glad she was charged

She's underage. She's sending out underage nude photos. This was willingly - she more than likely wasn't forced to send those out![/quote]

Then why are you glad? As you said, she's underaged. The child porn laws were created with the intent of 'protecting the children' from unwanted sexual contact up to and including rape. The fact that this is was an unforeseen loophole that circumvents the 'intent' doesn't negate the stupidity of its prosecution. Also, since she willingly distributed them herself, the 'unwanted' sexual contact is nonexistent (and don't tell me any of the 15 yr olds that she sent the pics to wouldn't want those pics... unless she's ugly).
Seems simple to me!
Click to expand...
It isn't simple.
What's the difference between the 30ish year old creep who would want to view it and the 15 year slut who wants everyone to see it????
Click to expand...
Nothing. Which is why a lot of people feel that the sex offender laws as they currently are need to be changed to be flexible enough to prosecute actual cases of child abuse vs. normal teen stupidity. My neighbor's son (currently 26) is a registered sex offender for having sexual intercourse w/ a minor. Funny thing though. The person he 'abused', he's married to now and here's the kicker, she married him, not because he got her pregnant (he didn't), but because she actually loved the guy. When it happened, he was 18 and she was 16 and in a state where the age of consent was 17. They were making out in his car when a cop pulls by and catches them. Now, he's legally required to inform all people around him that he's a registered sex offender. Unfortunately, most people don't bother asking about the details (that's where the devil is) and immediately shut the door concluding automatically that he's a pedo.
And I feel if the people REQUESTED the photo(s), they should be charged too! Child porn laws are there for a reason. Next thing you know those photos would get posted on some myspace account with creeps viewing it and tracking this girl down!
Click to expand...
Yeah, child porn laws are there for a reason. This isn't it. And good luck trying to prove in court that people requested the photos. Unless there's solid documentation of the request, any lawyer worth his salt would easily get that thrown out on hearsay.
Convict her, make her pick up trash or serve food at a shelter, and do the same to anyone willingly wanting to view the photos (those who just had it sent ot them randomly should get off free....because they had no idea of it)
Click to expand...
And that's the thing. If they convict her & make an example of her, they're going to do it as an adult. And she will also be required to be registered as a sex offender. And this will follow her forever. This is not a DUI or a bar fight that she can laugh off when she's older. This is a stupid 15 yr old's mistake. She didn't kill anyone. She didn't rape anyone. When she's 53 and a grandmother, she'll still be required by law to inform her neighbors and they'll still come to the conclusion that she's a pedo thanks to the public shaming via the sex offender laws. And that will make life miserable for her & her family. Yes, punish her. But let the punishment fit the crime. The way it stands right now, the punishment is grossly disproportionate to the crime.
 
[quote name='jaykrue']Then why are you glad? As you said, she's underaged. The child porn laws were created with the intent of 'protecting the children' from unwanted sexual contact up to and including rape. The fact that this is was an unforeseen loophole that circumvents the 'intent' doesn't negate the stupidity of its prosecution. Also, since she willingly distributed them herself, the 'unwanted' sexual contact is nonexistent (and don't tell me any of the 15 yr olds that she sent the pics to wouldn't want those pics... unless she's ugly).
It isn't simple. Nothing. Which is why a lot of people feel that the sex offender laws as they currently are need to be changed to be flexible enough to prosecute actual cases of child abuse vs. normal teen stupidity. My neighbor's son (currently 26) is a registered sex offender for having sexual intercourse w/ a minor. Funny thing though. The person he 'abused', he's married to now and here's the kicker, she married him, not because he got her pregnant (he didn't), but because she actually loved the guy. When it happened, he was 18 and she was 16 and in a state where the age of consent was 17. They were making out in his car when a cop pulls by and catches them. Now, he's legally required to inform all people around him that he's a registered sex offender. Unfortunately, most people don't bother asking about the details (that's where the devil is) and immediately shut the door concluding automatically that he's a pedo.
Yeah, child porn laws are there for a reason. This isn't it. And good luck trying to prove in court that people requested the photos. Unless there's solid documentation of the request, any lawyer worth his salt would easily get that thrown out on hearsay.
And that's the thing. If they convict her & make an example of her, they're going to do it as an adult. And she will also be required to be registered as a sex offender. And this will follow her forever. This is not a DUI or a bar fight that she can laugh off when she's older. This is a stupid 15 yr old's mistake. She didn't kill anyone. She didn't rape anyone. When she's 53 and a grandmother, she'll still be required by law to inform her neighbors and they'll still come to the conclusion that she's a pedo thanks to the public shaming via the sex offender laws. And that will make life miserable for her & her family. Yes, punish her. But let the punishment fit the crime. The way it stands right now, the punishment is grossly disproportionate to the crime.[/QUOTE]
when you think about it, the requesting of the photos should be the easiest!

person A sends a text message to this female asking for the pic

that is a request and would hold up just like a text message from a junkie to his buyer
 
[quote name='jaykrue']It isn't simple. Nothing. Which is why a lot of people feel that the sex offender laws as they currently are need to be changed to be flexible enough to prosecute actual cases of child abuse vs. normal teen stupidity. My neighbor's son (currently 26) is a registered sex offender for having sexual intercourse w/ a minor. Funny thing though. The person he 'abused', he's married to now and here's the kicker, she married him, not because he got her pregnant (he didn't), but because she actually loved the guy. When it happened, he was 18 and she was 16 and in a state where the age of consent was 17. They were making out in his car when a cop pulls by and catches them. Now, he's legally required to inform all people around him that he's a registered sex offender. Unfortunately, most people don't bother asking about the details (that's where the devil is) and immediately shut the door concluding automatically that he's a pedo.[/quote]

As Dave Chappelle posited: "how old is 15 really"?
 
[quote name='niceguyshawne']Like it or not, this is a legitimate case. While I don't agree with prosecuting those that received the photos unless it can be proven that they solicited or further distributed them, she did produce illegal material that could potentially fall into the wrong hands.

What is the difference between this and an enterprising 15 year old with a camera taking self pictures and selling them? Is it okay as long as it is a picture of himself/herself?

While this person shouldn't be tried as an adult or have to register as a sex offender, some type of punishment is warranted in order to deter the practice.[/QUOTE]


Co-sign
 
Thiz B SRSZ biz lol


Were the girl managers cute? If so I wish I was on that basketball team.

[quote name='GuilewasNK']It isn't just these days.

I was living in North Dakota when in the 7th grade. We went to Bismarck for a track meet, while there there was a guy and girl in the back of the van and she was giving him head.

When I was in 9th grade I was on the basketball team and we had to go to Bismarck again for a tournament. Almost everyone stayed at teh same hotel except me, because I stayed at the same one my family did. One of the cheerleaders, a daughter of the vice-principal, was giving head to one of my teammates at the other hotel. The only reason I found out about it is because the coach did.

This was 1989-1991.

In my sophomore year in high school in Maryland on guy brought porno tapes to watch while we were in a study room before basketball practice. Also that year, the girls that were team managers and that taped our ankles would do so with no bras on so you could see everything as they bent over to tape, and they rubbed their breasts over our legs when they did it.

That was 1992-93.

If people don't think kids are interested in sex they are either naive, stupid or both.[/quote]


and :lol: to

[quote name='help1']Pics of the girl (with her clothes on):
hansen.jpg
[/quote]
 
[quote name='strongpimphand']when you think about it, the requesting of the photos should be the easiest!

person A sends a text message to this female asking for the pic

that is a request and would hold up just like a text message from a junkie to his buyer[/quote]

That's only on the assumption that they requested pics electronically. If she sent these to people she knew, since she's in high school, chances are, they are people she knows from school. Those people could have easily requested the pics while talking to each other between classes. And then it becomes a case of "he said, she said" which is why it will be thrown out on hearsay.
 
[quote name='PR Mega X']I'm relieved to come into this thread and see that no one has declared "Pics or it didn't happen".[/quote]

Pics or it didn't happen ;)
 
[quote name='joshythegreat18']What's up with all the little sluts lately? It's sad what this world is coming to.[/quote]

Sad you aren't 15 or sad girls didn't have camera phones when you were 15?

Also, pix or it didn't happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top