[quote name='Squarehard']Well, the issue is that you have to figure in that shipping is $7 for 3 items, so for cheaper items 25% off for cheaper games will be the better deal, which is basically what that huge table of math was trying to say, but we're talking like dirt cheap games such as $3-$4 games, and also you have the option to not pick up 3 games, or you can do a purchase that is not in multiple of 3s.
Basically if shipping was not involved, of course B2G1 for $1 would be better, but as it stands, the shipping throws the balance off depending on what price point combination you decide to go with.
That's what he was trying to say.[/QUOTE]
And actually shipping wasn't the focus of this question. But it does raise other questions. Would you be required to pay for shipping of the 3rd game even during B2G1$1. Because if you do (as I'm suspecting you would), Shipping would be a fixed cost whether it be this week or last week. If not, you're looking at a new equation all together! As a side note to the shipping I'd be forced to ask would you be required to pay tax for that 3rd game? If so the equations stand, if not they fall as the "25% off" payer would be paying an additional charge (7-10% depending on where you are, and after recalculating isn't THAT big of a difference: roughly 40 cents) for the 3rd game. So I'll concede the equations are probly off by that much.
And of course everything we've been saying would be debunked if you wanted to get into marginal utility ("how much this game is worth to me in comparison to how much I'm paying for it") so I ask those of you who are aiming to poke holes in the logic/math to concede that everyone is wrong
Hooray beer.
