WWE just released their quarterly statement a week or so ago. Weak performance comparatively, but their cost-cutting measures have smartly kept them profitable.
Don't they typically start cutting the roster after they do that?
Now I know WWE/Vince allegedly couldn't stand Charlie Haas ("rather watch paint dry" is what my memory tells me), so this is not at all shocking. I think Charlie Haas is a decent wrestler, and consider myself a very, very fortunate person in that I got to see the Haas Brothers wrestle as a tag team, and was present at the HWA shows shortly after Russ' untimely passing. Even though I have that kind of limited (as a fan, of course) emotional bond, I think the question to ask is this:
If you had TNA's roster that they do now, would you add Charlie Haas to it? Make a convincing argument why he's needed.