[quote name='Ryuukishi']I go back and forth on that idea.
On the one hand, I imagine BioWare being like, "Hey, corporate overlords, instead of just doing things in a safe and proven way, we have this great idea for an artistic, experimental conclusion to our space opera series. It's going to piss off a lot of our most loyal fans, and probably jeopardize future DLC and sequel sales, but it's going to be a really cool meta-narrative experiment! Great idea, right?" Yeah, NO.
On the other hand, if it was sold as something that would generate a lot of controversy and publicity for the game, and the detrimental effect on fan loyalty was downplayed, and they compared themselves to Kojima and noted that the Metal Gear Solid series did shit like this all the time and it's remembered as daring and boldly artistic... maybe EA would sign off on the idea.
Mostly I think they just genuinely didn't realize how badly they were missing the point and how controversial this would really be.[/QUOTE]
Your first point would illustrate something that could very well have happened. At that point in time, BioWare had already had several successful projects under their belt and EA trusted them fully. It wouldn't surprise me if this was the case. Of course, it would show just how idiotic they are but hey, who am I to say what's smart and what's stupid? I'm just a loyal fan. Their core audience.
But it's your second idea that scares me the most. That EA gave them the go ahead (sad that they would need it since they're OWNED) to do garbage like that and them believing they've earned the right to do it, just shows how out of touch they are with their fanbase or simply don't care.
And I'm not really sure which is worse because one of them is, at least, partially true. Whatever the case, just another reason they shouldn't have sold themselves out to EA. Perfectly fine with having them publish, but to own? Not by the worst company in America (as voted on by fans!).