Man, what did I start??
I'm not making commentary about the American man strictly because of this incident; as a matter of fact, the comment that made me say what I did was Strell's about the news reports concerning the "bystander effect", as PhrostByte calls it. And (GTzero) your supposition that the majority of men would actually do something is, at least according to certain studies, being proved as incorrect.
The things I expressed are, in my opinion and experience, very true. Whether or not you agree is probably based on your own experience. I believe men have been emasculated by society, I believe our natural male responses and inclinations are suppressed by what is deemed "politically correct", and as a result, I believe we have been weakened as a group.
As for me personally, (CoffeeEdge) I can say definitively that I would take action. I have taken action before. I came upon two young guys beating the hell out of this other guy, stomping him into the ground, and I jumped right in and scared them off. Why did I do that? It's not because I am spectacular or valorous or brave, but because I simply did what any man should do: defend the weak. There is no heroism involved here, but a carrying-out of what is natural to a man.
Finally, to say that 90% of us would have ran to protect ourselves is an indicator of the sad perception of the public. I hope you're wrong, CoffeeEdge. But if you're right, then man it is good to be in the 10%.
I'm not making commentary about the American man strictly because of this incident; as a matter of fact, the comment that made me say what I did was Strell's about the news reports concerning the "bystander effect", as PhrostByte calls it. And (GTzero) your supposition that the majority of men would actually do something is, at least according to certain studies, being proved as incorrect.
The things I expressed are, in my opinion and experience, very true. Whether or not you agree is probably based on your own experience. I believe men have been emasculated by society, I believe our natural male responses and inclinations are suppressed by what is deemed "politically correct", and as a result, I believe we have been weakened as a group.
As for me personally, (CoffeeEdge) I can say definitively that I would take action. I have taken action before. I came upon two young guys beating the hell out of this other guy, stomping him into the ground, and I jumped right in and scared them off. Why did I do that? It's not because I am spectacular or valorous or brave, but because I simply did what any man should do: defend the weak. There is no heroism involved here, but a carrying-out of what is natural to a man.
Finally, to say that 90% of us would have ran to protect ourselves is an indicator of the sad perception of the public. I hope you're wrong, CoffeeEdge. But if you're right, then man it is good to be in the 10%.