[quote name='Soodmeg']Thats where I would disagree.
You have a giant
ing screen that shows a replay 2 seconds after it happens with at least 400 camera op's surrounding the court at any given second.
Why couldnt a coach simply say....hey I really want that last call checked out to make sure its right.
Honestly...The NBA stops more times for random bullshit than any other sport. You got 20's full's hell even a god damn timeout solely for the purpose of showing tv ads.
Your telling me in all that time you cant check a replay that is ready 2 seconds after it happened.
I honestly think all sports should be checked by replay. There is no reason not to. We have tech out of the ass that tracks these games. It would be very very easy to check on a call.[/quote]
You are right about all the stoppages. In this case, I don't think it's even about preserving the "flow of the game."
With all the contact that takes place on every play, most fouls boil down to being judgment calls. I have a major problem if challenges in the NBA involve reviewing (like you are suggesting) judgment fouls. That simply doesn't work. Then you've got to deal with problems such as views of the game (which will inevitably differ from ref to ref), all the commotion that will result from challenges from fans, coaches and players, the pride, for lack of a better term, of the referee causing him/her to not want to overturn the call, among many others. Replay isn't foolproof.
Challenges just wouldn't work in the NBA. There's a human component to officiating the game. What's so wrong about that? Refs are going to make mistakes. Like I said, it's no big deal-people gotta learn to move on.
Plus we gotta remember that this is probably the toughest pro sport to officiate. I certainly thought that Bryant had a clean strip in real time because of the way Pierce lost the ball. Of course it was wrong, but that's not as easy of a call to make as I think some people here believe.
Look at some other ways to improve officiating-challenges aren't the answer in the NBA.