The "Stay Classy, Republicans" Super Nintendo Chalmers Thread

dohdough;7906329If you think Sam Walton did it on his own said:
$20,000. In 1945.[/B] That's $243,000 today. And the FIL was a banker. A rich one. With a college educated daughter. In the fucking 1940's. Sam Walton didn't bootstrap shit. He did it the old fashioned way and married into money. So please, tell me more about those nice bootstraps that you're talking about.

I like this part. Where you completely ignore the fact that Sam Walton didn't get the loan until after he had shown his father-in-law that he had a sound business model. I like where you leave out that 20% of the initial costs were of Sam's own investment. I like where you completely skip over the fact that the initial $20,000 loan was, in fact, not the start of Walmart, but for Sam to start a Ben Franklin franchise. I like where you fail to mention that, not only did he pay back his loan in the first year, but he ran a very successful store that he sold for twice his initial buy-in - with out the option to really negotiate the price. It's fun when you leave out all those details.

If Myke's business plan is so uber-awesome, getting a loan, even in this economic environment, should be easier than getting a moron to hold an Obama sign. Hell, hit up Warren Buffet for a loan - he seems to have money to burn away.
 
[quote name='Clak']Well you didn't exactly answer the question, bob. doesn't matter if Myke can design one or not, the point is that there is at least one that does it, that alone proves it's possible to do. The fact that we didn't all study business doesn't mean we're wrong when there is proof out there.[/QUOTE]

Costco *hardly* is the socially responsible business you're holding them up to be. They source the same cheap plastic crap from China that Walmart does. You think moving up in Walmart is hard? Try moving up in Costco. The company is *very* seniority driven, very "good ol' boys". Hell, Costco has the same types of employment lawsuits against them as Walmart (although, admittedly, not as many... but when you only hire 1/10 th of the amount of employees, you're bound to have less).

Top ten places to work... #1 - Costco! Yay Costco!
http://www.careerbliss.com/press/top-ten-happiest-retailers/

A few slots down the list.... Sam's Club! Weird.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']I like this part. Where you completely ignore the fact that Sam Walton didn't get the loan until after he had shown his father-in-law that he had a sound business model. I like where you leave out that 20% of the initial costs were of Sam's own investment. I like where you completely skip over the fact that the initial $20,000 loan was, in fact, not the start of Walmart, but for Sam to start a Ben Franklin franchise. I like where you fail to mention that, not only did he pay back his loan in the first year, but he ran a very successful store that he sold for twice his initial buy-in - with out the option to really negotiate the price. It's fun when you leave out all those details.

If Myke's business plan is so uber-awesome, getting a loan, even in this economic environment, should be easier than getting a moron to hold an Obama sign. Hell, hit up Warren Buffet for a loan - he seems to have money to burn away.[/QUOTE]

Right. Any jerk-off off the street with a "good business plan" could get a loan for $20k in 1945. I told you to think; not vomit bullshit.

Which begs the question, where'd this "poor" SOB find $5,000 in 1945.

We're talking 19 fucking 45; not 1985. For once in your life think about the shit you're saying and put that shit you learned about the world in 1945 in high school to use.

Did you also forget to add employment practices from those stores and other shitty policies?

And how the fuck is some joker on the internet with no connections going to get a loan from Buffet to compete with Walmart. Its a simple business model to out Walmart, Walmart. Why the fuck do you think it hasn't happened yet. Once again, you're a fucking idiot.
 
Median income for white households in the US in 1945 was $2,379 - which translates to $28,906 in 2010 dollars (wow, that's low!).

So the $5,000 Walton had was more than double that - he saved double the median household annual income. Which would put him a hair short of $100,000 today. Can *you* bootstrap yourself to $100,000 in savings, Bob? And, above and beyond that, can you also secure a loan for $243,000?

Some fuckin' bootstrap story.

Can you do it by age 27? Did you?
 
[quote name='dohdough']Which begs the question, where'd this "poor" SOB find $5,000 in 1945.[/quote]

Savings. $5,000 in "1945 dollars" would be about $60,000. Anyone with a good work ethic, common sense and the ability to work with money should be able to save that much in 3-5 years.

Its a simple business model to out Walmart, Walmart. Why the fuck do you think it hasn't happened yet.

Well, since I'm too much of an idiot, I'll ask you - if it's such a simple business model to out Walmart Walmart, why hasn't anyone came along?

Which, of course, is completely beside the point. The point isn't to out Walmart Walmart, the challenge is to create a "socially conscious" business that is also successful. Because so many of you think it should be so easy to do. I want to see just one of you to create such a business.
 
Start small: Michael Duke doesn't need to earn $16,800 per hour.

Let that trickle down a bit.

Cap executive pay and benefits is the place to start. We're not rollin' out a whole business model just because you're putting words in our mouths and demanding it of us. Unless you think Wal-Mart is the greatest thing ever created by society, and no business model can improve on that.

Because even Wal-Mart itself doesn't believe that.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Median income for white households in the US in 1945 was $2,379 - which translates to $28,906 in 2010 dollars (wow, that's low!).

So the $5,000 Walton had was more than double that - he saved double the median household annual income. Which would put him a hair short of $100,000 today. Can *you* bootstrap yourself to $100,000 in savings, Bob? And, above and beyond that, can you also secure a loan for $243,000?

Some fuckin' bootstrap story.

Can you do it by age 27? Did you?[/QUOTE]

You might need to double-check that math.

$2,379 (1945) = $28,906 (2010)
$5,000 (1945) = $100,000 (2010)?

But to answer your question, if I had spent less money on candy and games and worked multiple jobs/joined up in the army, $60,000 in savings within five years isn't that crazy of a goal. Listen to Dave Ramsey and hear what people manage to pay off in debt when they work hard at it. Yes, I know the words "work" and "hard" aren't exactly something a lot of liberals like to hear.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Start small: Michael Duke doesn't need to earn $16,800 per hour.

Let that trickle down a bit.

Cap executive pay and benefits is the place to start. We're not rollin' out a whole business model just because you're putting words in our mouths and demanding it of us. Unless you think Wal-Mart is the greatest thing ever created by society, and no business model can improve on that.

Because even Wal-Mart itself doesn't believe that.[/QUOTE]

There is a lot of room for improvement in Walmart's business plan.

Yet, again, I don't see you putting over one million Americans to work every day. How many people do you directly employ, Myke?
 
Hey bob, is wal-mart still trying to get rid of plastic bags in the next few years or have they given that up?

[quote name='UncleBob']If Myke's business plan is so uber-awesome, getting a loan, even in this economic environment, should be easier than getting a moron to hold an Obama sign. Hell, hit up Warren Buffet for a loan - he seems to have money to burn away.[/QUOTE]

Warren also openly admitted that class warfare from the top has already won the monetary war.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']
Well, since I'm too much of an idiot, I'll ask you - if it's such a simple business model to out Walmart Walmart, why hasn't anyone came along?

Which, of course, is completely beside the point. The point isn't to out Walmart Walmart, the challenge is to create a "socially conscious" business that is also successful. Because so many of you think it should be so easy to do. I want to see just one of you to create such a business.[/QUOTE]

WM is just evil. That's why they haven't been outted yet. They control prices at the purchasing level. They demand a 55-65% profit margin, and if one business can't get it there, WM doesn't buy. I've seen it happen first hand with a small to medium business. Micheals' and Joann's of the world doesn't have that big of a profit margin, but WM demands it. And WM can, why, because they have a store in every damn dark crook and crany. It's captialism that starts with a Wal, and ends in mart. They are the lowest prices because they can bully the purchasing cost. I know you've got a bulk price, and discount on large orders, but not any other retailer and gloat on the WM discount strong-arming every Dick and Jane manufacturer.

damn... ok stopping.

anyways, I've been tyring to shop away from WM.
 
Employing over a million people ain't that special when they're part-time, low wage, 2/3 with zero benefits employees. I'd rather see those million people, as you might put it, bootstrappin' it themselves, running their own businesses (the ones that would pop up if no multinational big box stores existed) and doing more than abandoning their children and eating ramen. You act as if they'd be living on the dole if WM didn't exist, which is beyond fallacious. Ask thrustbucket, he's the one who thought the death of the US auto industry would have been great for the economy.

Dump the kids.
Eat ramen.

The American Dream!
 
Seems to me, that would make it almost easier to usurp Walmart. If I was selling something to someone who treated me like crap and someone else came up and wanted to buy what I was selling and not treat me like crap, wouldn't I be happy to sell to them?
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Seems to me, that would make it almost easier to usurp Walmart. If I was selling something to someone who treated me like crap and someone else came up and wanted to buy what I was selling and not treat me like crap, wouldn't I be happy to sell to them?[/QUOTE]

You don't understand monopsony.

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/102/open_snapper.html

One person said no; virtually all other companies were too afraid to see their sales dwindle by not being carried in the store that accounts for over 26% of all consumer transactions in the United States alone.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Savings. $5,000 in "1945 dollars" would be about $60,000. Anyone with a good work ethic, common sense and the ability to work with money should be able to save that much in 3-5 years.[/QUOTE]
F me, you're allergic to using your brain for any critical thinking. The average household income today for white families is a little more than $50k. So you're saying that the average household should be able to save from $12k to $20k a year. Not only that, but this douche was able to save more than twice, that's 2 times, 2x, the average income for 1945. True translation in current real dollars would actually be $100k+. Purchasing power per dollar is another important variable.

Well, since I'm too much of an idiot, I'll ask you - if it's such a simple business model to out Walmart Walmart, why hasn't anyone came along?

Which, of course, is completely beside the point. The point isn't to out Walmart Walmart, the challenge is to create a "socially conscious" business that is also successful. Because so many of you think it should be so easy to do. I want to see just one of you to create such a business.
I already told you to learn what a barrier to entry is. fucking figure it out or GTFO.

[quote name='UncleBob']You might need to double-check that math.

$2,379 (1945) = $28,906 (2010)
$5,000 (1945) = $100,000 (2010)?[/QUOTE]
He's using the current average household income as the equivalent of the average household income from 1945. It's not a difficult concept to grasp.

But to answer your question, if I had spent less money on candy and games and worked multiple jobs/joined up in the army, $60,000 in savings within five years isn't that crazy of a goal. Listen to Dave Ramsey and hear what people manage to pay off in debt when they work hard at it. Yes, I know the words "work" and "hard" aren't exactly something a lot of liberals like to hear.
Yeah, a black man in 1945 would have no problem doing exactly this.

[quote name='UncleBob']There is a lot of room for improvement in Walmart's business plan.

Yet, again, I don't see you putting over one million Americans to work every day. How many people do you directly employ, Myke?[/QUOTE]
And what is the cost of those 1 million people employed when you have products that are conciously chosen to be manufactured under labor conditions that would be illegal here? Or with horrible health coverage...or anti-union...or predatory...or a host of other negative things that impact millions more people negatively without even knowing.

Hiring 100 people at $8 is not the same as hiring 80 people at $100. Shit, there were over a million slaves that were fully employed. Is that a good thing too?
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Dump the kids.
Eat ramen.

The American Dream![/QUOTE]

Of course, the smarter thing is to not have kids you can't afford in the first place, but hind-sight is 20-20. You make tough choices. That's life. If you cannot support your children (which having three children with $50k in debt on a 20k salary, I have to say, you likely aren't doing a very good job supporting them) there is nothing wrong with admitting that you cannot provide the children with the life they need and finding someone else to take over that role. In fact, I dare say, it's the right thing to do.

I don't care to have an extra large savings of $50,000, so I eat out quite a bit. If I wanted to save up $50k, I could probably do that in 3 years just by swapping to Ramen. It's all about choices, priorities and self responsibility.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Seems to me, that would make it almost easier to usurp Walmart. If I was selling something to someone who treated me like crap and someone else came up and wanted to buy what I was selling and not treat me like crap, wouldn't I be happy to sell to them?[/QUOTE]

that's a nice one... let's play with numbers.

Walmart Stores 886 & Supercenters 2,622 = ~3500ish

Michaels 850
Joann's 755

That's just total, that doesn't include how many stores they actually want to put your product in. If you're selling fur coats in FL you're doing it wrong.

Selling to someone at almost 2.5 times as much versus the "competition" and you'll want to actually bend over and take it.

WM was probably at least 75% of the products sold only because of volume. #2 and #3 couldn't match the numbers, couldn't ask for the product at that level. Even if selling the same product at different profit margins, more is better even at a price cut. 1 million of a few bucks vs say 1000 at 5-10 bucks.. which one would you pick?
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Of course, the smarter thing is to not have kids you can't afford in the first place, but hind-sight is 20-20. You make tough choices. That's life. If you cannot support your children (which having three children with $50k in debt on a 20k salary, I have to say, you likely aren't doing a very good job supporting them) there is nothing wrong with admitting that you cannot provide the children with the life they need and finding someone else to take over that role. In fact, I dare say, it's the right thing to do.

I don't care to have an extra large savings of $50,000, so I eat out quite a bit. If I wanted to save up $50k, I could probably do that in 3 years just by swapping to Ramen. It's all about choices, priorities and self responsibility.[/QUOTE]
Yes, a diet of ramen will have absolutely no ill effects. So who's going to take care of you when you can't afford medication to control your hypertension, cholesterol, kidney problems, and other related health issues?

Your anecdote is disturbing on many levels, and I'm not even talking about the single mom at 19 part.

And I'd like you to find me rent for $100 a month cause it's something that anyone can do...AMIRITE
 
[quote name='dohdough']And what is the cost of those 1 million people employed when you have products that are conciously chosen to be manufactured under labor conditions that would be illegal here? Or with horrible health coverage...or anti-union...or predatory...or a host of other negative things that impact millions more people negatively without even knowing.

Hiring 100 people at $8 is not the same as hiring 80 people at $100. Shit, there were over a million slaves that were fully employed. Is that a good thing too?[/QUOTE]

Again, instead of sitting back and expecting everyone else to come forward and make the changes you want to see, why don't you put in the effort to change the system? I know, I know... "hard" and "work". It's so much easier to expect everyone else to do everything you want for you. Seems like there's a certain political party that's the perfect fit for that line of thinking. Maybe Obama should use that in 2012. "Can't someone else do it?"

Beyond that, if you cannot talk to me like a reasonable human being, then you need not bother to reply. I've continued to put up with your derogatory, flaming attacks directly at me, but, if it continues, then I will simply end this conversation. I know, I know, you don't even know why you're trying to talk to me in the first place, blah, blah, blah. Whatever.
 
[quote name='dohdough']And I'd like you to find me rent for $100 a month cause it's something that anyone can do...AMIRITE[/QUOTE]

Two bedroom apartment with utilities included for $350 here in Carmi. Find you two roommates and you're at just over $100/month. I'll even take you out to dinner sometime.
 
Stop acting as a child would. Instead of disputing facts, you scamper and bray "YOU DO IT BETTER THEN!" - and then bemoan when we present you with a superior business model. You never did answer whether or not you'd prefer to remain at WM or work at Costco given the opportunity. Why would you avoid answering such a question?

You dipped out of this conversation long ago; you do, however, continue to post in this thread. I hope you would recognize the difference.
 
[quote name='xycury']that's a nice one... let's play with numbers.

Walmart Stores 886 & Supercenters 2,622 = ~3500ish

Michaels 850
Joann's 755

That's just total, that doesn't include how many stores they actually want to put your product in. If you're selling fur coats in FL you're doing it wrong.

Selling to someone at almost 2.5 times as much versus the "compitition" and you'll want to actually bend over and take it.

WM was probably at least 75% of the products sold only because of volume. #2 and #3 couldn't match the numbers, couldn't ask for the product at that level. Even if selling the same product at different profit margins, more is better even at a price cut. 1 million of a few bucks vs say 1000 at 5-10 bucks.. which one would you pick?[/QUOTE]
For someone that works at Walmart and extols the virtues of his corporate owners, he sure doesn't seem to know how any business seems to work in regards to one of the most basic principles of bulk orders.
 
[quote name='xycury']that's a nice one... let's play with numbers.

Walmart Stores 886 & Supercenters 2,622 = ~3500ish

Michaels 850
Joann's 755

That's just total, that doesn't include how many stores they actually want to put your product in. If you're selling fur coats in FL you're doing it wrong.

Selling to someone at almost 2.5 times as much versus the "competition" and you'll want to actually bend over and take it.

WM was probably at least 75% of the products sold only because of volume. #2 and #3 couldn't match the numbers, couldn't ask for the product at that level. Even if selling the same product at different profit margins, more is better even at a price cut. 1 million of a few bucks vs say 1000 at 5-10 bucks.. which one would you pick?[/QUOTE]

It's funny you'd pick Michaels and Joann's. You know, since Walmart has eliminated piece goods out of most of their stores and has severely cut back on space allotted to crafts and fabrics. So, considering Walmart's decline in that category, if I supplied to that type of business, I'd have no problems focusing on the smaller stores.

But more to your point - you point out that the supplies choose to sell to Walmart (even though Walmart is all about the abusive relationship) just so these supplies can make a larger profit. Even though they could make the choice to sell to other retail channels, but just make less profit. So, because these supplies want to make more profit, Walmart is evil?
 
[quote name='dohdough']For someone that works at Walmart and extols the virtues of his corporate owners, he sure doesn't seem to know how any business seems to work in regards to one of the most basic principles of bulk orders.[/QUOTE]

He's probably just never witnessed the other side of things..... being at the opposite end of WM.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Stop acting as a child would. Instead of disputing facts, you scamper and bray "YOU DO IT BETTER THEN!" - and then bemoan when we present you with a superior business model. You never did answer whether or not you'd prefer to remain at WM or work at Costco given the opportunity. Why would you avoid answering such a question?

You dipped out of this conversation long ago; you do, however, continue to post in this thread. I hope you would recognize the difference.[/QUOTE]

I'm happy at my current job, thank you.
But do you really feel that Costco is the bright, shining beacon of goodness in the retail sales sector?
Sure, they may be "better" than Walmart, but if our entire retail business model was 100% designed like Costco, would you be happy?
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Again, instead of sitting back and expecting everyone else to come forward and make the changes you want to see, why don't you put in the effort to change the system? I know, I know... "hard" and "work". It's so much easier to expect everyone else to do everything you want for you. Seems like there's a certain political party that's the perfect fit for that line of thinking. Maybe Obama should use that in 2012. "Can't someone else do it?"[/QUOTE]

You haven't been paying attention to politics in the last 10 years...I can tell...

Beyond that, if you cannot talk to me like a reasonable human being, then you need not bother to reply. I've continued to put up with your derogatory, flaming attacks directly at me, but, if it continues, then I will simply end this conversation. I know, I know, you don't even know why you're trying to talk to me in the first place, blah, blah, blah. Whatever.
Lollerskates. I know exactly why I'm responding to you. It's because I call bullshit, bullshit...when it's bullshit. I have no problem whatsoever calling you out on your weak fallacious stances and failure to even reflect more than superficially on your own ideology. You can't even remember and put into context that the US was a shithole in the 1940's and that saving $5,000 was an insane amount of money back then.

Other members may be more tactful, but I've seen nothing worthy of anything more than snide remarks from me. I'm not here to change your mind about things. That's something you'll do on your own if you really wanted to, but I know you don't.

So you can book out whenever you like, but when you post some craziness like you've been doing, don't act suprised when people say you're crazy.
 
Oh, wow... Emmitt Perry Jr.
Grew up in an abusive home. Is a minority. Dropped out of High School. Worked low-wage jobs. Somehow, magically, saved up $12,000 at the age of 22, which eventually lead to him launching his own multi-million dollar media franchise.

But no, just a fairy tale. I mean, he's black, after all. A black man could never get that far in society. The white man would never let him.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']It's funny you'd pick Michaels and Joann's. You know, since Walmart has eliminated piece goods out of most of their stores and has severely cut back on space allotted to crafts and fabrics. So, considering Walmart's decline in that category, if I supplied to that type of business, I'd have no problems focusing on the smaller stores.

But more to your point - you point out that the supplies choose to sell to Walmart (even though Walmart is all about the abusive relationship) just so these supplies can make a larger profit. Even though they could make the choice to sell to other retail channels, but just make less profit. So, because these supplies want to make more profit, Walmart is evil?[/QUOTE]


Because of the cut to crafts and fabrics, WM had proposed to keep product in store but halving the stores and the product purchases. That dropped sales and WM started agressively going for 65% margins.

I don't even think WM knows what they were doing at the time. We were just expanding to EU WM..... and then the cuts....

I really don't know what happened afterwards, since the loss of sales took out 3rd shift, 2nd shift and eventually my position.

Our sales through WM were solid. There was no reason to cut besides not making more money off of it.
 
[quote name='dohdough']So you can book out whenever you like, but when you post some craziness like you've been doing, don't act suprised when people say you're crazy.[/QUOTE]

You're more than welcome to disagree with me all you want.
All I ask is that you do it without the cursing, the direct insults, the flaming and the attacks on me. There's a world of difference between "I think you're wrong and here's why..." and "You're a @$#%ing idiot." One of those can make for conversation. The other only serves the purpose of destroying any conversation we can have.
 
[quote name='xycury']Because of the cut to crafts and fabrics, WM had proposed to keep product in store but halving the stores and the product purchases. That dropped sales and WM started agressively going for 65% margins.

I don't even think WM knows what they were doing at the time. We were just expanding to EU WM..... and then the cuts....

I really don't know what happened afterwards, since the loss of sales took out 3rd shift, 2nd shift and eventually my position.

Our sales through WM were solid. There was no reason to cut besides not making more money off of it.[/QUOTE]

Just my guess, but it's a dying category. Walmart could devote that space (and piece goods take up a lot of space) to crafts, which sold decently, but were on the decline (at least in our store) *or* they could devote that space to larger electronics sections, larger toys sections, larger food selections... things that people are coming into the stores for. Heck, that space could even be used for the wider aisles that customers have been complaining for forever. Add in to the equation that a piece goods department is pretty labor intensive (the basic design of Walmart is that it is a self-service store) and inventorying the stuff is a pain in the neck (ugh), it was just a smart business decision to cut the merchandise.
 
ducreuxBanishNoodles.png
 
[quote name='UncleBob']You're more than welcome to disagree with me all you want.
All I ask is that you do it without the cursing, the direct insults, the flaming and the attacks on me. There's a world of difference between "I think you're wrong and here's why..." and "You're a @$#%ing idiot." One of those can make for conversation. The other only serves the purpose of destroying any conversation we can have.[/QUOTE]

There's no conversation with you. I don't even know why you come here since every single topic here is exactly the same. You spray your bullshit or pick a fight trying to give "the other side of the story", people try to counteract you with facts/examples/links, you ignore it to continue posting what you originally posted, multiply that by ten to twenty times per thread, people get fed up with you since there is no point in even attempting to be civil with you when you ignore or misconstrue everything they post.

I mean have you even read half the things you posted in this thread? Blah, I don't see you with multi-billion dollar company therefore anything you post is not true. Blah, I could do *insert any crazy thing here* if I wanted to and focused (but I choose not to because my job at this Fortune 500 company rules). Blah, look at this one horribly strange anomaly in the entertainment business (which they still mainly ignore despite him bringing in a ton of cash), clearly the cards are not stacked against anybody.
 
I have never actually seen someone in all seriousness tell people to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps.

The saying started out with the tacit understanding it was the ridiculous proposition it sounds like.
 
That's funny - when I think of people actively thinking of themselves as victims, they would organize and protest instead. Like workers did a century ago to give us so many of the perks of American life that we take for granted or falsely think of as resulting from the "free market."

Unions, man. Not anecdotes of what a handful of people in one city on one day did, in another attempt to fuel racial flames from some ignorant arizona hillbilly.

You know, it's kind of cute in a way - that right wing thought process is centered around (1) claiming the victim mantle and (2) organized political action - you can hear it every day by listening to Beck, Limbaugh, or Hannity. They require that you act as a collective, they require you participate in the protests. The 9/12 thing Beck did was collectivism, for instance. They want you to live the life where you buy into mythologies - bootstrappin' it all on your own, nobody helped you get here but you, anybody can do It™ and those who don't just didn't work hard enough, the free market is fair because it's the free market. You accept all those frameworks uncritically, neglecting to realize you're being lied to by monied interests, just like when you listen to the news or read the paper.

So you can talk about propaganda all you want, but of course nobody *consciously* consumes propaganda (though someone has to explain to me how Sarah Palin's bromides-over-policies approach to talking to the public has been effective in any way) - but you only speak of the propaganda you readily see, which is the propaganda the right wing has prepared you to see. Big deal. Remember the anti-drug film "Reefer Madness?" Do you think that was a propaganda films based on its origin, its message, and its lies? Do you think that's the only propaganda film made on drugs, and that there are no more lies being told by the government or the media? Then I would sit back and deeply reconsider who is the victim (that word again!) or propaganda.

John Bolton was interviewed last night on talk radio about the wikileaks things: he stated what he thought of it, what he thought of the Matthews kid who allegedly leaked everything, etc. He disputed a few ideas put forth in the leaks, saying that it couldn't possibly be true, or that it never happened, so some of the leaks were wrong. But he let out an interesting slip just minutes later in the interview (which the conservative-friendly host of course didn't point out): Bolton said he believed in misinformation, or (as he quoted Churchill), "In time of war, the truth is so precious that she must be protected by a bodyguard of lies." Which means, of course (if you're paying attention, that is), that we can't believe a *thing* that came out of his mouth regarding the accuracy of the wikileaks documents, and he supports the use of propaganda material himself. Additionally, you had the creation of a formal media misinformation group post-9/11 under the Bush Administration, so you've no reason to doubt that you're surrounded by propaganda. It's the cornerstone of your current belief system.

Instead of focusing on what's important, you show your racist side, bringing the "lazy, gubmint-check-dependent unemployed black" stereotype to the equation. Suggesting that victims are docile things. Where did that notion come from? From right wing radio! You've no data to support that, you've no lived experiences. You've had your mind selectively told "black people are lazy and dependent on uncle sam" your whole life, and rebuke the entire notion of a continuing civil rights movement in the process. You dismiss in inequality in power and inequality in wealth that have formed over the years, focusing on a small portion of the population who is no threat to you, no matter how much the right tries to convince you that the lazy negro is sappin' up all our tax dollars.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In myke's deck, all 52 cards are the Race Card.


**EDIT ** Now that I have read myke's last paragraph again, I more firmly believe that he owes thrust an apology. Those are some pretty ugly words and thoughts you presume to attribute to him, myke.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='thrustbucket']Anytime I see a diatribe laced with references to Oppressor and/or Victim, I A) know it's rooted in classic far-left progressive propaganda, and B) makes me go:

Because once you convince entire groups of people to identify themselves as victims:
[/QUOTE]
Conservative posts racist things. Color me surprised.

It's not like black people were ever discriminated against or had structural probelms stemming from racist laws that go back to before the country was even founded. No. Never.Happened.

Hell, they were able to participate in the Homestead Act AND the GI Bill after WW2. It's not like colleges were segregated back then or we had an aparteid state like South Africa either!

america_fuck_yeah_bikini_breasts_cola_gun_big_mac_RE_Wher_do_you_sharenators_come_from-s580x725-71050.jpg


Let's see if I can break CAG too.

edit: Guess not.
 
[quote name='Don Chubo']In myke's deck, all 52 cards are the Race Card.


**EDIT ** Now that I have read myke's last paragraph again, I more firmly believe that he owes thrust an apology. Those are some pretty ugly words and thoughts you presume to attribute to him, myke.[/QUOTE]
HHAHAHAHHAHAHA

Right, because being called a racist is so much worse than being a racist.

LIEberals are the REAL racists...HERPY DERPY :bouncy:
 
[quote name='Don Chubo']In myke's deck, all 52 cards are the Race Card.


**EDIT ** Now that I have read myke's last paragraph again, I more firmly believe that he owes thrust an apology. Those are some pretty ugly words and thoughts you presume to attribute to him, myke.[/QUOTE]

...and just who are you now?
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Oh, wow... Emmitt Perry Jr.
Grew up in an abusive home. Is a minority. Dropped out of High School. Worked low-wage jobs. Somehow, magically, saved up $12,000 at the age of 22, which eventually lead to him launching his own multi-million dollar media franchise.

But no, just a fairy tale. I mean, he's black, after all. A black man could never get that far in society. The white man would never let him.[/QUOTE]
Tyler fucking Perry is your example. Yeah, a black man would have no problem whatsoever in the 1940's finding a white woman, or any woman, with a rich father to finance his sound business plan to start a discount store chain. You're a fucking idiot. How about you name some rich black guys that didn't cut their teeth in entertainment or sports. I bet you can't name more than 5 without consulting google. fuck, name more than 5 black women.

It's like telling a fish it's wet and it's telling you it ain't. It's like talking to a freaking table.(Barney Frank)
 
Oh, come on, douhdough. Stepin Fetchit did pretty well for himself, financially, in that time period.

Picked himself right up by the bootstraps, yessuh.
 
[quote name='dohdough']Tyler fucking Perry is your example. Yeah, a black man would have no problem whatsoever in the 1940's finding a white woman, or any woman, with a rich father to finance his sound business plan to start a discount store chain. You're a fucking idiot. How about you name some rich black guys that didn't cut their teeth in entertainment or sports. I bet you can't name more than 5 without consulting google. fuck, name more than 5 black women.

It's like telling a fish it's wet and it's telling you it ain't. It's like talking to a freaking table.(Barney Frank)[/QUOTE]

What's wrong with Tyler Perry? And what's so shameful about being in the entertainment industry? It is America's largest export.

You do know it's no longer the 1940's, right?
I mean, if you really want to look at earlier in American history though, check out Sarah Breedlove. Black, Female and the first self-made female American Millionaire. Nothing to do with the entertainment industry.

Then, there's John Johnson. Yes, he got a $500 up-start loan from his mother in 1942 (hey, someone gave a black guy a loan in the 40's! whudda know?). He managed to make a few million before he died in 2005 at age 87. I bet he could have lived longer if he hadn't eaten all that ramen.

More recently, there's the tale of the little black girl, sexually abused by multiple members of her family. Ran away from home multiple times. Had her first kid at 14. Banished to live with her grandmother. Her first job was friggin' bagging groceries for pocket change. Yet, from these humble beginnings, young Gail went on to become what some call the most influential woman in the world. ...and a Billionaire. She's still black, by the way. Sadly, she doesn't count because she's part of the evil entertainment industry.

Then there's that one guy. Born to a bi-racial couple. Father left the family when he was young. Mother banished him to live with his grandparents at age 10. Drug abuser in his teens (alcohol, marijuana, cocaine). Worked his way through Harvard Law School. Ended up doing pretty good for himself, if I recall.

But, regardless, it doesn't matter. Are these people the norm? No. But, are they random freaks of nature? Nada. They're men and women who had a crazy-good work ethic, saw a need and used their talents and knowledge to fill that need instead of playing the victim, singing "woe is me" and waiting for someone else to come along and do everything for them. Maybe they are random freaks of nature after all.

[quote name='Sporadic']There's no conversation with you.[/QUOTE]

Then quit hitting that reply button. It's not that hard.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']...and just who are you now?[/QUOTE]

Just someone calling you out. You're so quick to call someone a racist - we all get that you think that pretty much everyone (except you and your buddies here of course) is racist, WE GET IT. Just don't mention your past ethnic slurs - that may take a bit of the heat out of your baseless accusations.

As far as thrust being a racist, I honestly don't see it.

Stay Classy, myke. Stay Classy.
 
[quote name='Don Chubo']As far as thrust being a racist, I honestly don't see it.[/QUOTE]

Discussions about "groups" of people, followed by three videos of strictly black people clamoring for government support - that doesn't tap into the racist and sexist stereotype of the "welfare queen" that's so commonly used among those on the right?

Not seeing it doesn't mean it isn't there - it's clear as day to those who are cognizant enough. Erik Erikson theorized that children began to understand that when they stop seeing something, it continues to exist (e.g., a mother walking out of the room is still extant, just somewhere else) around 18 months of age. My, my, you are quite the late bloomer.

I can't hear a dog whistle, so it must not make a sound, yes?
 
It must take an awesome brain to look at all the racist material posted by Republicans in the last few months alone and still declare that racism is dead.

Dur hur, where's our white history month guyz? Huh? Huh?
 
[quote name='dohdough']Conservative posts racist things. Color me surprised.

It's not like black people were ever discriminated against or had structural probelms stemming from racist laws that go back to before the country was even founded. No. Never.Happened.

Hell, they were able to participate in the Homestead Act AND the GI Bill after WW2. It's not like colleges were segregated back then or we had an aparteid state like South Africa either!

[/QUOTE]

[quote name='mykevermin']That's funny - when I think of people actively thinking of themselves as victims, they would organize and protest instead. Like workers did a century ago to give us so many of the perks of American life that we take for granted or falsely think of as resulting from the "free market."

Unions, man. Not anecdotes of what a handful of people in one city on one day did, in another attempt to fuel racial flames from some ignorant arizona hillbilly.

You know, it's kind of cute in a way - that right wing thought process is centered around (1) claiming the victim mantle and (2) organized political action - you can hear it every day by listening to Beck, Limbaugh, or Hannity. They require that you act as a collective, they require you participate in the protests. The 9/12 thing Beck did was collectivism, for instance. They want you to live the life where you buy into mythologies - bootstrappin' it all on your own, nobody helped you get here but you, anybody can do It™ and those who don't just didn't work hard enough, the free market is fair because it's the free market. You accept all those frameworks uncritically, neglecting to realize you're being lied to by monied interests, just like when you listen to the news or read the paper.

So you can talk about propaganda all you want, but of course nobody *consciously* consumes propaganda (though someone has to explain to me how Sarah Palin's bromides-over-policies approach to talking to the public has been effective in any way) - but you only speak of the propaganda you readily see, which is the propaganda the right wing has prepared you to see. Big deal. Remember the anti-drug film "Reefer Madness?" Do you think that was a propaganda films based on its origin, its message, and its lies? Do you think that's the only propaganda film made on drugs, and that there are no more lies being told by the government or the media? Then I would sit back and deeply reconsider who is the victim (that word again!) or propaganda.

John Bolton was interviewed last night on talk radio about the wikileaks things: he stated what he thought of it, what he thought of the Matthews kid who allegedly leaked everything, etc. He disputed a few ideas put forth in the leaks, saying that it couldn't possibly be true, or that it never happened, so some of the leaks were wrong. But he let out an interesting slip just minutes later in the interview (which the conservative-friendly host of course didn't point out): Bolton said he believed in misinformation, or (as he quoted Churchill), "In time of war, the truth is so precious that she must be protected by a bodyguard of lies." Which means, of course (if you're paying attention, that is), that we can't believe a *thing* that came out of his mouth regarding the accuracy of the wikileaks documents, and he supports the use of propaganda material himself. Additionally, you had the creation of a formal media misinformation group post-9/11 under the Bush Administration, so you've no reason to doubt that you're surrounded by propaganda. It's the cornerstone of your current belief system.

Instead of focusing on what's important, you show your racist side, bringing the "lazy, gubmint-check-dependent unemployed black" stereotype to the equation. Suggesting that victims are docile things. Where did that notion come from? From right wing radio! You've no data to support that, you've no lived experiences. You've had your mind selectively told "black people are lazy and dependent on uncle sam" your whole life, and rebuke the entire notion of a continuing civil rights movement in the process. You dismiss in inequality in power and inequality in wealth that have formed over the years, focusing on a small portion of the population who is no threat to you, no matter how much the right tries to convince you that the lazy negro is sappin' up all our tax dollars.[/QUOTE]

Holy fuck.

My post was not in any way meant to have anything to do with race. I found those videos by doing searches for words that had nothing to do with race.

Myke, you start out making some good points, for a change, in your post - that I was eager to reply to - and then, in your final paragraph, you revert back to your horribly predictable tactics; flying your ignorant racial flag with flying colors. How utterly disappointing. You should seriously be ashamed of yourself - you have an amazing ability to throw up shakey racial shield, or call a racist, to any argument or person or point you don't like -- Which happens to be the most popular progressive tactic in the playbook behind the Oppressor/Victim bedtime stories.

You race-baters are truly despicable and are the divisive rotten core of this country.

Truly amazing how you far lefties can convert absolutely any discussion or point into a racial issue. Good lord, if I made a thread about the moon, myke and his ilk would be talking about hidden racist history of Nasa before page 2.
 
[quote name='thrustbucket']my post was not in any way meant to have anything to do with race. [/quote]

...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................

Wait wait wait wait wait.

..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Discussions about "groups" of people, followed by three videos of strictly black people clamoring for government support - that doesn't tap into the racist and sexist stereotype of the "welfare queen" that's so commonly used among those on the right?

Not seeing it doesn't mean it isn't there - it's clear as day to those who are cognizant enough. Erik Erikson theorized that children began to understand that when they stop seeing something, it continues to exist (e.g., a mother walking out of the room is still extant, just somewhere else) around 18 months of age. My, my, you are quite the late bloomer.

I can't hear a dog whistle, so it must not make a sound, yes?[/QUOTE]

Got it. Not enough non-black folk in those videos to suit you. If you want a rainbow representation of people clamoring for government support, go look at some of the speeches the Big O gave on college campuses where he promised that Uncle Sam would help pay for college. There are people of all sorts or different colors cheering that.

As far as thrust using the Peggy Joesph video - it's not that she's black, myke. It's that she's obviously looking forward to the free ride. Her attitude would be offensive no matter what color her skin is. Since you only can think in terms of skin color, I can see how that thought may not come to mind.

Not that any of that would matter in the least. You've made up your mind, we're all racist (except you), so that's that. No need to discuss it any longer! Though we both know that won't happen since you have a possibly pathological need for the last word.

And nice touch shooting for the insult at the end. Stay Classy, myke.
 
bread's done
Back
Top