[quote name='pitfallharry219']It's hard to believe that it's been almost two years since Benoit has been gone. It seems he's been more forgotten than forgiven*.
*By forgiven, I'm talking about separating what he did with his family from his body of work in wrestling. It seems it's hard for people not to look at it as a total package.
*I feel like jollydwarf using these asterisks.[/QUOTE]
Really, I think that sums up the benefit (or detriment, depending on who you are) of WWE controlling, uh, almost everything. Out of sight, out of mind... I mean, Benoit notwithstanding, we're actually in an era of wrestling where WWE is purposely not remembering their own history, unless it benefits them (like Taker's streak). With the 'blanding' of everything, they seem to not want any attention drawn to the 'before', especially anything like the Attitude Era (again, unless it benefits ratings... like trotting out Austin). The only difference between Benoit and people like Eddie and Perfect is that Eddie and Perfect got DVDs (cause WWE likes money).
That, in a nutshell, is the Benoit problem. If you edit your own history enough, *did* they exist? Sure, we get matches, but there will never be any discussion of storylines.
Case in point, let's think about this upcoming WCW DVD. Do we truly think Benoit will be anywhere on it? When I think of the fall part of 'Rise and Fall of WCW', two of the biggest things I think of are Benoit beating Sid and giving the title back, and then the four of them jumping ship. It makes WWE look great, but it won't be on there, will it? What about Horsemen stuff? It's like on the Mr. Perfect DVD, where they're edited around the Savage stuff, thereby cutting out a big chunk of time.
Then again, I'm also someone that can still watch Benoit stuff and keep it separate from what happened two years ago, so I'm likely the minority.