And forced Kinect, and daily check-ins. DRM is just one broken cog in that messed up system.$100 isn't too big of a difference to me, but is a lot to others it seems
to me when you throw in that $100 AND the DRM It's big trouble for MS.
And forced Kinect, and daily check-ins. DRM is just one broken cog in that messed up system.$100 isn't too big of a difference to me, but is a lot to others it seems
to me when you throw in that $100 AND the DRM It's big trouble for MS.
LOL, are you serious?I guess it depends on how much you value instant switching of games without inserting a disk. the ability to play another game while waiting for match making is impossible without the diskless drm.
do you still want to insert game disc for every game you own forever?
agreed.Very valid point but I think you have to look at both presentation as a one the May and today's along with Sony's February conference and today's to truly see the full package and value.Can't believe I;m saying this, but: maybe Microsoft should of featured kinect more in their presentation. $100 difference mainly comes there, and no real attraction to justify it.
I have preordered both and currently own both. I am more intrigued by X1 and will more than likely stay on that path.
The real decision will not come today but in the coming weeks when we learn more.
You can definitely tell that there truly wasn't a need for a new generation of gaming in 2013 when things are so similar between the two.
They're making Gamerscore meaningless next gen anyway, though. A day-one achievement for preordering the console? Achievements for buying a lot of games from the same publisher? Achievements for watching TV? Achievements for purchasing content? Achievements were great... why fix what isn't broken? They took a fragile ecosystem and disrupted it.As stupid as it is, though, I'm going to hate losing my Gamerscore...
That would explain Microsoft getting the Battlefield content early. PS3 got Battlefield 3 content early, so would it surprise you if EA was one of the main companies pushing MS to do the DRM thing?agreed.Very valid point but I think you have to look at both presentation as a one the May and today's along with Sony's February conference and today's to truly see the full package and value.Can't believe I;m saying this, but: maybe Microsoft should of featured kinect more in their presentation. $100 difference mainly comes there, and no real attraction to justify it.
I have preordered both and currently own both. I am more intrigued by X1 and will more than likely stay on that path.
The real decision will not come today but in the coming weeks when we learn more.
You can definitely tell that there truly wasn't a need for a new generation of gaming in 2013 when things are so similar between the two.
MS is basically banking on 3 things: people really love TV integration; their online experience (digital games, "family-sharing", persistent servers) rocks, and kinect with some worthwhile games.
They definitely lost momentum among hardcore gamers, but maybe in a few years (maybe even earlier?) they aren't dead yet.
One thing I'm confused about, is if Sony isn't on board with the no-used-game thing, how are the publishers doing a deal with Microsoft? More exclusives?
I had heard there was a patent for the TV watching, but I wasn't aware it had been implemented. This is also the first I've heard of achievements for making purchases (though I knew about the bonus "pre-order" achievement). If this is all true, it really does kill the nice metagame they had going.They're making Gamerscore meaningless next gen anyway, though. A day-one achievement for preordering the console? Achievements for buying a lot of games from the same publisher? Achievements for watching TV? Achievements for purchasing content? Achievements were great... why fix what isn't broken? They took a fragile ecosystem and disrupted it.As stupid as it is, though, I'm going to hate losing my Gamerscore...
pretty sure Sony said that it wouldn't be backwards compatible at the Sony event in Febuary.Damn Sony killed it tonight. No online requirement, no trade or used game restrictions (as it freaking SHOULD be), $100 cheaper, and support for indie developers. Also possible streaming PS3 games through Gakai. Still no word on backwards compatibility but I'm guessing no (saddly), which is likely to push gakai service. Also suckes that PS+ now required for multiplayer but servers cost money on a recurrent basis and since PS+ gives so many benefits I can accept that.
I can't understand how any consumer can support MS in this - they have forsaken their user base and are essentially killing the video game console as we know it. Sure, some of the flashy social stuff is cool for a minute, but at what cost?!
Not that achievements carried much weight before, but they're definitely jumping the shark with the Xbone.They're making Gamerscore meaningless next gen anyway, though. A day-one achievement for preordering the console? Achievements for buying a lot of games from the same publisher? Achievements for watching TV? Achievements for purchasing content? Achievements were great... why fix what isn't broken? They took a fragile ecosystem and disrupted it.As stupid as it is, though, I'm going to hate losing my Gamerscore...
I wonder how EA felt with Microsoft messing up their sound in their reveal.That would explain Microsoft getting the Battlefield content early. PS3 got Battlefield 3 content early, so would it surprise you if EA was one of the main companies pushing MS to do the DRM thing?
But they really can't, at least right now. A lot of the goodwill they've built up with EA/Ubisoft/whoever is due to their restrictive DRM. They can't suddenly go back and say "sorry, we're dumping that since people don't like it."So Microsoft HAS to eliminate their DRM and used game plans now right? I mean how can they have the more expensive system AND be more restrictive?
Why does everyone assume it's the other publishers that are pushing Microsoft to do DRM? Microsoft is a strong supporter of DRM and has it in all of their other products (Windows, Microsoft Office, Games for Windows Live), why would other companies need to push them to put it in their console?That would explain Microsoft getting the Battlefield content early. PS3 got Battlefield 3 content early, so would it surprise you if EA was one of the main companies pushing MS to do the DRM thing?agreed.Very valid point but I think you have to look at both presentation as a one the May and today's along with Sony's February conference and today's to truly see the full package and value.Can't believe I;m saying this, but: maybe Microsoft should of featured kinect more in their presentation. $100 difference mainly comes there, and no real attraction to justify it.
I have preordered both and currently own both. I am more intrigued by X1 and will more than likely stay on that path.
The real decision will not come today but in the coming weeks when we learn more.
You can definitely tell that there truly wasn't a need for a new generation of gaming in 2013 when things are so similar between the two.
MS is basically banking on 3 things: people really love TV integration; their online experience (digital games, "family-sharing", persistent servers) rocks, and kinect with some worthwhile games.
They definitely lost momentum among hardcore gamers, but maybe in a few years (maybe even earlier?) they aren't dead yet.
One thing I'm confused about, is if Sony isn't on board with the no-used-game thing, how are the publishers doing a deal with Microsoft? More exclusives?
I love achievements and it would have been a big reason for me to stick with Microsoft over Sony for next gen, but you're right, it seems like they're basically changing the system into something unrecognizable anyway.They're making Gamerscore meaningless next gen anyway, though. A day-one achievement for preordering the console? Achievements for buying a lot of games from the same publisher? Achievements for watching TV? Achievements for purchasing content? Achievements were great... why fix what isn't broken? They took a fragile ecosystem and disrupted it.As stupid as it is, though, I'm going to hate losing my Gamerscore...
As far as I am aware Microsoft has said that it was the publishers that wanted the used game restrictions and DRM. I could be wrong but I thought I remember them saying thatWhy does everyone assume it's the other publishers that are pushing Microsoft to do DRM? Microsoft is a strong supporter of DRM and has it in all of their other products (Windows, Microsoft Office, Games for Windows Live), why would other companies need to push them to put it in their console?That would explain Microsoft getting the Battlefield content early. PS3 got Battlefield 3 content early, so would it surprise you if EA was one of the main companies pushing MS to do the DRM thing?agreed.Very valid point but I think you have to look at both presentation as a one the May and today's along with Sony's February conference and today's to truly see the full package and value.Can't believe I;m saying this, but: maybe Microsoft should of featured kinect more in their presentation. $100 difference mainly comes there, and no real attraction to justify it.
I have preordered both and currently own both. I am more intrigued by X1 and will more than likely stay on that path.
The real decision will not come today but in the coming weeks when we learn more.
You can definitely tell that there truly wasn't a need for a new generation of gaming in 2013 when things are so similar between the two.
MS is basically banking on 3 things: people really love TV integration; their online experience (digital games, "family-sharing", persistent servers) rocks, and kinect with some worthwhile games.
They definitely lost momentum among hardcore gamers, but maybe in a few years (maybe even earlier?) they aren't dead yet.
One thing I'm confused about, is if Sony isn't on board with the no-used-game thing, how are the publishers doing a deal with Microsoft? More exclusives?
it's been knowing for years game publishers wanted part of the used game salesWhy does everyone assume it's the other publishers that are pushing Microsoft to do DRM? Microsoft is a strong supporter of DRM and has it in all of their other products (Windows, Microsoft Office, Games for Windows Live), why would other companies need to push them to put it in their console?That would explain Microsoft getting the Battlefield content early. PS3 got Battlefield 3 content early, so would it surprise you if EA was one of the main companies pushing MS to do the DRM thing?agreed.Very valid point but I think you have to look at both presentation as a one the May and today's along with Sony's February conference and today's to truly see the full package and value.Can't believe I;m saying this, but: maybe Microsoft should of featured kinect more in their presentation. $100 difference mainly comes there, and no real attraction to justify it.
I have preordered both and currently own both. I am more intrigued by X1 and will more than likely stay on that path.
The real decision will not come today but in the coming weeks when we learn more.
You can definitely tell that there truly wasn't a need for a new generation of gaming in 2013 when things are so similar between the two.
MS is basically banking on 3 things: people really love TV integration; their online experience (digital games, "family-sharing", persistent servers) rocks, and kinect with some worthwhile games.
They definitely lost momentum among hardcore gamers, but maybe in a few years (maybe even earlier?) they aren't dead yet.
One thing I'm confused about, is if Sony isn't on board with the no-used-game thing, how are the publishers doing a deal with Microsoft? More exclusives?
for me DRM doesn't matter my Xbox is online 24/7 either way the $100 more does hurt especially considering the PS4 has better/faster RAM but in the end the games are what make it easy for me. I like western style games so its a choice between games like Ryse, Quantum Break, Dead Rising 3 or Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts, Knack.i think im more angry at ms then anything tonight. MAN i love like 3 x1 only games and non for ps4 only but i just can't do it with 500 price point and the 24 hour thing. At least i got both pre orderd on amazon so i can rest easy and have until nov to decided. i just feel ms drop the ball with the price point mostly. i might just hold out and not buy any at launch seeing most of the games i want to play don't even come out at launch most are 2014 games.
hey how you enjoy ms press conf. i would have love to been at conf but happy to play some of these ms and sony games tommow can not wait jsut in my hotel been here all day watching this stuffdamn. So Sony wins hand down
that's the thing i was wondering i don't really want any of the 1st party launch titles for ps4 i really don't now with x1 i really want 3 of those exlusive games but the 24 hour thing and 500 bucks is pushing it for me to get x1 at launchOne thing I wonder... Has Sony's focus on the backend of this generation hurt their launch/year one lineup for next gen?
Not sure if they can at this point, maybe they can make it less restrictive? I was talking to one of my friends the other day who is a huge xbox guy and he kept going on and on about how there's no way in hell xbox is doing the whole DRM thing and not Sony, and I agreed. I just hoped Sony would be the lesser of two evils. I was very shocked with what they anncouce tonight and can't understand why MS would go that route when Sony is not.So Microsoft HAS to eliminate their DRM and used game plans now right? I mean how can they have the more expensive system AND be more restrictive? SOME people will buy it but for a lot of people (like me) who were on the fence this is a no brainer right now.
maybe sony seen the backlash and made a 360Not sure if they can at this point, maybe they can make it less restrictive? I was talking to one of my friends the other day who is a huge xbox guy and he kept going on and on about how there's no way in hell xbox is doing the whole DRM thing and not Sony, and I agreed. I just hoped Sony would be the lesser of two evils. I was very shocked with what they anncouce tonight and can't understand why MS would go that route when Sony is not.So Microsoft HAS to eliminate their DRM and used game plans now right? I mean how can they have the more expensive system AND be more restrictive? SOME people will buy it but for a lot of people (like me) who were on the fence this is a no brainer right now.
you cna turn kinect off and even unhook it when system is not in use. But most people have cams connected to their computer these days whats not to say thsoe things are not used to spy on you .One thing I haven't seen discussed much is the required kinect connection just to use the XBONE. I mean the fact that kinect is required for your console to work is BS by itself, but what about the privacy implications? With all we've learned this week alone about the NSA having carte blanche ability to spy on every online account we have without a specific (personalized) warrant, you would honestly have to be nuts to give microsoft (a company handing over user data to the NSA/government) a camera in your home! Not to mention the lack of protections you have against MS using whatever they record (unkown to you) for whatever purposes they see fit!
Thanks, because Timbo was sure it was going to be the same as the XBone. That should clear it up for him.Hey guys here some clarification on how to share games on PS4. I know the Whole Xbox thing was a bit confusing. This is how PS4 is handling the issue. I hope you can grasp the concept....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWSIFh8ICaA
Tack me down as wealthy.Microsoft failed miserably. This competition is over, why would anyone buy an Xbox One? Ridiculous DRM associated with the Xbox One and it's being sold $100 more for the privilege of being screwed over by Publishers? You'd have to be an idiot to buy an Xbox One, or just very wealthy.
They've said you can turn every Kinect feature off which ultimately means Kinect isn't required. They want the persistent connection for people that don't take the time to turn said features off so they can spy for ad revenue. It's quite simply horseshit.One thing I haven't seen discussed much is the required kinect connection just to use the XBONE. I mean the fact that kinect is required for your console to work is BS by itself, but what about the privacy implications? With all we've learned this week alone about the NSA having carte blanche ability to spy on every online account we have without a specific (personalized) warrant, you would honestly have to be nuts to give microsoft (a company handing over user data to the NSA/government) a camera in your home! Not to mention the lack of protections you have against MS using whatever they record (unkown to you) for whatever purposes they see fit!
It's also said that even with turning the Kinect features off it will need to be turned on once every 24hours.They've said you can turn every Kinect feature off which ultimately means Kinect isn't required. They want the persistent connection for people that don't take the time to turn said features off so they can spy for ad revenue. It's quite simply horseshit.One thing I haven't seen discussed much is the required kinect connection just to use the XBONE. I mean the fact that kinect is required for your console to work is BS by itself, but what about the privacy implications? With all we've learned this week alone about the NSA having carte blanche ability to spy on every online account we have without a specific (personalized) warrant, you would honestly have to be nuts to give microsoft (a company handing over user data to the NSA/government) a camera in your home! Not to mention the lack of protections you have against MS using whatever they record (unkown to you) for whatever purposes they see fit!
I don't know what conferences you watched, MS hit it out of the ball park with their conference the thing is Sony hit it perfectly on price and DRM, gaming wise it was very lacklusterIt was a awesome day. Sony kicked ass and MS sucked. Games were interting enough but I felt there were too many FPS games.
Highlight for me was seeing Angy Joe and HHG
They did say that, but the kinect must be plugged in for the XBONE to work. Also, I'm not sure how turning it on relates to the online check requirements (required?). And what about games that require the kinect for minor features - will those be playable with it disabled - or will you purchase a new game, install it, then find out it requires kinect for some voice control features that you are uninterested in - but now you have little recourse for return/resell because of restrictive DRM. What exactly will MS do with video/audio recorded when kinect isn't "disabled". Could the government ask for and receive recorded or live data from all kinect users without their knowdledge - probably... I don't know the answers to those questions, but I know that I value what little privacy we have left in this society, and personally would not accept the risks of such a system in my house. Undoubtedly such issues will become commonplace one day, and we all may be faced with "smart" and everpresent appliances, consoles, tv's, etc- but hopefully by that point we can have some legal standing for privacy protections from both companies and our own government.They've said you can turn every Kinect feature off which ultimately means Kinect isn't required. They want the persistent connection for people that don't take the time to turn said features off so they can spy for ad revenue. It's quite simply horseshit.One thing I haven't seen discussed much is the required kinect connection just to use the XBONE. I mean the fact that kinect is required for your console to work is BS by itself, but what about the privacy implications? With all we've learned this week alone about the NSA having carte blanche ability to spy on every online account we have without a specific (personalized) warrant, you would honestly have to be nuts to give microsoft (a company handing over user data to the NSA/government) a camera in your home! Not to mention the lack of protections you have against MS using whatever they record (unkown to you) for whatever purposes they see fit!
I imagine only people who do not know about the massive DRM and like Halo and want the next Halo would buy the X1, Also casuals and parents who have no idea about the DRM and want the next new game box will buy it. (but not next to a 399 PS4 imo )So Microsoft HAS to eliminate their DRM and used game plans now right? I mean how can they have the more expensive system AND be more restrictive? SOME people will buy it but for a lot of people (like me) who were on the fence this is a no brainer right now.
Some funnys I found:The online DRM absolutely kills it for me--and it really bums me out, having been a huge MS supporter over the past two generations.
If MS allows bypassing the 24-hour check-in by having physical media in the drive (or simply does away with online checks entirely) I'd be on board again, even at the higher price. I actually preferred their show and the games they presented. I'd love to see them backpedal, but I'm really not confident they will. If not, I'll purchase a PS4 on day one, with the X1 coming way later--if at all.
As stupid as it is, though, I'm going to hate losing my Gamerscore...
That was Microsoft trying to deflect some of the hate off of them. Publishers have said Microsoft presented the DRM scheme to them, not vise-versa.As far as I am aware Microsoft has said that it was the publishers that wanted the used game restrictions and DRM. I could be wrong but I thought I remember them saying that
For the most part the best games Microsoft showed were multiplats.Metal Gear Solid 5, Witcher 3, Battlefield 4, and Titanfall. Everything else was a cut scene except Dead Rising which I did like. Don't know why people are excited over Killer Instinct, that game looked so meh.I don't know what conferences you watched, MS hit it out of the ball park with their conference the thing is Sony hit it perfectly on price and DRM, gaming wise it was very lacklusterIt was a awesome day. Sony kicked ass and MS sucked. Games were interting enough but I felt there were too many FPS games.
Highlight for me was seeing Angy Joe and HHG
Yeah I found the podcast pretty hard to listen to with how much he was being an MS apologist. Guess he can eat some crow now especially when he was saying no way Sony isn't doing the same.Looking forward to the Cheapy xbone spin on the podcast.![]()