[quote name='bojay1997']It has nothing to do with gamers being stupid and lazy, it has everything to do with publishers wanting to maximize profit. This is an incredibly niche title and doing even a limited run would likely not be cost effective for the publisher in the US. Simply publishing the game digitally is much cheaper and less risky for the publisher and still allows those who want the game to buy it over here. As a collector I agree that digital versions are not great, but if the choice is between being able to play the game and not, I would at least rather have the option to buy a localized version, even if it is digital only.[/QUOTE]
Agreed. However, given the HUGE benefits of digital distribution to publishers, there should be corresponding concessions to the consumers. i.e. The cost of digitally-distributed titles should cost far, far less than their physical counterparts and that just isn't happening for the most part.
The digital distribution system is almost wholly beneficial to the publisher, at the expense of everyone else in the industry. The publisher removes virtually all of it's direct per-unit costs, including manufacturing, distribution, and retail markup differential. This results not only in higher profits for publishers, but major losses for the manufacturing, retail, and re-sale sectors.
And, of course, the consumer loses any long-term product certainty along with virtually all product ownership rights. Anyone who thinks that's good for the industry as a whole, long-term, should take a look at the dwindling state of the PC gaming industry which has been headed in this direction for quite some time now (with Steam and single-use CD-keys).
Digital distribution is something most publishers want to see happen across the board because it is a HUGE short- and mid-term win for them, but it's a HUGE loss for consumers (and retailers) in the long run.