Hmm.
Just when I think TNA might be onto something after reading their spoilers for the next few weeks (specifically where they seem to be heading in terms of who will be feuding w/ Immortal), they go and suggest something dunderheaded like this.
There's no reason to ditch the title. It's not like there's a "division" anyway. TNA never bothered to define what it was (often going for the corny "it's not about weight limits, it's about no limits" tag line instead).
It could be a useful title in the same sense that the IC title is: a vehicle to demonstrate the upward movement of a wrestler. Daniel Bryan winning the US title from the Miz was a pretty well developed storyline with a solid payoff, and holding that belt gives Bryan some legitimacy that he might have had a much harder time developing w/ fans who don't know him from Husky or any other NXT goofball.
They perhaps think the television/legends/global title (it has had all those names, yes?) is what does that. But they just put the
in' thing on Abyss, and it's not like it was ever held by someone in the promotion who needed to prove their mettle to the crowd.
The name of the title is fine. What in the world is "Intercontinental" anyway? Sounds like dude who has it is champion of the major global bodies of water. King of the Aquamen or somesuch. It's a silly name, but people don't seem to mind.
Actually, speaking of Intercontinental, I was watching the 1989 Royal Rumble for a minute tonight (I still mark out for Ax and Smash drawing #1 and #2), and I noticed two things:
1) Gorilla Monsoon refers to the 6-man tag (Hart Foundation/Duggan vs Rougeaus/Dino Bravo) as going by "Intercontinental Rules," meaning it was a 2 out of 3 falls match. I can understand why they wouldn't want to overuse that match type (but they should use it far more than they have lately, as evidenced by Rey/Del Rio). Just found it interesting to see that the in-ring content is so unimportant now that it would be insanity to make the opening match in a current wrestling PPV 24 minutes long.
2) This made me
in' spittake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzQkkhm3uak
Watch it all, but pay attention right around 1:00 in. They clearly recorded McMahon in one take for the audio overlay, which is fine. He stammers a bit, and that's fine. Announcers do that all the time, and we ignore it and move on.
But at 1:00, the pause while he tries to figure out just who the
that guy is made me laugh so damned hard, I watched it about five times. Just wonderful, and I'm glad they didn't edit it from the DVD release.
If you're a collector of the WWE's Big 4 PPVs, I just picked up Royal Rumble 2009/2010 in a 2-pack at WM yesterday for $10. Now I'm only missing 2008.