[quote name='mykevermin']Yeah, it's an "honorable mention" thing. Semantics meant to fool the fools, placate the stars, and market to dimwits.
Like when so-and-so WWE Sooperstar™ comes out to the ring for a match *after* the champ does. That is deliberately done to showcase the true star - not to bury the champ, mind you, but to emphasize (bold, underline, italicize) the "star attraction" of the show.
Which is another point entirely - the *TITLE* should be the showcase, but it hasn't been since Mick Foley's body was reasonably unbroken.
You know who the "star" of Game of Thrones is? The Iron
ing Throne. Everyone is vying for power, for authority, for respect, and for legitimacy in the form of the Throne. It's the "title" of the show, and everyone is more or less focused on it in some way, shape, or form. If you've read the books, it's much more evident (if you've only watched the program, it feels more like Starks = protagonists, Lannisters = antagonists).
If WWE produced the tv show, there would be a new king 7 times a season, and so-and-so (who is the most unbearable character in the series - Daenarys?) would be the king (or queen, I suppose) every other week.[/QUOTE]
Too true, seems like these days the grudge matches are the main events. Somebody might be defending the title, but these two guys have had an ongoing feud all year long, and their match is the main event.
For the record, Dinklage is the star of Game of Thrones.