[quote name='ananag112']At this point, I don't care what its called. I just want some new Star Trek stuff to keep in going and to perhaps start a new TV series.
Which brings me to my next question, what would you want the next Star Trek series to be about? On the GameFaqs Star Trek board, it was suggested that perhaps there could be a series which takes place on Timeship Relativity where members must travel back and forth trough time and perhaps visit other times of other Star Trek series. Or perhaps something about the Temporal Cold War. I thought this was an interesting idea and wanted to know what you guys thought.[/quote]
Oh, JourneyTrek.
(No offense to Journeyman, one of my favorite new series which sadly died young).
I don't think it would work. Time travel is too confusing -- even among the writers and episodes of Trek, it's not consistent how it works. I personally love time travel stories, but virtually every time I try to talk about them with someone who is not an ubergeek, they get confused. Hell, I had to explain 12 Monkeys to a bunch of people because they just did not get it, and they were all engineers. You'd lose the casual audience. As much as I loved Journeyman and as much as I think they got the time travel thing exactly right, I think too many people couldn't follow it easily enough.
Not that I think that Star Trek should be catered to the casual audience. I think that's been the problem with Trek for far too long. The whole ideas of bottle shows and reset buttons and keeping characters in a virtual stasis are for the viewer who doesn't religiously tune in every week and can't tell you the difference between a Borg and a Breen. But it's that, more than anything else, that has brought Star Trek to where it is now.
I also don't think the future is in reusing crew members from earlier series. How do you tell new stories with old characters? How do you decide what baggage from the past to bring along, and what to leave behind? Except for Enterprise, all the recent Trek series had seven years to develop their characters. What more about them needs to be said?
Star Trek needs to decide what kind of show it wants to be before anything else, including what the setting or story should be. I think it should strive for something that takes the best parts of TNG and DS9, but even that's not going to be easy.
DS9 was forced to become what it was because the station never went anywhere. That meant they had to develop the characters and the political situations more than in any other series, and they couldn't easily fall back on forehead aliens of the week, or strange new planets. It's something to note that, for the most part, when DS9 did that, it sucked.
TNG, though, is the gold standard. I think it's what people think of most fondly when they think of modern Trek. Some of this is nostagia, but it's hard to deny that TNG had the essential magic of Star Trek.
Fusing the concepts of these two series in the wrong way is disasterous -- witness Voyager, or the worst of both worlds. Aimless and clueless, hurtling from one spatial anomaly to the next without bothering to do anything with its characters. Voyager delivered more of the same bland science fiction lite, each week, never daring much but never achieving much, either, and that is the problem.
We don't need more TNG. While the presence of Star Trek on the airwaves is comforting, we really don't need another series that looks and feels the same, that tells the same tired stories in the same tired ways. We've seen them, and we can see them anytime on DVD.
Enterprise failed because it didn't know what it wanted to be until it was too late. After two seasons of business as usual, with forehead aliens and marooned shuttlecrafts and weird spatial anomalies, people checked out.
People will check back in for new Trek because it's been awhile, but if it seems like warmed over old Trek, they'll check right back out.
Star Trek also faces another dilemma: people want Trek for the familiarity of Klingons and Vulcans and Borg. But, as much as it pains me to say this, they are played out. Going back to the trough so many times has left us with whiny, emotional Vulcans (Enterprise), eviscerated, emasculated Borg (TNG/VOY) and endless jokes about gakh.
Trek is going to have to find a brave new world, with new races of aliens that will be as cool as the Borg used to be, way back when. That has the courage to give people something worth seeing, instead of what they say they want to see. Because if the new Trek is carefully triangulated from elements of the old that people clamor for, what we'll end up getting is like a political candidate: slick, initially appealing, and exciting for a moment, but empty on the inside and boring once it starts talking.