Recent content by ZarathosNY

PAD, you are the one who is ignoring facts. Phase II of the Senate investigation hasn't happened yet. That is why Reid pullled his stunt. Senate repubs are dragging their feet in order to protect Bush.

DOH! My mistake. I didn't see the second link.

Actually, it's not the same article. Mine comes from the Washington Post, his from the Washington times. It's also better to compare 2003 and 2005, since they were non-election years.

The WP has the info here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/11/AR2005111101833.html Now, the latest financial numbers are prompting new doubts. From January through September, the Republican National Committee raised $81.5 million, with $34 million remaining in the...

It seems there are people who were at the event who didn't see any oreos thrown. http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/politics/bal-md.oreos13nov13,0,6788452.story Ehrlich bristles at Oreo skeptics Account of Steele pelted by cookies in '02 under scrutiny By Andrew A. Green Sun reporter...

Actually, waving a flag upside down is the international signal for distress. They mentioned this on one of the seasons of Survivor, since in one of the challenges one of the teams did this. Ah, the things you learn on reality TV. :)

Winning the X-box games just might give me an incentive to pick up a X-box :) So Cheapy, how long will it take you to learn Japanese?

They're going to bring charges against Ken Starr?

I think to determine if blacks are more prone to criminal activity to whites, you would have to take into consideration those who get probation and community service. Blacks, I think, tend more to get prison sentences for lesser crimes while white people would get probation and community service.

Sorry but you have been shown to be wrong time and time again on FACTS, not flavors of ice cream. When shown to be wrong on thread, you either stop replying to it, or you start calling names. YOU should be used to being proven wrong time and time again.

How does it feel to be consistantly shown to be wrong on this board PAD? No, I am not saying I am qualified in legal matters, but I firmly believe that a Supreme Court Justice nominee needs to have more than two years experience as a judge.

Those 78 should be ashamed of themselves for voting in someone who only has TWO years experience as a judge.

That's right. The msm does a lot of poor reporting. Just look how they covered the run-up to the Iraqi war, the recent presidential elections, and Whitewater. Each media outlet wants to be the first to get something sensational on the air, so fact checking gets lost in the shuffle.

As was said before, she had a 13 year record as a judge that could be examined, plus her name was suggested to Clinton by Orrin Hatch as someone who would be acceptable to repubs. If Roberts was suggested from the dems as someone who would be acceptable, then answering questions wouldn't be as...

How about when they annoint themselves, like Ashcroft did with Crisco oil on the floor of the senate?