What is your opinion on game reviewers who obviously have no clue about the game they're reviewing?
Two recent examples:
Aliens: Colonial Marine - EGM review: http://www.egmnow.com/articles/reviews/egm-review-aliens-colonial-marines/
MGR - Revengence: http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2013/02/19/metal-gear-rising-revengeance-review-ps3/
Yes yes, everyone is entitle to his/ her opinion, however, these people also have a responsibility - and I'm not talking about 'warning' consumers about bad products.
I'm talking about Bonus payments in the gaming industry being linked to certain metacritic scores.
All of a sudden a competent developer can't get that money, because Jimmy Zithead decided to write review about a certain game and simply bash it to get pageviews...
So anyways - if you could talk about this,
would really make my day
Two recent examples:
Aliens: Colonial Marine - EGM review: http://www.egmnow.com/articles/reviews/egm-review-aliens-colonial-marines/
MGR - Revengence: http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2013/02/19/metal-gear-rising-revengeance-review-ps3/
Yes yes, everyone is entitle to his/ her opinion, however, these people also have a responsibility - and I'm not talking about 'warning' consumers about bad products.
I'm talking about Bonus payments in the gaming industry being linked to certain metacritic scores.
All of a sudden a competent developer can't get that money, because Jimmy Zithead decided to write review about a certain game and simply bash it to get pageviews...
So anyways - if you could talk about this,
would really make my day