I just wanted to make a couple of comments about criticism of the Live-Cast
First, Ive been listening to Cagcast for a long while now. and Ive enjoyed the evolution of the show. However, something that us cags cant possibly fathom is the hosts's thoughts about their own show. I mean we have seen you guys go from simple conversations, jokes, news rumors. Then interviews came about which are a great addition to your presentation, and speaks miles for professionalism in my opinion. Out of all people, you know your own progress, just making a point that it IS noticed, and its not bad to be reminded of that.
Eventually, though, the LIVECast came about, and I gotta say im not a technician or gadget wiz of any sort. I am pretty much astounded by the fact that you are able to do this and "still remain in your underwear". You are picking up calls, and Cagging in real life as I listen. Considering it is a maturing project, I understand that you guys are having some trouble with these technical difficulties.
More importantly however, I understand you guys do this because I imagine it can be terribly boring talking to the same Wombat and same CheapyD for 2 hours straight, recording, knowing that there is this void that will record all conversation. I mean, this has been going on for at least, what, 65 shows? I mean, you guys do talk throughout the week, dont you? I love some friends I have, but I too get tired of talking to ONLY them...So the possibility of having a dynamic show with listeners tuning in might inject a little excitement, at least for the hosts themselves...isnt that right, guys?
And yes, there are some technical problems, Im sure the internet had problems at the beginning.

, even the wheel had some bumps during the Beta (if you read that on the Cagcast you will totally make my week, It was either that one or saying "Even Christianity had some issues during Beta"). Maybe the Caggers will feel a little less critical if you had some sort of way of letting them know how much your show is improving technically. Im sure its some sort of learning process for you, since you ARE learning audio and video (maybe) editing, webmastering AND Japanese on the side, arent you? well, considering all this entertainment and services are free (technically speaking, I spend too much on deals, overcagging if you will), I think we should cut you both a little slack. But some sort of update about technical improvements wouldn't hurt every now and then, telling us something like "Hey guys, so now Wombat's voice won't sound as if he was just making out with his microphone anymore....so quit yo' bitch'n" like you did on #79
By the way, I would give Wombat more credit...but i REALLY dont know if he is sweating over this show as much as CheapyD is. If he is however, all I gotta say is that that is the curse of "behind-the-scenes" work. Regardless, Thank you guys.
I just think that its your damn show, and you are to do whatever you damn want with it, and I am totally greatful for it, but i know there is room for improvement, yet constructive criticism is pretty much the only way to complain and not sound like bitching.
PS Truth be told, Ive only listened to the edited portions of the Livecast, not in the actual LIVELY fashion, so I dont know how terrible those shows actually come out to be. But in all honesty, if they were really so bad, wouldnt the hosts moved on from that novelty already? Considering it was so bad, and such a monumental failure, why bother with more...the point is they bother with more, because it probably has potential.
So keep up the efforts, guys.
Im the kinda guy that thinks effort goes a long ways further than results.