[quote name='Dr Mario Kart']::head asplode::
If it didnt carry the Fallout name, I wouldnt care at all. I could just dismiss it as another shooter. It just bothers me to see old franchises getting disserviced in this way.
Shooters, and multiplayer action (in the case of RPGs), are infecting everything. Every RPG dev wants to be Tri-Ace now. Its mostly team based action-rpg, with Square-Enix leading the charge. Pure turn based is vanishing at a frightening speed.[/QUOTE]
I would prefer a turn based Fallout game, if it was 2D and had come out 7 years ago.
As it stands, Black Isle does not exist anymore and some people can accept that, others can't. Fallout 3 absolutely nails the Fallout atmosphere and universe. It's a great game. Not AS great as the old Fallout games were back then, but it'd be almost impossible for it to be with that old team gone. For good. I'm happy with what it is, because I get to be in that universe again and I get to kill radscorpions, and use Nuka-Cola, and make smartass replies.
VATS is what Fallout would be if it wasn't turn based. Things change, DMK. I would say that something along the lines of Valkyria Chronicles would probably be better, but the way things are with Fallout 3 are just fine. The game really does remind me of what I pictured the turn based battles playing out like when I played those games 10 years ago.
Crippling an enemy's leg so you can back away from them with enough AP left to attack without being attacked is just as valid an option here, except it's movement speed, not movement due to AP. Same goes with attacking limbs to remove weapons or again, attacking legs to catch up to someone who's running.
Fallout 3 is done better than anyone else in the industry could have done a sequel to Fallout in 2008, and still recieved a huge budget to do it with.

ing people drive me nuts. Of course you're going to dislike the game when you go in "dismissing it as another shooter" and expecting turn based. We've known for over a year it isn't going to be turn based!