[quote name='shrike4242']Mass Effect was written as a trilogy out of the gate, so some of the story was obviously left to the later games in the series. It's certainly a TV move like other shows that build up an overarching universe without things completely compartmentalized.
Would it have been nice to have a DA: O-type expansion to ME2 as a bridge to ME3? Yes, without question. Do I think they messed up with the DLC they did post-launch, including Arrival? Not to me, though I can see some people having issues with "bridge" DLC that ties in specifically to the next game.
As I've played Arrival on both of my ME2 playthroughs, I won't see if there's a "you didn't play Arrival in ME2, so we'll have to summarize what happened at the beginning of ME3" flag that gets set going into ME3 from the ME2 import.
Regardless, I liked the second half of Arrival much more than the first half. No question there. The solo aspect was a bit jarring compared to the rest of the gameplay in the beginning, though at the end, it made sense to me.
ME2's "story" was part of the larger story arc, where ME2 is the middle component to the Reaper saga.[/QUOTE]
You do a sequel like Empire Strikes back or Two Towers, not like ME2 where we clueless to what the threat is. Or maybe that was their intention? I think I beat on ME2 more so than a dead horse.
[quote name='hankmecrankme']I believe that ME was written as a trilogy with everything planned out about as much as I believe George Lucas had all 6 Star Wars movies planned out way in advance.[/QUOTE]
Totally had it planned, you have no idea how deep Lucas is.
[quote name='hankmecrankme']
Also a big fat
in' LOL at Cashcom.
[/QUOTE]
TAKE MY MONEY!!