MasterAwesome
CAGiversary!
In my opinion (which I think is reasonable enough), if you have one receiver with ridiculous stats rather than a number of receivers with respectable/realistic stats, that seems more indicative of your receiver's skills than your skills as a player. I'm not trying to call you out or anything, obviously you are a pretty darn good player...but you can't argue that it takes a lot more skill to incorporate different routes and receivers into your passing game than to just have a hand-full of designated plays where you just stare down one receiver who is able to get open every time. Having to search the whole field for who is open before taking a sack can be hard work, which is what QB's have to do in the real world every single game.
Again, this is all just my opinion...and I'm not trying to say anything bad about you or anyone else who primarily uses one dominant receiver. Like I mentioned last season back when we were trying to come up with these end-of-season awards: obviously your first priority is to do what gives you the best chance to win (which in your case, is throwing it to Mike Wallace); but when it comes time for the end-of-season awards, ridiculous stats are frowned upon and shouldn't be encouraged/positively reinforced (in my opinion of course). If you end up winning the Superbowl and someone else gets receiver-of-the-year...who is gonna come out on top there? Everyone's ultimate goal should be winning the Superbowl...these end-of-the-year awards should just be for fun. No one should ever complain about not winning some arbitrary, meaningless award that one guy comes up with on his own (assuming Doom does it himself again).
Again, this is all just my opinion...and I'm not trying to say anything bad about you or anyone else who primarily uses one dominant receiver. Like I mentioned last season back when we were trying to come up with these end-of-season awards: obviously your first priority is to do what gives you the best chance to win (which in your case, is throwing it to Mike Wallace); but when it comes time for the end-of-season awards, ridiculous stats are frowned upon and shouldn't be encouraged/positively reinforced (in my opinion of course). If you end up winning the Superbowl and someone else gets receiver-of-the-year...who is gonna come out on top there? Everyone's ultimate goal should be winning the Superbowl...these end-of-the-year awards should just be for fun. No one should ever complain about not winning some arbitrary, meaningless award that one guy comes up with on his own (assuming Doom does it himself again).