Update-played it quite a bit more, and while I do think it gets better, my initial impressions haven't really changed. I'll get into the control in a bit, but this really isn't a Metroid game.
The difficulty also seems uneven to me, with certain boss-type sequences past the point of fun to me.
[quote name='io']Actually, I think you are dead wrong here. I think it got a fairly wide range of scores PRECISELY because of complaints about the controls (only to those who wanted it to be just like the older games) or how un-Metroidy it was (ditto). Wasn't there one fairly low review that complained both that it brought nothing new to the series and ALSO that it wasn't enough like the original Metroid Prime (too linear or something)? Anyway, I couldn't wrap my head around that one. But I think SOME of your complaints are the very reason it didn't get universal 9.5 or 10's, which, IMO, it deserved. But I recognize it isn't for everyone and thus that explains the 8's and such - a much wider range than I expected.[/quote]
That isn't a wide range at all. Gamespot gave it a "great" score. In another forum I frequent the consensus on this is that (unfortunately) many of the types of people on display in this thread are what prevents real game criticism. Like I said, if there were a film, you'd probably see a lot of high scores, but also a lot of 5's and 6's, and probably below. That people would be 'outraged' over a near perfect score, or the very real criticisms brought up in this thread is frightening. There's religious fervor on display here that's embarrassing.
[quote name='RollingSkull']I never understood the whole "NEEDS TO BE MOAR METROIDY" impulse. I got Super Metroid on VC earlier and found it dreadfully dull compared to the Primes. Across the board, they always balance exploration and direction perfectly. Why people bitch about it is beyond me...[/QUOTE]
Presumably because we're fans of Metroid style gameplay. I'm not saying you're "wrong" to enjoy the game. But it isn't much at all like Metroid. I seek out as many Metroid style games as I can, and usually enjoy them. When I pick up a Metroid game, I expect it to play like Metroid. For long time gamers the name is synonymous with a certain style of gameplay that isn't on display here. So yeah, it's a disappointment, and obviously comparisons are going to be made to actual Metroid-style games that wouldn't have been made had this not used the Metroid license. I've played a free Metroid style game that some long guy made that's more fun (to me) and certainly plays more like Metroid than Prime 3 does.
[quote name='Kayden']

yourself. I wasn't bashing it. I didn't say its the stupidest

ing game ever and only a total dick monger would like it.
I said it bored me. I didn't care for it. I did not find it fun. In my own personal opinion, I did not find the game enjoyable for anyone who is me. And
in addition to that I commented on the positioning of the system. Yes, it added to my unenjoyment, but was far from the sole source...[/quote]
I think it's frightening commentary on humanity, frankly. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED CRITICISM! YOU MUST THINK LIKE US!
[quote name='Mr. Roper']I never beat the 1st 2 Primes and won't play this until I do so.
I dislike 3d puzzles in a first person shooter.
The original Metroid blows the Primes out of the water.
Still need to play super metroid, I am sure it is much better than this game too.[/QUOTE]
I've never had a chance to play Metroid Prime 2, but I felt the first one was remarkably successful doing a 3D Metroid game, and not a first person shooter with Metroid trappings. This game is VERY different from MP1, and like I said earlier it fulfills all the fears I had about that game.
IMO (and I think this is generally even agreed on) Metroid 1 and 3 are the best in the series, and since you enjoyed Metroid 1, it's almost a sure thing you're going to enjoy Metroid 3 (IMO 2 and 4 aren't as good, 4 in particular, and Metroid Prime 1 for me would be placed maybe between those two games).
[quote name='akushin']I don't understand how anyone could prefer an analog stick over this. In my opinion, the precision and speed of a wiimote are second (and this is debateable) only to a mouse. I can see why maybe if your hands or arms are ridiculously shakey an analog stick could make more sense, and if you have trouble pointing at things, the Wii probably wasn't ever for you in the first place.[/QUOTE]
I disagree. Beyond the issue that sunlight interferes with this, I find the Wiimote much less accurate than an analog stick, which is already much less accurate than a mouse. It's not unusable by any means, but an FPS that's well tuned for a stick has IMO more precision, and is just easier to deal with IMO. Not drastically so, but I find it faster and more accurate personally. Beyond that, with the Wii's scheme if you go past a certain point it looses track of the controller's position. I find it very difficult to really look "up" compared to a normal game.
It doesn't make the game unplayable, but I'd switch to a normal controller in a second if the option were available.
The other issue is just that I *like* how Metroid Prime intentionally deemphasized the first person shooter aspects, had a full lock on system that in some senses made the gameplay more similar to the 2D games. (Though I think you could still do the basic gameplay structure of Metroid in a game that controlled like an FPS.)