In the NL, I think zitto will be better for the next year or so, but look at the other 2 pitchers from the A's that went to the NL
Tim Hudson
REC
13-12 | SV
0 | ERA
4.86 | WHIP
1.44
Mark Mulder
REC
13-12 | SV
0 | ERA
4.86 | WHIP
1.44
You can argue that mulder was hurt, but it still was a mediocre season if you shave 2.00 er off his era
Zitto did have the best numbers, but isn't he somewhat flaky. Would a big city

him up like it has done to many other above avg pitchers. Over the past 3 years, his numbers vs decent teams
ANA 3 - 5 3.19 ERA
BOS 2 - 3 4.38
CHW 4 - 1 3.17
NYY 1 - 5 7.01
He is also below .500 in the past 3 years after the all star break, 18 - 21. He is a number 3 on a team that has a payroll of over 90mill. The yanks and red sox need pitching. In NY, he would be behind wang and mussina. In boston he would be behind Schilling, beckett, and I would put him behind pablebon as well. The mets are weak in starting pitching, and the only reason he would be ahead of glavine, is due to glavine in the back end of his career. 16mill a season for 4 years, is a lot to pay someone like zito for a guy that has more a tad over .500 years then he does dominant years. His last dominant year was 02. Since then 14 - 12, 11 - 11, 14 - 13, 16 - 10. It isn't like Oakland has been a bad team in those years. You can argue the weak offense, but Oakland has been in the playoffs, or in the hunt for the playoffs pretty much every year he has been there. They always seem to find a way to win. How do the other oakland pitchers get the W's and not him. Don't over rate either schmidt or zito, they are the best that is available, but hardly great pitchers
Would you put zitto ahead of j. santana or liranio on the twins? Would you put him ahead of garland, buherle or contreas on the whitesox? Is he even the best on his staff?