[quote name='paz9x']actually bowles was relevant, has good some good wins, and hasnt fought due to injury and will be in the upper echelon of that division when he returns.
banuelos has also never looked as good or dangerous as miguel has.
Like I said he has a punchers chance, he can KO miguel. hes not going to outpoint him or outwork him. hes nto goign to try and wrestle him and the only way he subs him is if, like benevidez, he rocks him and slaps a sub on a delerious torres.
And yes ive seen the lines for all the posted fights on 126.
You said torres was being overestimated, i disagreed, you dont need to try and show your superiority by referencing betting lines. You could simply convey disagreement by posting counterpoints, instead you supported my original opinion, that banuelos has a punchers chance.[/QUOTE]
I'm just saying, you posted your picks for the card with "lock" next to Torres' name. By no means he is a "lock", and there are certainly much better guys on the card who are all but guaranteed to win. Banuelos is the MUCH better striker, and the only thing Torres can do to win is try and take him down and outgrapple him. If he doesn't do that, he will be in danger for the whole fight. He's not as good a striker and doesn't have nearly enough power to stop Banuelos IMO.
Miguel gets too much hype for beating up mostly bums during his massive win streak. He's not a terrible fighter, but "Mr. I Can Beat Floyd Mayweather In A Boxing Match" is not nearly as good as he, or most people, think he is.
P.S. Brian Bowles is not great. His striking is somewhat tight, but he won't beat Cruz or Benevidez and probably not even Jorgensen, all of whom are "upper echelon" fighters.