[quote name='Clak']Sherlock was great, but way too short. That's the thing about British shows, they usually have really shorts seasons.[/QUOTE]
I think it was probably a couple of episodes short. I would've liked to see the newer version of Watson develop a little more before the Season was up. Then again there were essentially 6 episodes of a normal show, 3 one hr and a half movies, so it was good for a first season.
[quote name='Javery']I actually think US television seasons are WAY too long. IMO, there should be 4 "television seasons" per year of 13 weeks each. 9-10 new episodes and 3-4 weeks for reruns/other programming. Each show airs 9-10 new episodes per calendar year - that's it. This would result in higher quality TV, IMO because writers wouldn't be forced to stretch things out to fill time. This would also mean we'd get to watch more shows because you wouldn't have to devote so much time to each one. It would require less of a commitment from the TV studios too so they wouldn't feel like they needed to pull the plug after 3 or 4 episodes of a struggling series.
Extras and The Office were done perfectly - 2 seasons, 6 episodes each and an hour long special to wrap it up. Eastbound and Down is also going to end perfectly since the 3rd season is the last one and there will be a total of 20 episodes for the series. These shows were great but they left you wanting just a little bit more (unlike, say, The Office (US) which has been dead for at least 3 years but they keep making new episodes).[/QUOTE]
I agree, the networks that are doing this the best right now are AMC and USA. First seasons are usually much shorter anyway. Is Sherlock really considered a show with a season or a mini-series... or a continuous mini-series?