PlayStation 4 - General Discussion Thread

[quote name='htz']You act like the PS3 is going to die when the PS4 is going to be released. Production for the PS2 didn't end until a month or so ago. The PS3 is still above $200, it will have a long life ahead of it, maybe even longer than the PS2.[/QUOTE]

It won't be longer than the PS2 the PS2 lived so well because it sold more consoles than the others. The PS2 was destroying the Xbox in system sales it's one of the reason that Microsoft moved on to the 360 before Sony.
 
[quote name='guardian_owl']Aren't there going to be problems on games that use a select and start button?[/QUOTE]

I'd guess that the share feature won't work on those games so they just use that button as start or select.
 
[quote name='guardian_owl']Probably don't want to support the dual shock 3 to force people to buy the (what is sure to be) HIDEOUSLY expensive controllers, as you could still use the DS3 to play the theoretical gatakai streamed PS1, PS2, and PS3 games. Aren't there going to be problems on games that use a select and start button?[/QUOTE]

Some of the mockups for the PS4 controller had virtual buttons for Start & Select located at the bottom of the touchpad area.

1_640x360.jpg


I wish they had done the same for the Share button. Clearly they wanted to represent the importance of sharing on the new controller. I'd rather they had made that a virtual button as well in a small attempt at simplifying the controller and keeping the cost down. Even listing the Share feature an option when you pushed the Playstation button would have worked. Hopefully this controller won't super expensive, but I'm expecting at least a $60 price point.
 
[quote name='dmaul1114']
It's not so much the cables as it is consoles looking crappy all cluttered up on the TV stand shelves since it's in the living room. Cables aren't as bad now since most things are just power cord and hdmi cable to the receiver.

If consoles didn't run so damn hot I'd get an enclosed stand where I could just keep doors shut.[/QUOTE]

I have enclosed furniture (two young kids), and it's never been a problem. The back is open. On rare occasions where I feel like it might get too hot, I open the door for whatever console I'm using just while I'm using it.
 
I may look for something like that when I move then. Most of the enclosed ones I'd seen were closed in the back to and just had holes for cables.

Want to shell out and get some media racks with doors too to keep all my blurays, dvds, games etc. out of site as well.
 
Well, this one is supposed to be closed in the back, but the back is just some thin pressboard with a veneer that we chose not to attach. The rest of it looks nice and you can't tell the back isn't on.
 
[quote name='KillerRamen']Jimmy Fallon plays Killzone: Shadowfall

[/QUOTE]
Eh not to be a downer but while the game looks great graphics wise, it still looks like a normal FPS, the genre I been playing for like 15 years now. Also I was concerned that when Fallon asked will there be bigger worlds, and their response was basically no.

I sure hope game developers learn to not make the mistake of just because you have more power doesn't mean just take the same game and make it look prettier. I am tired of seeing generic hallway shooter.
 
[quote name='Xellos2099']I don;t see how the streaming thing will take off considering in US many people are under constant data cap...[/QUOTE]

My DSL connection from AT&T is so friggen slow that streaming anything more than Youtube is out of the question, and even that can barely run without constant buffering. Even when it comes to downloading games on PS+, anything more than a couple hundred megs is totally out of the question.
 
[quote name='Sir_Fragalot']Eh not to be a downer but while the game looks great graphics wise, it still looks like a normal FPS, the genre I been playing for like 15 years now. Also I was concerned that when Fallon asked will there be bigger worlds, and their response was basically no.

I sure hope game developers learn to not make the mistake of just because you have more power doesn't mean just take the same game and make it look prettier. I am tired of seeing generic hallway shooter.[/QUOTE]

It's still just a launch game. I'm just happy to see that it's playable and what they showed a few days ago wasn't pre-rendered. I'm also happy to see that the prototype controller is wireless.

We'll see more launch titles at E3, but I don't expect them to really start trying new things until Holiday 2014.
 
I wasn;t very impressed at what Sony showed. Killzone PS4 looks almost identical to the PS3 titles. Nothing new or innovative, Your usual FPS title. It seemed like they were under hyping the system instead of the usual overhyping it at these conferences.
No BC is a big downer for me. I don;t really want to have a PS3 and a PS4 under my tv just to play Last of us,beyond 2 souls, and other current/coming soon PS3 releases.
(PS4 ports of those games would be a welcomed way to fill in the gaps of lack of PS4 titles/BC)

I used the PS3 BC to play lots of PS2 games for a good 2 years after PS3 release just because there wasn't a whole lot of games for the system. And I would expect it to be the same for PS4 launch year as well. If they could figure out a way to have it included for launch systems it would be a day 1 purchase for me.

The controller looks okay I guess. I am glad it isnt a led/lcd screen, but it seems pretty useless at the same time. You will use it to scroll through menus? I will have to wait and actually see how they plan to take advantage of the touch screen.

8GB of RAM is like the new RIIIIIDGE RAAACER announcement. Pretty worthless to make it such a big deal imo. Majority of the people want to SEE the new capabilities of PS4 not just hear about from a paper specs sheet.
 
[quote name='Ivanhoe']I wasn;t very impressed at what Sony showed. Killzone PS4 looks almost identical to the PS3 titles. Nothing new or innovative, Your usual FPS title. It seemed like they were under hyping the system instead of the usual overhyping it at these conferences.
No BC is a big downer for me. I don;t really want to have a PS3 and a PS4 under my tv just to play Last of us,beyond 2 souls, and other current/coming soon PS3 releases.
(PS4 ports of those games would be a welcomed way to fill in the gaps of lack of PS4 titles/BC)

I used the PS3 BC to play lots of PS2 games for a good 2 years after PS3 release just because there wasn't a whole lot of games for the system. And I would expect it to be the same for PS4 launch year as well. If they could figure out a way to have it included for launch systems it would be a day 1 purchase for me.

The controller looks okay I guess. I am glad it isnt a led/lcd screen, but it seems pretty useless at the same time. You will use it to scroll through menus? I will have to wait and actually see how they plan to take advantage of the touch screen.

8GB of RAM is like the new RIIIIIDGE RAAACER announcement. Pretty worthless to make it such a big deal imo. Majority of the people want to SEE the new capabilities of PS4 not just hear about from a paper specs sheet.[/QUOTE]

You do know Sony is competing against Microsoft right? Why would they show all the cards when MS still hasn't even announced anything? I wish some of you would get that through ya thick heads. "Only Killzone and Infamous as the only launch titles, aww man.":roll: oh E3 is still coming and so are many other expos to show off more details and more games.
 
[quote name='spmahn']My DSL connection from AT&T is so friggen slow that streaming anything more than Youtube is out of the question, and even that can barely run without constant buffering. Even when it comes to downloading games on PS+, anything more than a couple hundred megs is totally out of the question.[/QUOTE]

Same thing I've been thinking.

Unless this streaming thing has some sort of elven magic I doubt it though. I'm pretty bummed that the backward compatibility issue will be resolved by "Cloud Gaming". That's no solution at all IMO.

If Microsoft steps up and says you'll be able to transfer over all your dl games, content, and still be able to play older disc based games I think I may pass on PS4. The odds of me getting a Wii-U are looking better. lol
 
The only thing that turns me off to this system (really gaming in general) is the share button concept. This idea that gaming needs to be social and that all my friends want me to plaster their twitter or facebook pages with my virtual conquests has to be a generational thing. I am 38 and most of my friends could care less about my gaming habits. Otherwise I liked what Sony presented. I just do not expect games in genral to change as much with each generation to be honest. What I do not like is adding features like the share button which honestly is a feature that just distracts developers from making the best game possible. Having to worry about integrating this into your game is not something I want developers to be worried about.
 
[quote name='cancerman1120']The only thing that turns me off to this system (really gaming in general) is the share button concept. This idea that gaming needs to be social and that all my friends want me to plaster their twitter or facebook pages with my virtual conquests has to be a generational thing. I am 38 and most of my friends could care less about my gaming habits. Otherwise I liked what Sony presented. I just do not expect games in genral to change as much with each generation to be honest. What I do not like is adding features like the share button which honestly is a feature that just distracts developers from making the best game possible. Having to worry about integrating this into your game is not something I want developers to be worried about.[/QUOTE]

integrating what? The whole process seems to be almost entirely OS based. The vita already has a similar sort of newsfeed, that tells you when a friend has earned a trophy, or bought something, etc. I dont think much is any developer sources go into being able to capture or share between friends.
 
Did anyone else laugh when Jonathan Blow basically made fun of the entire PS4 event with his comment as he was getting ready to present his game "The Witness?" I thought it was pretty humorous..
 
[quote name='edson13']integrating what? The whole process seems to be almost entirely OS based. The vita already has a similar sort of newsfeed, that tells you when a friend has earned a trophy, or bought something, etc. I dont think much is any developer sources go into being able to capture or share between friends.[/QUOTE]

Ok well that is all fine then but I am still not a fan.
 
Well sounds like the used games are not going to come without a cost of some sort. I expected it somewhat but it still sucks.

Sony needs to look ahead and not worry about this crap. It will be a non issue in time and I would have hoped Sony would realize this and just let it go for now and not potentially alienate anyone over it. I really hope they are not doing this just because MS may be. It's a huge opportunity for Sony to win the "hearts and minds" of gamers if they just let it go.

[quote name='TheOpusFuller']Did anyone else laugh when Jonathan Blow basically made fun of the entire PS4 event with his comment as he was getting ready to present his game "The Witness?" I thought it was pretty humorous..[/QUOTE]
Yep, summed up my feelings on the games shown. I'm not really worried about it long term but still I would have hoped for something different. There was Knack I guess but it didn't look all that interesting.

If some of the games shown are the only big launch/window games (and I'm not saying I think that will actually be the case) the PS4 could be in trouble short term. People don't want a $500 Killzone Box.
 
[quote name='Ivanhoe']8GB of RAM is like the new RIIIIIDGE RAAACER announcement. Pretty worthless to make it such a big deal imo. Majority of the people want to SEE the new capabilities of PS4 not just hear about from a paper specs sheet.[/QUOTE]

For me the biggest news was the details about the RAM. I was worried they were going to cut corners and only offer 4GB, not only did they go with 8GB but they went the extra mile and made it DDR5.

RAM often seems to be the key bottleneck for performance. There's the story about how Microsoft was originally planning on giving the 360 256MB before Epic convinced them to do 512. Six years later 360 games and PS3 games are starting to look a little rough as is, imagine what they would look like if developers only had half the memory to work with.
 
I am not worried about the used game issue either. If it ends up being something like a $10 cost it will just mean the used market will adjust. You will get less for your used game and they will cost less to buy. You already see that often with games that have online passes. It just means the developers get a sliver of the used market, GS keeps on making money and we get games for cheaper than MSRP.
 
[quote name='Thrinn']For me the biggest news was the details about the RAM. I was worried they were going to cut corners and only offer 4GB, not only did they go with 8GB but they went the extra mile and made it DDR5.

RAM often seems to be the key bottleneck for performance. There's the story about how Microsoft was originally planning on giving the 360 256MB before Epic convinced them to do 512. Six years later 360 games and PS3 games are starting to look a little rough as is, imagine what they would look like if developers only had half the memory to work with.[/QUOTE]

I think one of the reasons why Sony went overkill with RAM was because of often it appeared to be the biggest reason as to why PS3 games of multi-platform games ran worse. Not only is there tons of memory but it's fast as hell GDDR5 (I think PCs are still using DDR3). I don't understand it all completely, but the memory is shared between the system and the graphics card, so really, it's probably not that unreasonable. Plus, John Carmack seems to like what Sony did.

Also, I'm guessing RAM will probably play a huge role in the "sharing" BS and a lot of the background stuff...
 
[quote name='cancerman1120']The only thing that turns me off to this system (really gaming in general) is the share button concept. This idea that gaming needs to be social and that all my friends want me to plaster their twitter or facebook pages with my virtual conquests has to be a generational thing. I am 38 and most of my friends could care less about my gaming habits. Otherwise I liked what Sony presented. I just do not expect games in genral to change as much with each generation to be honest. What I do not like is adding features like the share button which honestly is a feature that just distracts developers from making the best game possible. Having to worry about integrating this into your game is not something I want developers to be worried about.[/QUOTE]

Nobody is going to force you to press that share button.
 
[quote name='iamsmart']I just realized something... a new playstation that can't play old PS3 games (in the traditional sense) might be a bit of a kiss of death for Dust 514. Seems like a bit of a waste to spend so much time creating a long-term online shooter only to have it marginalized by a new system months after launch.[/QUOTE]

Same goes for Final Fantasy 14, which hasn't even started the PS3 beta yet. So it'll be released even closer to PS4 launch.

Not saying these games will do bad as many or almost everyone will keep their PS3's, but more a slight on PS4. I don't want to hook up that many (plus other competing systems from Nintendo/Microsoft/Valve) to my TV at once. And I'm not seeing any reason to buy a PS4 in the first place. I can wait 1-2 years and pick up the next gen exclusives for $20 (or multiplat ones on Steam as they come out), and the console $100+ cheaper.

Not catering to early adopters is a bad idea, imo. Sure the tech-o-philes buy stuff day 1, but is that enough of an install base?

[quote name='crunchewy']Apparently Sony is being vague about used games on PS4. Not willing to talk about the details. What seems like a straight forward thing - put disc in and play - is apparently not straight forward, which implies... something:

http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/21/yoshida-used-games-caveat/[/QUOTE]

I read something on Eurogamer that Sony mentioned "it's up to the developers or publishers". So it sounds like locked save data issue, where the option was there to lock out USB backup saved data, or not. I now 100% assume the option will be there, so EA can get that "offline used game pass" $10 on EVERY used game, not just online pass. It looks like the next step in evolution before PS5/etc are digital only.

Just for more speculation, either Gamestop lowers the price of all next gen used games by $10, or they make a deal and print out the codes on your receipt, like they did for Batman Arkham City, I believe. I think this could bring a video game industry crash, because then any used game bought (from certain publishers) means you need to have your console online, and pay a fee, and a lot of consoles are not online in the first place. Maybe it will open publishers eyes to used games have never hurt the industry, but instead have helped it grow.
 
[quote name='spatenfloot']Nobody is going to force you to press that share button.[/QUOTE]

Who said anything about forcing me to press it? I said I do not like the direction. If that is the big "hook" of the next generation of gaming then I would say they are not interested in the same things I am. I want bigger games with more immersion, not the ability to send a video of my best kills from COD to my friends facebook page.
 
[quote name='cancerman1120']Who said anything about forcing me to press it? I said I do not like the direction. If that is the big "hook" of the next generation of gaming then I would say they are not interested in the same things I am. I want bigger games with more immersion, not the ability to send a video of my best kills from COD to my friends facebook page.[/QUOTE]

I agree with you. My niece was trying to chat with me over XBL the day I started playing Skyrim. Talk about a non-immersive experience? Couldn't get into the game until she went offline. I can't imagine being constantly inundated by social media bullshit.
 
[quote name='cancerman1120']Who said anything about forcing me to press it? I said I do not like the direction. If that is the big "hook" of the next generation of gaming then I would say they are not interested in the same things I am. I want bigger games with more immersion, not the ability to send a video of my best kills from COD to my friends facebook page.[/QUOTE]

Also agree with this basically. The feature itself is gimmicky crap to me personally, but I'd be ok with it as a general feature in a menu. Dedicating a controller button to it though is a dumb decision imo.

I want a game to make fun of it and say something like: To begin the game, press the Start Share button. Or maybe Saints Row could make it their new "awesome" button.
 
[quote name='Vinny']I think one of the reasons why Sony went overkill with RAM was because of often it appeared to be the biggest reason as to why PS3 games of multi-platform games ran worse. Not only is there tons of memory but it's fast as hell GDDR5 (I think PCs are still using DDR3). I don't understand it all completely, but the memory is shared between the system and the graphics card, so really, it's probably not that unreasonable. Plus, John Carmack seems to like what Sony did.

Also, I'm guessing RAM will probably play a huge role in the "sharing" BS and a lot of the background stuff...[/QUOTE]
First up, unless Microsoft has radically upgraded its graphics and memory configuration for Durango in the last nine months (an engineering nightmare unlikely to happen - it can't really add more chips as Sony has done), the PlayStation makers have less to worry about in terms of any direct hardware comparisons with their competition.

From an engineering perspective, it's a remarkable achievement. Sony itself doesn't fabricate memory, it buys from major suppliers who advertise the parts available months (sometimes years) ahead of delivery, so we have a decent idea of what options the platform holders have on the table in creating their next-gen systems. The GDDR5 memory modules - the same used in PC graphics cards - are only available in certain configurations, with the densest option available offering 512MB per module. The startling reality is that unless Sony has somehow got access to a larger chip that isn't yet in mass production and that nobody knows about, it has crammed 16 memory modules onto its PS4 motherboard. To illustrate the extent of the achievement, Nvidia's $1000 graphics card - the GeForce Titan - offers "just" 6GB of onboard GDDR5.

Source: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-spec-analysis-playstation-4
Click to expand...
^If the rumored xbox durango specs are correct, Sony might have won on the hardware front for next-gen.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/...balanced-approach-to-building-a-game-console/
 
[quote name='htz']^If the rumored xbox durango specs are correct, Sony might have won on the hardware front for next-gen.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/...balanced-approach-to-building-a-game-console/[/QUOTE]

Thanks for that article, it's a much more in depth than anything else I've seen.

EDIT* So... reading that, I now understand why the PS4 can't play PS3 games natively. And I'm really disappointed that it simply won't happen unless Sony probably spends an ungodly amount of time/money into software emulation or make more money by re-selling PS3 games again or keep their PS3s around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='Blaster man']I agree with you. My niece was trying to chat with me over XBL the day I started playing Skyrim. Talk about a non-immersive experience? Couldn't get into the game until she went offline. I can't imagine being constantly inundated by social media bullshit.[/QUOTE]

You could tell her no? Or is that impossible?

If it's such a big deal and you're trying to be immersed into the game sign out of XBL while you're playing.


I personally love the social aspects and seeing what my friends are playing/have played/etc...

Being able to stream will be nice and tons of people will use that, and if something cool happens in a game like a weird glitch or something being able to share it is a nice feature.
 
[quote name='whoknows']
I personally love the social aspects and seeing what my friends are playing/have played/etc...

Being able to stream will be nice and tons of people will use that, and if something cool happens in a game like a weird glitch or something being able to share it is a nice feature.[/QUOTE]

I think everyone sees "social" differently. I don't get what's so social about sitting on your couch by yourself and talking to your friends who are sitting in their couches in their homes and playing games. It's so... disconnected. To me, Mario Kart in one room with 4 (or more) friends and seeing their tears of agony in person is social. Or getting drunk at a bar. I get that that's not always possible but that's part of what makes the times you actually do get together all that much more fun.

And when I can't get together with them, I play the games I like... and I honestly don't care to see what my friends are doing in CoD or Madden and I doubt they care to see what I'm doing Ni No Kuni.
 
[quote name='Vinny']I think everyone sees "social" differently. I don't get what's so social about sitting on your couch by yourself and talking to your friends who are sitting in their couches in their homes and playing games. It's so... disconnected. To me, Mario Kart in one room with 4 (or more) friends and seeing their tears of agony in person is social. Or getting drunk at a bar. I get that that's not always possible but that's part of what makes the times you actually do get together all that much more fun.

And when I can't get together with them, I play the games I like... and I honestly don't care to see what my friends are doing in CoD or Madden and I doubt they care to see what I'm doing Ni No Kuni.[/QUOTE]

I care.
 
[quote name='spatenfloot']Nobody is going to force you to press that share button.[/QUOTE]

As someone said earlier, get that logic shit outta here!
 
[quote name='renique46']As someone said earlier, get that logic shit outta here![/QUOTE]

It is not about logic. Simply saying you do not have to use it does not change the fact Sony thinks it is the "future" of gaming. The resources used to focus on adding more social features are not what I want. Others people may want this and that is fine but it scares me that the next generation is less about the games and more about being "connected". As other people have said they are trying to substitute actual shared experiences with this pseudo-social sharing. I understand people cannot always be in the same room together for a gaming experience and that is fine but this always connected always sharing idea is not a real substitute. If anything it degrades your relationship with people. I know this because if all of us were in a room together right now having this conversation it would be very different. I game to disconnect from reality not substitute reality with my gaming. Maybe I am making more out of this then it really is but lets remember the big push at this reveal was the social aspect of the PS4. It was front and center of the presentation. A dedicated button says a lot about the focus of the company. I would have loved a demo of BF4 running on the PS4 with 64 people playing MP. That would have made me stand up and say they understand what I want as a gamer. To me THAT is the type of social connection I want my games to focus on. Improve my experience within the game. I don't need them to help me stay connected with my friends. I will pick up a phone to do that.
 
[quote name='cancerman1120']It is not about logic. Simply saying you do not have to use it does not change the fact Sony thinks it is the "future" of gaming. The resources used to focus on adding more social features are not what I want. Others people may want this and that is fine but it scares me that the next generation is less about the games and more about being "connected". As other people have said they are trying to substitute actual shared experiences with this pseudo-social sharing. I understand people cannot always be in the same room together for a gaming experience and that is fine but this always connected always sharing idea is not a real substitute. If anything it degrades your relationship with people. I know this because if all of us were in a room together right now having this conversation it would be very different. I game to disconnect from reality not substitute reality with my gaming. Maybe I am making more out of this then it really is but lets remember the big push at this reveal was the social aspect of the PS4. It was front and center of the presentation. A dedicated button says a lot about the focus of the company. I would have loved a demo of BF4 running on the PS4 with 64 people playing MP. That would have made me stand up and say they understand what I want as a gamer. To me THAT is the type of social connection I want my games to focus on. Improve my experience within the game. I don't need them to help me stay connected with my friends. I will pick up a phone to do that.[/QUOTE]

I agree with most of what you are saying. My bigger fear of future of the industry is really how they are going more digital. Wii has some problems transferring digital content as far as re buying goes. PSN games are apparently going to have a road block as well transferring to the PS4 as well.
 
[quote name='Blaster man']I agree with you. My niece was trying to chat with me over XBL the day I started playing Skyrim. Talk about a non-immersive experience? Couldn't get into the game until she went offline. I can't imagine being constantly inundated by social media bullshit.[/QUOTE]

This is why I don't own a mic, and when I do play ME3 multiplayer I always leave lobbies with people who do have mics on. It's annoying to listen to someone else breath, cough, chat with their spouses, etc, while playing.

Also not a fan of all the social crap the game companies think EVERY person that buys a console wants. I don't want to link a game to facebook, or post screenshots to twitter. To me that's just nonsense. I don't even know anyone in real life that games, let alone cares what I just did in Skyrim.
 
[quote name='Jodou']Everyone should give this a watch. Hilarious and grounded in reality. I fucking lost it when he started talking about Destiny. :lol:[/QUOTE]

This guy is awesome. I watched his video last week about the PS4 leading up to the announcement and loved it. He's just so real and funny imo. Hope to see more of him at least through the console launches.
 
I'd never use the share feature, but don't care that its there.

I'm not much into social stuff with gaming writer as gaming is a few rungs down my hobby list and only a couple of my friends play games at all. And one of them is PC only the past couple years and I don't do PC gaming.

I mostly just set my status to appear offline on the Xbox unless I'm wanting to play online. PS3 I don't worry as I have no real life friends. Just a few CAGs on the friends list that I've never gamed with since I don't so any mp on the ps3.
 
[quote name='ShockandAww']This guy is awesome. I watched his video last week about the PS4 leading up to the announcement and loved it. He's just so real and funny imo. Hope to see more of him at least through the console launches.[/QUOTE]
I think they're probably going to get him serialized because there's tons of material for him to work with and he's legitimately funny. I really think GT struck gold with that first video and I hope they don't change a thing, as his set is too perfect; like a Milton (Office Space) of GT lol.
 
[quote name='dmaul1114']I'd never use the share feature, but don't care that its there.

I'm not much into social stuff with gaming writer as gaming is a few rungs down my hobby list and only a couple of my friends play games at all. And one of them is PC only the past couple years and I don't do PC gaming.

I mostly just set my status to appear offline on the Xbox unless I'm wanting to play online. PS3 I don't worry as I have no real life friends. Just a few CAGs on the friends list that I've never gamed with since I don't so any mp on the ps3.[/QUOTE]

I would set my self as offline a lot more but sites like Raptr and 360voice.com cannot log your play times and achievement tracking if you do that. It is the only real reason I keep myself visible online unless I am planning on doing MP stuff.
 
[quote name='cancerman1120']I would set my self as offline a lot more but sites like Raptr and 360voice.com cannot log your play times and achievement tracking if you do that. It is the only real reason I keep myself visible online unless I am planning on doing MP stuff.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I don't use any of that stuff. I don't even care about trophies/achievements, much less play time etc.
 
[quote name='ShockandAww']This guy is awesome. I watched his video last week about the PS4 leading up to the announcement and loved it. He's just so real and funny imo. Hope to see more of him at least through the console launches.[/QUOTE]
Yeah same here. I watched his 1st video before the PS4 announcement. I was curious why I never saw him before on GT, didn't know that it was his 1st. I can say I'm a fan of his videos now. :)
 
Anyone have any info/thoughts on continuation of the trophy system. I really hope we just can maintain the same PSN account and just add on trophies to our existing total. Same goes for the next Xbox and achievements.
 
[quote name='cancerman1120']Anyone have any info/thoughts on continuation of the trophy system. I really hope we just can maintain the same PSN account and just add on trophies to our existing total. Same goes for the next Xbox and achievements.[/QUOTE]

I had always assumed that would be the case seeing how the vita worked with trophies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top