[quote name='MightySlacker']Are you kidding?!
I have my facts straight thanks. SHOW ME AN ATLUS GH TITLE. Wait, there isn't one. There is absolutely no incentive for Atlus to make any of their titles GH. 90% of their games they don't even PRODUCE significant numbers of them, much less sell them. I'd argue that Disgaea was their most successful selling title of all time, and it won't be a GH title. Atlus people are not like other companies - they realize half the reason their games are remotely successful is they are NICHE titles that are hard to find. It's the antithesis of GH.
And your link doesn't mean anything, it would only help my argument. Konami would have incentive to make DDR a GH title - DDR exploded in popularity after that game was released, and since it is compatible with PS2 they could have a reasonable expectation that they could make some $. Atlus would never give the go ahead for one of their obscure titles to go GH for a system that's pretty much been dead for 3 or 4 years.
Dave[/QUOTE]
No, you really should kick yourself in the face.
When have I mentioned a Atlus title turning GH?
The link does mean something (explained later on in the post) and I suggest you stop trying to twist stuff into your favor especially when it makes no sense.
Quotes from you:
"why the

would they make a new round of GH games."
"And your link doesn't mean anything, it would only help my argument."
How does that help your argument again?
Since you had so much trouble understanding my original post I'm going to break it down easy for you. This way you can understand it better.
"This is 2005 and that's with little searching:
http://wire.ign.com/articles/592/592820p1.html"
Explanation for above quote:
As for the DDR greatest hits link. It actually doesn't help your cause. That link is in response to this part of your post: "Playstation games have all but virtually ceased to be made, why the

would they make a new round of GH games." The link for DDR proves that they are still making new rounds of PSX GH titles in 2005.
"I don't think that Rhapsody is greatest hits."
Explanation for above quote:
I tried to stay neutral in the beginning, but this is my opinion on the subject of Rhapsody turning GH and my response to this:"when the hell have you EVER seen an Atlus game go GH?"
"I just came into the topic to throw around facts about GH titles in my previous post, because other users were guessing at what makes a title greatest hits."
Explanation for above quote:
Re-iterating that I came into this topic to inform people about the GH title requirement. Not to be jumped all over as if I am taking the Rhapsody GH side, when I have not mentioned anything in my original post about Rhapsody turning GH. Actually, I have yet to mention that Rhapsody will become GH in any of my posts. So quit assuming I did.
"But since you said: "Whoever mentioned the words "Greatest Hits" should be kicked in the face." I felt obliged to answer."
Explanation for above quote:
Since you said this so rudely: "Whoever mentioned the words "Greatest Hits" should be kicked in the face." I was one of the ones that said the words "Greatest Hits" in this topic. Meaning you said that I should get a kick in the face for mentioning the words "Greatest Hits". I felt I should reply because why should I get kicked in the face for just bringing up facts about Greatest Hits process?
"Maybe you should kick yourself in the face and get your facts straight about PSX GH titles."
Explanation of above quote:
That was in response to this: "why the

would they make a new round of GH games." Obviously, you don't know your facts about PSX GH titles. Just so happens they made a new round of GH titles in 2005. I decided to use a similar insult line that you used.
"Have a nice day."
Explanation for above quote:
That brings an end to my post.
"-Morpheus"
Explanation of above quote:
That's a signature.
Take care.
-Morpheus