[quote name='Megamibeast']Yeah I'm going to try the Dord method. I enter 50 in one time slot and lost.[/QUOTE]
I tried doing that method within the last 2 weeks. I used 95 codes 3x31+2 in 6 hrs. My brother used 100 this week too, codes 4x10, 25 codes 4x6, and 34x3 in 11 drawings. I've used 2 codes in different drawings like 20 times.
I think it's better, IMO, to take say 200 codes, put it in one drawing, and maybe by not just going in and dumping all 200 in at once, but keep comming back to the drawing for example other the 3 days it's open put in 4 of your codes per every other 20 codes other contestants put in. Or maybe going 10x20, 20x10, 40x5, 50x4, or 100x2.
Maybe if your the first to put in 200 of 1000, the computer doesn't randomize your name as 1 in 5, but it keeps your entries as 1-200 of 1000.
What if it picks 201st code entered you lost, just like some people win with 300, and some lose with 300. One person might of had their 300 between entry 200 & 499, and the 499th was picked and they won. Another person with 300 might have submitted all their codes from 500 to 799 in the same contest and lost.. Though if you go first it might randomize a winning code for you first, or it may randomize all entries together. There are so many possibilities there's no sure way to no whats best.
Anyway the each contest has went up to about an 1200-1400 average so it will be even tougher to win with the 3-5 poiint method. More people are probably putting 20-30 points in each by now. I'm guessing Dord and others who won with the 3 point spread method just got lucky win drawings were smaller and the average codes per person were 3.
I'm going for the 12:00am drawing this Sunday 9/25. I put the rest of my points in it, 360. I just said F-it and went all in. I put all 360 in as soon as that time slot opened, I think I was the first to enter it.