The OTT To End This Nonsense©

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just beat Jade empire. It was too easy. I only had three tough battles. If you ever play it focus on these Martial Arts. Leaping Tiger, Paralyzing Palm, Spirit Thief, Flawless, Staff, and One of the ranged magic arts like fire or ice. Though you really only need the first three. Also, Fire Toad is nice because it comes with immunities.
 
[quote name='Ugamer_X']In all seriousness, you all shouldn't be getting on Z for this. It's not so much Kittie that he cares about, as it is CAG itself. He's doing this for the good of the board and some people will be thanking him later.

I, on the other hand, start topics like these because I know people like supadupacheap (or whatever his name is) will get their panties up in a bunch and make it necesary to add their two cents as to why they hate me so much...or why I'm Jimmie's sidekick/boyfriend. But at the end of the day, I'm entertained by it all.[/QUOTE]

The thing is, I'm loath to believe that he IS doing it for the good of the board.
If he were, there are much better ways to go about it, and you'd want your data far more complete before metioning such a thing.
IMDB lists the releases of some of the movies kittie claimed to be in as 1997, meaning it would be filming while she was 16 or 17 based on her listed birthday. However, IMDB runs on a great deal of unverified and volunteered data. There are many other CAGs that knew of this and other things that question the veracity of kittie's story, but without a concrete date or a legal or at least verifiable document, it's not worth the trouble, as all it does is spawn threads just like this.
 
[quote name='zewone']To anyone that doesn't care about the "lina" shit you don't have to post about it. We get you don't care. That doesn't make you cool. Keep posting about your geeky things. You don't care about "lina" and we don't care about your day.[/QUOTE]

I don't care that you don't care that they don't care. So there!
 
[quote name='zewone']I can't believe any of you guys are giving me shit.

Unless you read the myspace and all the other comments from her friends and tell me it doesn't sound legit then your opinion holds no weight.

And if you don't care enough to read most of the myspace convos then don't post saying, "I can't believe zewone believed that."[/QUOTE]

Other myspace comments don't hold any weight either since they're just as anonymous as any CAGers here. As I said, the only valid form of evidence is a webcam with audio of the person in question acknowledging either CAG or the myspace account as hers or an industry website associated with her verifiying the same.
 
[quote name='JSweeney']The thing is, I'm loath to believe that he IS doing it for the good of the board.
If he were, there are much better ways to go about it, and you'd want your data far more complete before metioning such a thing.
IMDB lists the releases of some of the movies kittie claimed to be in as 1997, meaning it would be filming while she was 16 or 17 based on her listed birthday. However, IMDB runs on a great deal of unverified and volunteered data. There are many other CAGs that knew of this and other things that question the veracity of kittie's story, but without a concrete date or a legal or at least verifiable document, it's not worth the trouble, as all it does is spawn threads just like this.[/QUOTE]
I am doing it for the boards. Just because I don't my ways aren't as lame as yours doesn't mean I'm not.
 
IMDB lists the releases of some of the movies kittie claimed to be in as 1997, meaning it would be filming while she was 16 or 17 based on her listed birthday.

Lol... IMDB is not the place to be looking for correct porn information.
 
[quote name='Ugamer_X']I like how people still call this "beating a dead horse" too. Yet, making references to a grown man lusting for 12 year olds is completely new and original every time it's brought up. It's too bad we don't have a mod who deletes posts and changes topic titles when stuff like that gets repeated.[/QUOTE]


?????
jesussub4tv.jpg
 
[quote name='zewone']Who's in the pics kittie?[/QUOTE]

"Who's in the pics, Jessica Beeman?" would have been more hard-hitting, and caused me to quake.
 
[quote name='kittie']"Who's in the pics, Jessica Beeman?" would have been more hard-hitting, and caused me to quake.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but I didn't have to do all that. So are you gonna answer my original question?

Who's in the pics, kittie?
 
Zewone, if you are in contact with the MySpace Karlie (ie: real Karlie), then why don't you ask her to put a picture up on myspace with a sign that says something like: "I'm not on CAG". If we can't get this dumbass to post a pic, we might as well get someone.

She won't be able to deny that.
 
[quote name='Greetard']Zewone, if you are in contact with the MySpace Karlie (ie: real Karlie), then why don't you ask her to put a picture up on myspace with a sign that says something like: "I'm not on CAG". If we can't get this dumbass to post a pic, we might as well get someone.

She won't be able to deny that.[/QUOTE]
I asked her to already. I'm waiting for a reply.
 
[quote name='zewone']I am doing it for the boards. Just because I don't my ways aren't as lame as yours doesn't mean I'm not.[/QUOTE]

You don't seem to grasp the idea of being objective.
Good, valuable proof is that is both verifiable and irrefutable.
That myspace is not good data, as it does not uniquely identify the person who created it. It's just as likely that the person who created it is the liar as it is that kittie would be the liar.

You're letting your vendetta blind you, and your "proof" is weakened because of it.

You may think you're making great headway, but your methods are weak, and you have proven little that hasn't already been said ad naseum.
 
[quote name='JSweeney']You don't seem to grasp the idea of being objective.
Good, valuable proof is that is both verifiable and irrefutable.
That myspace is not good data, as it does not uniquely identify the person who created it. It's just as likely that the person who created it is the liar as it is that kittie would be the liar.

You're letting your vendetta blind you, and your "proof" is weakened because of it.

You may think you're making great headway, but your methods are weak, and you have proven little that hasn't already been said ad naseum.[/QUOTE]

Have you seen the real life pics I posted? Tell me when has kittie posted those?
 
[quote name='kittie']Lol... IMDB is not the place to be looking for correct porn information.[/QUOTE]

However, IMDB runs on a great deal of unverified and volunteered data.

Thus why it was drawn into question. It's weak data, no doubt.
Now, the best data would be the actual filming dates taken from the person holding the record for the film company. (Due to laws requiring that all actors be over 18, porn companies must obviously keep detailed records).

That data would be far more compelling that IMDB, and worlds more compelling than a myspace.
 
[quote name='Mouse']Why is there so much needless drama in the OTT?[/QUOTE]
Let's just blame Nigel while he's gone, okay?

It's all your fault, you comic book store running jerk!
 
[quote name='zewone']Have you seen the real life pics I posted? Tell me when has kittie posted those?[/QUOTE]

Those are much better. You should have lead with the real life pictures, and then introduced the myspace later on if people began to question the source.
Done in that fashion, the argument would be far more compelling.
 
[quote name='Mouse']Why is there so much needless drama in the OTT?[/QUOTE]

Because they're always after me Lucky Charms?
 
[quote name='JSweeney']Those are much better. You should have lead with the real life pictures, and then introduced the myspace later on if people began to question the source.
Done in that fashion, the argument would be far more compelling.[/QUOTE]
But, I wanted to see how much I have to throw out. You don't want to show your whole hand in the begining.
 
[quote name='zewone']Awesome. I love how you don't address the birth date change or the guy in the pictures with Jessica.[/QUOTE]
:cool:
 
[quote name='JSweeney']Because they're always after me Lucky Charms?[/QUOTE]
If the stupid Shaq-Fus try and take your Lucky Charms then smack them back down.

Case in point: people are complaining about someone's MySpace, whether someone is posting here or not, Whether Kittie did kiddie-porn, yadda yadda yadda. This is the type of stuff PMs are for. The OTT is for randomness, and that's what I expect.

From now until I feel like it this OTT is under Martiall Law. No more sappy drama-filled crap, and more stuff that entertains the Mouse. Got it?

Here's an example:
4.jpg




Now I wanna see more girls in wet t-shirts, or there'll be hell to pay.
 
[quote name='zewone'][/QUOTE]

That's not really solid proof. For all you know, those pics could've been taken from another site from a person who has previously /is dating Karlie. Plus there's the inevitable photochop. Oh look, what do we have here? If I put a bit more effort, I could scour the web for billions of pics of various ppl and throw them in. And I consider my skillz to be paltry. Can you imagine what someone of even more skillz than my meager ones can do?

lennycopy2tr.jpg
 
[quote name='zewone']But, I wanted to see how much I have to throw out. You don't want to show your whole hand in the begining.[/QUOTE]

True, but you kind of did, introducing the myspace...unless you have another source.

As an aside, I'll never understand why people have myspaces, etc...
Is it ego? A need for attention? I mean, I could understand the value of a password protected site that you share with family and friends, but a public site?
I just don't get it.
 
[quote name='jaykrue']That's not really solid proof. For all you know, those pics could've been taken from another site from a person who has previously /is dating Karlie. Plus there's the inevitable photochop. Oh look, what do we have here? If I put a bit more effort, I could scour the web for billions of pics of various ppl and throw them in. And I consider my skillz to be paltry. Can you imagine what someone of even more skillz than my meager ones can do?

lennycopy2tr.jpg
[/QUOTE]
Where are you going to find real life pics of a c-class porn star and make a fake myspace account as them. These pics are from Jessica's myspace. Not the dude in the picture.
 
Dood that's lenny Cravits.

And in the word's of the Trinity Broadcasting Channel, "Your love gifts help support this post."

I'm going to pump some iron and then do an hour of cardio.
 
[quote name='kittie']Sweeney, we need to play something on Live again.[/QUOTE]

I guess he doesn't.

And this will hit 500 at a record rate. :p
 
[quote name='jaykrue']That's not really solid proof. For all you know, those pics could've been taken from another site from a person who has previously /is dating Karlie. Plus there's the inevitable photochop. Oh look, what do we have here? If I put a bit more effort, I could scour the web for billions of pics of various ppl and throw them in. And I consider my skillz to be paltry. Can you imagine what someone of even more skillz than my meager ones can do?

http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/1166/lennycopy2tr.jpg[/QUOTE]


I really can't think of anything that could be provided here that would prove this and end things once and for all... and if there was, it would likely be something that a reasonable person wouldn't provide to a group of total strangers over the internet.

However, I'm actually surprised that no one played devil's advocate and tried to advance the theory that kittie may not be Karlie Montana, yet wholeheartedly BELIEVES that she is.
 
[quote name='zewone']Where are you going to find real life pics of a c-class porn star and make a fake myspace account as them. These pics are from Jessica's myspace. Not the dude in the picture.[/QUOTE]

It's the internet. If I tried real hard, I could find very realistic pictures of George Bush fellating Saddam. It's not entirely out of the question. My point is the source you provide still has the possibility of being called into question. You want to definitively put this puppy to bed, you do it with legit sources. Myspace isn't one. Get one of the photo studios that contract her to put it on their website with all the pertinent information - name, references to the myspace account and/or CAG name, in full view of the website or alternatively, you could, God-willing, ask the studio who would be willing to ask her to get on a webcam and just say a 'hello, this URL written on this whiteboard I'm holding is my myspace account' or "I'm kittie from CAG."
 
[quote name='kittie']I guess he doesn't.

And this will hit 500 at a record rate. :p[/QUOTE]

Silly me, thinking that things concerning only two people would be dealt with via a PM. Silly me.
 
[quote name='JSweeney']I really can't think of anything that could be provided here that would prove this and end things once and for all... and if there was, it would likely be something that a reasonable person wouldn't provide to a group of total strangers over the internet.
[/QUOTE]
If Karlie/Jessica sends me a pic of her holding up a sign saying "I've never heard of CAG" like I asked would you believe me then?
 
[quote name='JSweeney']Silly me, thinking that things concerning only two people would be dealt with via a PM. Silly me.[/QUOTE]

Lol... like that's ever happened with me on this board.

Plus, I'm trying to get to 1000 posts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top