[quote name='tauruskatt']
look, i googled, i knew i had heard it from somewhere:
http://boren.nu/archives/2003/11/01/evolutionary-psychology-waist-to-hip-ratio/
"Singh has pointed out that even women who look very different may have similar wait-to-hip ratios. For example, he says that the famous actress Marilyn Monroe and the current skinny model Kate Moss both have the ideal waist-to-hip ratio. Even though they look quite different, their having the ideal waist-to-hip ratio would help explain their appeal, and why they have become stars when other attractive women have not."
the male ideal is apparently 70%, i checked mine on one of the million calculators online and got .71, so i guess i'm good. Also, apparenlty guys whose ring fingers are longer than their index fingers have more testosterone, and, you know...[/QUOTE]
Interesting, to bad they just site people rather than actual articles and journal titles. Still it's nice to know that I can now official blame waist-to-hip ratios when I'm attracted to a women, not her eyes, smile, hair, breast, ass, personality or smell.
Oh and Marilyn was attractive, but Kate Moss I find way to boney like most models.