I didn't pay attention but someone said that all of the champions came out first tonight. I don't know if that's true but its food for thought if it was true.
Regardless, I don't really see why it matters anymore.
Who comes out when regarding TV shows has a lot to do with the format and commercial breaks. If you want people to sit through a commercial break to see the upcoming match, you bait them in with say, John Cena entering first instead of David Otunga. Stuff like that. There is a lot to consider regarding the live audience's reactions and how to keep the home audience hooked. You might even send out the champion first just to keep someone's attention that "Oh, you're going to want to sit right there because a champion is about to fight."
On PPV, I know some fans make a big stink about the champ not entering last, it being a lack of respect thing, etc. etc.
But look at tonight for instance. You had a Paul Heyman promo to cut, and the two entrances. Could Cena have entered first, then Heyman promo, then Punk? Yes. But here is how that plays out. Cena enters to the biggest reaction of the night --> Cena stands around, Heyman then has to make a separate entrance since he's not entering BEFORE Cena then just standing around with his thumb up his ass, so Heyman climbs into the ring and cuts his promo, gets some heat and a mixed reaction thanks to smarks --> Punk enters to his reaction which isn't as big as Cena's. It creates an awkward flow.
Instead, Heyman gets down to the ring, cuts his promo --> His client CM Punk comes out (because why wouldn't his client enter after his promo?), gets the reaction he gets --> Cena comes out and gets an even bigger reaction, and love him or hate him, he was in his "home" town. It was a logical and orderly build up in terms of flow and baiting the crowd's response.
And of ALL the things pro-wrestling does wrong or stupid, I'll just never understand why people lose their shit over champions not entering first. It's been happening for so many years now. It's not a new device WWE invented to ruin wrestling.
If anything, people should be insulted that WWE thinks that a person performing an offensive pinning maneuver on their opponent (who is therefore on defense) can somehow pin themselves and cancel out the offensive pin fall.
That's not even in the international or NCAA rules of amateur wrestling, if my Google searches turned up complete/correct info. The only thing I found for amateur wrestling was West Virginia Boys High School Wrestling Rules that said both men get a fall if the offense participant's shoulders are down too. Yes yes I know we're talking pro wrestling here, which has no real rule book and makes up shit as they go along, but I just wanted to see if there was any basis in "real" wrestling for the finish tonight. So the basis might be WV high school wrestling's rule book.
And tonight wasn't a situation where its ambiguous or both men are on offense and defense simultaneously, like that Punk/Bryan pin/submission finish. You can almost forgive that.
But if you extrapolate the logic of tonight's finish, you're telling me 37 time world champion John Cena can throw a second rope German suplex but can't bridge the pin properly?
ing Alicia Fox knows how to bridge suplex pins properly. And if not that, then you have shitty officiating because the referee couldn't simultaneously look to see if both Punk and Cena's shoulders were pinned down. They didn't even put a camera angle on Cena's other shoulder because I'd bet money it was up. Again, yes I realize we're talking about pro wrestling. You could write off John Cena as "tired" even though he just seconds before no sold falling off the second rope and ran back to hit that German suplex. And yes, even "real life" referees in other sports make mistakes and bad calls so its something that could happen in WWE-land too. Its just a shitty out to keep the status quo via Dusty finish. Cena "won" but Punk stays true to his M.O. of keeping the title by any means necessary, so now there is need to see yet another match between the two of them to determine the better man for the championship.
If they were determined to give us a non-finish, there had to be a more creative finish that could accomplish Cena looking strong and Punk escaping with the title without insulting our intelligence by making up a rule regarding pin falls. Because at the end of the night, Cena didn't win the title because he pinned.... HIMSELF.
Why not have Punk keep trying to lure Cena to the outside so Punk can play dirtier. Punk does this continually and aggravates Cena. Have Cena reach a point of frustration where Cena is dominating Punk on the outside at the end of the match, but neglects the fact the referee has counted them both out. Cena looks strong, Punk escapes with the belt, and you didn't have to make up an obscure rule to pull it off. Now you've established the basis for the fact there will be no more getting away from the ring, and if Punk wants to play hard, it doesn't get any harder than being locked into the HELL IN A CELL. Next Pay Per View sold. It doesn't change the fact that it was a non-finish for a PPV main event people theoretically paid good money for, but if they were determined to go that route, there were other ways to do it.
Who cares who entered first?