[quote name='WV Matsui']I will say it!
We have all lost money on

ing shares in here. It is a permanent price drop. All I did was ask him how much his

ing share was and you had roll in here and act like the GameShare police.
I am not buying it and I will wait for someone who did pay $5.40 to sell there slot. If Crash wants to sell his slot for $7 or $100 that's up to him. All I did is ask a question and you decided to mount your

ing high horse and roll in here like you know everything.
[/QUOTE]
Wow, I'm the bully here?

You need to calm down.
[quote name='WV Matsui']
And in case you didn't notice the site is called cheap ass gamer and we are in a gamesharing forum so we are all cheap.
QFT and leave me alone.
[/QUOTE]
There is nothing wrong with being cheap.
Don't forget, you're the one that posted vague comments asking me "Dude what the hell? " followed by "Dude you still don't get it."
And no, I'm not psychic.
[quote name='WV Matsui']
I guess I will go to best buy and tell them that since the new MSRP on Duke Nukem is $9.99 that they should sell that shit for $59.99! Don't listen to the manufacturer, BB paid for that game they don't have to sell it for $9.99! And guess what, it will sit in the damn shelf just as long as some of these shares with permanent price drops will. ![/QUOTE]
That is a horrible flawed example.
You're talking about a game that no one want (at any price...even free lol)
Lets pretend Duke Nukem is an awesome game and that $9.99 is a good clearance price. If the game is sold out at the clearance price, am I obligated to sell it to you at exactly $9.99? No, I'm not.
Likewise, the 5-slots psn activations are a thing of the past.
Right now, if you set up a new gameshare of ME2+DLC, it is going to cost you $13.50. While the lowest possible price is indeed $5.40, $7 is not a crazy inflated price (I think his cost was $10)
[quote name='WV Matsui']
Ask someone with Infamous 2 who bought it for $12 and now can't sell it for $5![/QUOTE]
Yes, I find that disturbing.
This thread is a ghost town. There is barely any activity here.
But remember, you're the one fixated on the share being current market price divided by five.
I simply stated that the seller should determine a fair price on his own and that $7 is not a bad price.
[quote name='bastiartadi']Yes. The original buyer bought the share and had time to play it. If there were price drops, it is the seller's (the original buyer) responsibility. He or she had taken his or her time with the game and had not sold it immediately. Moreover, they played the game much earlier than his potential buyer. That should incur a premium of some sort. That premium is the absorption of the loss if there were to be a price drop.
I'll throw you your own question, why would others need to absorb the loss?[/QUOTE]
Luckily, most of these PSN prices are stable.
But when there is a price drop in value, the distribution of the loss should be dependent on the market (supply vs demand).
I don't think sellers should incur 100% of the loss by default.