Great show, Shipwreck! We miss Mrs. Ship, but Cheapy and Wombat are almost as good as replacements.
Hey guys,
I was listening to your discussion about EA and Ubisoft charging extra for used buyers to play the whole game, and facepalmed when you concluded that it doesn't affect you. You don't have to get outraged or even care, but I would have expected you of all folks to understand how this will play out. This DOES affect you significantly, even if you only buy your games new, and here's why.
You think that extra $10 (or $20, in the case of SOCOM) is going to come from the cheapskates who buy used games? Of course not. What's going to happen is that buy prices and trade prices are going to drop by exactly $10. When you buy EA Super Hyped Newgame for $60 and discover you hate it for whatever reason, when you bring it to GameStop or trade it on Goozex the next day, you'll be getting $35 instead of $45 (or whatever it would have been).
EA is devaluing your games, and unless you keep all your games forever, this affects you. You (the gamers who can afford to buy games new) should be the ones getting outraged about this. Broke guys like me will just have to keep on buying used, and we'll just have to avoid EA titles from now on unless they're at crazy low clearance.
Which is another thing that's been bugging me: you keep saying that game companies don't benefit from used sales, but that's not really true. When Joe buys a game new for $60 and then sells it to me a month later for $30, what essentially has happened is that Joe and I have each given the company $30. Neither of us could have afforded the whole unsubsidized $60, so if used sales were illegal, that's $60 the game companies would never have seen. So please don't say that used games are the same as piracy, that's hurtful and inconsiderate to those of us who try to support the industry in the small way we are able, rather than resorting to stealing. Thank you!
~Justme8800
PS, Great show, really! I complain because I care.