[quote name='speedracer']I don't think a late/clutch situation against a situation in which a hit is worth exactly 1 win is an apples to apples comparison. Even an AB in which a successful outcome greatly increases the chance to win is not the same as a hit that guarantees a win. Getting a walk in that situation would be looked at as favorably by tOPS+ as actually getting the game winning hit.
BP or Fangraphs needs to find a way to make that stat happen for me. I don't think it's tracked.

[/QUOTE]
There wouldn't be a large enough sample size for that type of situation to mean anything, though. We both know that a large portion of hitting, outside of K, BB, and to a slightly lesser extent HR, is based on luck; so unless a player proves over a significant number of AB that he's better or worse at not getting himself out in a specific situation, it's probably best to regard any potential deviations from career OPS as noise. That's not to say I disagree with your premise of separating one clutch situation from another, though.
Also, a walk would generate an OPS of 1.000; a base hit would produce at least 2.000. For tOPS+ purposes, at least, a hit would be favored over a walk.
How bugged are you that the Dodgers traded Santana? Trading an awesome prospect under the banner of saving money, while signing Manny Ramirez to a trillion dollar deal. Disaster.
On the topic of 1B:
If I were a GM, I'd sign Adrian Gonzalez and laugh at the team who drastically overpays for Prince Fielder. And if I were the Phillies' GM, I would have kept Lee for far less money, and received absolute studs in return for Howard, then packaged those studs for Adrian Gonzalez.
I promise, I'm not in love with Adrian Gonzalez.