PSNOT 2.0 - I kind of want to subscribe to IndieBox.

Status
Not open for further replies.
here's another ambiguous sign
prostitue_1609042c.jpg
Does this mean to look out for prostitutes or that prostitutes should pay attention? :whistle2:k

 
Well, I can't tell you if it's good or not. I can tell you that I like it, but probably not enough to download and listen to more than once. Rap, like pretty much anything else at this point, I tend to gravitate towards alternative takes on the genre. A fairly new rap group I've been enjoying is CLIPPING which combines rap and "noise"
Hey, the song I just listened to on Youtube from them is kinda cool. Have to check them out more later when I have the chance.

 
Therm, I assume you went to college, what did you major in? We know it can't be English or any scientific related discipline since you don't seem to understand the meaning of subjective and objective. I want to guess something like Art History but I can't imagine how you ended up in Nashville if that were the case.
Minored in English. Why do you think I don't understand the difference between subjective and objective? I'm guessing your sarcasm meter is broken. I know you completely misunderstood that Anita post I made yesterday despite me making a number of pro-feminism and pro-Anita posts previously.

 
Minored in English. Why do you think I don't understand the difference between subjective and objective? I'm guessing your sarcasm meter is broken. I know you completely misunderstood that Anita post I made yesterday despite me making a number of pro-feminism and pro-Anita posts previously.
An opinion about what is bad acting can by definition not be objective. I happen to agree it was bad acting in your example, but it is still subjective. You mentioned the sign and how it could be interpreted incorrectly when you and ambulance chancing lawyers would be the only ones who would make that argument.

I admit, my sarcasm meter was likely thrown off by you appearing to hate everything.

I apologize if I did not memorize every post you made in the past that was pro-feminism. I still have no clue what the fuck your post yesterday meant and apparently others didn't as well since I got a few likes mainly by the people I remember being pro-feminism when the topic came up before.

 
Just so we are clear, I am pro-feminist. I am all for a woman's right to choose.

Top, bottom, from behind, whatever she likes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reading Therm's posts is really driving me nuts today.
It's pretty interesting seeing the reactions, I'll be honest. Like with that tow sign. I think it's pretty obvious I was calling out that idiots who park in those places are dumb enough to think the sign is saying the property owner will pay for the tow. Getting your car towed means you didn't meet a certain minimum requirement for intelligence...so why would such a person be expected to read the sign correctly? The property owner not accounting for stupidity by having the sign say "at vehicle owner's expense" is also at issue.

I'm not sure if people are trolling in response to me pointing that out or if they legitimately are in need of yellow text and other clear signs to call out sarcasm and the like.

 
I am too lazy to post the gif. Vig? But that one went over your head.
I actually thought you were making an obscure joke about the two people who critique things heavily being the same major and I was trying to run with it for you. I can see how that would be as horribly misunderstood as apparently all of Therm's posts are.

 
And the only Hulk I wanna hear about coming to any console is a port or direct sequel to Incredible Hulk: Ultimate Destruction. Anything else can go to hell.
I played Ultimate Destruction sort of recently. It hasn't aged well at all. I was hyped to play it and ending up not even finishing it (which I rarely do these days once I start something) [well at least story wise not 100%].

Are you going to try for the plat in Infamous 2? If so, I posted a few tips for it a while back. Nothing special, but will help.
I don't know yet as I have a lot of other games to get to but if I do I'll look up those tips...thanks.

More to the point on Flash though: If you're watching a super-hero tv show on CW for world-class plot and writing, of course you're going to be disappointed.
That's like the CAGcast...they would go on about how bad the current Transformers movies are...they talk about the acting and dialogue. It's like are you really watching for anything else other than Transformers, transforming, and explosions?

Insta-buy for jkam.
I already played MGS4 so I won't be picking it up.

I guess I'm going to be buying RE Revelations 2 at Retail as well with the extra content and $32 with GCU. Hopefully they throw in a $10 cert as well :)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is bad acting that no one could possible say was good acting. Like Tommy Wiseau. That stuff can objectively be called bad. But then there is acting which some think is good and others think is bad. That stuff is subjective. So I say it's both objective and subjective. Take that!

 
I actually thought you were making an obscure joke about the two people who critique things heavily being the same major and I was trying to run with it for you. I can see how that would be as horribly misunderstood as apparently all of Therm's posts are.
Yes, I was making that obscure joke. I kind of knew you got it too, but went with it since I liked my comeback. I am easily amused today. Had a bad day yesterday with work and today is much better.

 
. I still have no clue what the fuck your post yesterday meant and apparently others didn't as well since I got a few likes mainly by the people I remember being pro-feminism when the topic came up before.
The dialogue stated that the video would be taken seriously because it was by men and so could not be self-serving. I was pointing out that anybody who disagreed with the video and watched the credits would see a woman's name (particularly Anita's) and write the video off immediately because of it. "Not self-serving? Bullshit!"

Edit: Or "This is garbage!" to tie the video in more specifically.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess I'm going to be buying RE Revelations 2 at Retail as well with the extra content and $32 with GCU. Hopefully they throw in a $10 cert as well :)
IIRC, Best Buy has never given certificates for anything that cost less than $59.99, so you're very likely out of luck there. A $10 gift card like Shadow Warrior had would be pretty sweet, though.

 
There is bad acting that no one could possible say was good acting. Like Tommy Wiseau. That stuff can objectively be called bad. But then there is acting which some think is good and others think is bad. That stuff is subjective. So I say it's both objective and subjective. Take that!
But The Room is so bad it's good

 
Hey Vig, how are those ace attorney games? I never played any of them, but I see people mention them a lot
OHMYGOSH SO GOOOOOOD

Seriously, Ace Attorney is among my most favorite series because the games are so unique. If you don't like reading lots of text, though, you may not get as much enjoyment out of them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's pretty interesting seeing the reactions, I'll be honest. Like with that tow sign. I think it's pretty obvious I was calling out that idiots who park in those places are dumb enough to think the sign is saying the property owner will pay for the tow. Getting your car towed means you didn't meet a certain minimum requirement for intelligence...so why would such a person be expected to read the sign correctly? The property owner not accounting for stupidity by having the sign say "at vehicle owner's expense" is also at issue.

I'm not sure if people are trolling in response to me pointing that out or if they legitimately are in need of yellow text and other clear signs to call out sarcasm and the like.
No, I think it's pretty obvious that you're just trying to get on people's nerves sometimes with things like the parking sign. I'm talking about posts where you basically say "when you people like bad things, is it because you just ignore how bad it is or because you are too dumb to understand how bad it is? BTW, I can't ignore how bad bad things are."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
like the CAGcast...they would go on about how bad the current Transformers movies are...they talk about the acting and dialogue. It's like are you really watching for anything else other than Transformers, transforming, and explosions?
In no way, shape or form would I ever defend the CAGcast, but I was not watching it to see the Transformers blow shit up. I was watching it because I took my kids to see it. It was god awful. One of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. Bad acting, bad story, bad everything.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lots of text doesn't bother me one bit. Loved the 999 games
Then I highly, highly recommend the Ace Attorney series. If I weren't playing the heck out of Danganronpa 2 during my portable-gaming time, I'd be doing the same for Dual Destinies. It's unfortunate that DD is digital-only and rarely goes on sale (it was $17.99 on the eShop a couple of months ago and $14.99 during BF weekend, I think), though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In no way, shape or form would I ever defend the CAGcast, but I was not watching it to see the Transformers blow shit up. I was watching it because I took my kids to see it. It was god awful. One of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. Bad acting, bad story, bad everything.
But did your kids want to watch it to see Transformers blow sh*t up?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, I think it's pretty obvious that you're just trying to get on people's nerves sometimes with things like the parking sign. I'm talking about posts where you basically say "when you people like bad things, is it because you just ignore how bad it is or because you are too dumb to understand how bad it is? BTW, I can't ignore bad bad things are."
If you read it this way, then you ignored the context of my post. I compared it very clearly to how some people cannot see HD vs SD or hear lossy vs lossless (I can't hear lossy vs lossless, btw.) Unless you're going to argue that not being able to discern between those things makes you dumb, then I'm not sure how you could equate my statement to saying people who don't notice characterization or plot problems are dumb.

 
The dialogue stated that the video would be taken seriously because it was by men and so could not be self-serving. I was pointing out that anybody who disagreed with the video and watched the credits would see a woman's name (particularly Anita's) and write the video off immediately because of it. "Not self-serving? Bullshit!"

Edit: Or "This is garbage!" to tie the video in more specifically.
I am now even more glad that I did not understand what you meant with that post. I seriously doubt anyone did.

 
If you read it this way, then you ignored the context of my post. I compared it very clearly to how some people cannot see HD vs SD or hear lossy vs lossless (I can't hear lossy vs lossless, btw.) Unless you're going to argue that not being able to discern between those things makes you dumb, then I'm not sure how you could equate my statement to saying people who don't notice characterization or plot problems are dumb.
To be honest Therm I kinda took it the same way Munky did, whether you meant it that way or not.

 
But did your kids want to watch it to see Transformers blow sh*t up?
Of course they did, and they loved it. I should also note that it also depicts women terribly, so I regretted taking them to see it for that reason. I guess that would make it right up some of your (not necessarily your) alleys, though….

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course they did, and they loved it. I should also note that it also depicts women terribly, so I regretted taking them to see it for that reason. I guess that would make it right up some of your (not necessarily your) alleys, though….
Ugh, no, I hated it, too, and I watched it for free.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To be honest Therm I kinda took it the same way Munky did, whether you meant it that way or not.
Interesting. I just reread it and I still can't see how anybody could come to that conclusion from what I said unless they just glossed over it and made assumptions about the content.

Here's the post. Look over it again and point out which part lead you to that conclusion:

https://www.cheapassgamer.com/topic/339271-psnot-20-now-even-snottier-remember-to-like-the-op-for-re-confirmation-that-we-are-popular/page-27#entry12295802

 
Interesting. I just reread it and I still can't see how anybody could come to that conclusion from what I said unless they just glossed over it and made assumptions about the content.

Here's the post. Look over it again and point out which part lead you to that conclusion:

https://www.cheapassgamer.com/topic/339271-psnot-20-now-even-snottier-remember-to-like-the-op-for-re-confirmation-that-we-are-popular/page-27#entry12295802
Can't we just move on from this? Please?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top