[quote name='IronMan2020']ok lets see if i can keep this short...
doc ock was the first vilian spidey ever fought. in one of thier battles the father of peters girlfriend dies. later the green goblin kidnaps gwen stacy and in attempting to save her from a fall caused by the goblin, spidey accidentally kills her.
this story line is ESSENTIAL to the life of peter parker and the carreer of spiderman.
this should have been the first one and a half movies. if you attempt to tell the story, the RIGHT story of spiderman, that is how you tell it.
instead, they've mixed it all up. i dont care how they explain the origin of the symbiote, as long as that origin does not include gwen and her father.
the second movie should have been the first. it had to be.
he is a super-hero. he killed his lover. power. responsbility.
uncle ben is only a small part of the guilt peter feels. the man who raised him, his girlfriends dad, his best friends dad, his girlfriend. they all die on his watch. these people all have to be explored. but only in the right order.
if the funeral at the end of the first movie was for gwen, after you saw peter snap her neck, would have made people cry. just the iconic visual and the >snap< would've made people jump in their seats.
[/QUOTE]
I can see what you are saying. I really agree to an extent, but you have to understand that it took 8 years in the comics for the whole Gwen Stacy story to develop. Spider-man killing (even by accident) his girlfriend would not have been a good idea for audience members that have no clue about the comics at least in the first movie.. It would be confusing and even turn off some people from seeing the movie.
Now, in the third movie is anything goes...because people that are going to see it are the ones that have seen the first two and now have a deeper understanding of the Spider-man character. So if he does end up accidently killing Gwen in the movie, do to Venom or Sandman, then the impact will be greater.
I have been reading X-men for over 20 years and I thought that Synger really captured the idea of what the X-men really are in his first two films. I could be picky and bitch that it wasn't the original team or their costumes were not the comic book costumes, or Stryker was really a crazy ass preacher in the comics, but I think that they threw enough in there for the comic fans as well. Like Wolverine saying bub or mentioning the black and yellow outfits.
Now Marvels would be amazing to see in the big screen. But I think it would be safer released as straight to DVD. I don't think audiences are ready for something like that. That would clash every classic super-hero from the silver age together in one screen. Even if Kurt Busiek was a consultant on the film. You never know what will bomb at the box office. These are the same people that let V for Vendetta (which I thought was superior to it's comic counterpart) bomb and let Jackass part 2 be the number one movie in America. They are in talks over a JLA movie and to be honest I think that will bomb if it ever gets made. Great for us comic fans, but unfortunately we make up a small fraction of the cinema audience.
I think you hit the nail on the head with Sin City though, that was the perfect comic book movie. It was like Rodriguez said F uck storyboards! Get me the comics! And it worked for those movies. Glad to hear you like Peter David so much. It would be great to have him write the next Hulk movie. In our second interview with him, we kind of talk about Holywood writers and comics. You can listen to it here:
http://aboutheroes.com/content/2007/02/about_heroes_episode_45.php