[quote name='007']Yeah, but as I said... even if that happened, I'm hugely skeptical. I think, as a brand, TNA is dead in the water. Heyman can't save 'TNA', his best shot would literally be to take TNA's assets and make it a brand-new company... and, at that point, it'd likely be easier to just start a new company. Again, Heyman is not the messiah, and TNA is way more

ed than anyone wants to admit. [/QUOTE]
I don't think TNA is dead in the water, it's just extremely stagnate. The fact that they have SpikeTV's support is enough reason to try and save them instead of starting anew.
To save TNA would be fairly simple.
1) They need to trim the fat. Get rid of most of the older guys and stop emphasizing the ones left, over new/TNA talent. Heyman already did this once with Funk.
2) They need to build new stars out of what they have. This one is the one Heyman excels at. He's not the messiah but he is, hands down, the best in the industry when it comes to building new stars. Hardcore Justice showed how much he turned lemons (PJ Polaco, F.B.I, Kid Kash, Spike Dudley) into lemonade with ECW. With WWECW, he turned Big Show from a novelty act into a legitimate threat.
3) They need to move forward and innovate. Most of the older guys, including Heyman, have been talking about stealing things back from MMA. That would be a step in the right direction instead of this nostalgia trip TNA has been on with bring old guys in and repackaging the people who should be the face of their company with old guy gimmicks (AJ Styles as Ric Flair, Abyss as Hogan, etc) which makes the whole company look bush league.
4) They need to excel in places that the WWE don't. X-Division, Knockouts, they were already moving in the right direction before Hogan and Bischoff showed up.
5) They need a good, competent booker that can listen to the fans when necessary and book long term. There is no quick fix for TNA.
[quote name='007']Personally, I think Heyman's demands were for the same reason RVD demanded $10,000 per appearance after his dates... they don't really want to do it, but if someone was crazy enough to agree to the ridiculous terms, they'd be there. Either way, Heyman wins.[/QUOTE]
I really don't think so. He wanted a Dana White style deal and the WWE already offered him amazing money to run their development promotion (OVW at the time?) which he turned down awhile ago.
Seems like he doesn't want to get caught up in politics and wants to get something out of turning around the company.