[quote name='CaseyRyback']So you are criticizing reviewers because you think they have not seen movies that you haven't seen? That makes no sense.
Also the film has made like 2 billion dollars and is the biggest domestic grosser of all time (not adjusted for inflation). How is this not going to be hailed as the future? It has completely changed the way theaters are eyeing their business. They just had a movie that sustained premium grosses for almost four months solid on this movie. Theaters are going to be throwing up 3D displays like crazy and putting a lot of effort into marketing the 3D experience. As the gap closes between theatrical release and DVD release theaters are going to look at movies like Avatar and see that it is the type of movie that has to be seen in the theaters.[/QUOTE]
I don't care about the movie and the ridiculous gross and so forth. The same goes for
Titanic and the same yuppie mother

ers that saw that damn atrocity 10+ times.
I was just upset about people gushing over it thinking that all of a sudden there is this new fangled technology that is going change everyone's lives. As you said everyone and their grandmother is changing their approach (because they are greedy little

wads and they think they will pull the same gross if they take their shitty movie and turn it to 3D).
Also, you can count me out when you say that
The Hurt Locker and
Dancing with Smurfs have basically the same storyline, and to the same extent
District 9.

that...
(Sorry films can rub me the wrong way)