What changes to CAG would you like to see in 2007?

funny that people mention changes to the cag front page. i hardly ever visit that page any more since i just go straight to the forums. haha.

is there anyway we could get a trading system up like gametz?
 
[quote name='CheapyD']Maybe that is something I will keep in mind for next time.
[/QUOTE]

Here's a thought... I wonder if there is a way to make it so that the coupon ONLY works when you go through the CAG affiliate? This way, if word travels around the coupon (and it will) at least CAG is making some money off of it.

I don't know if such a thing is possible, but I know Overstock had done it before, where coupons would only work if you went through an affiliate link.

I'm curious to see if Play-Asia sees a spike in sales due to the special coupon.
 
If I were to redesign the frontpage, just for fun (CheapyD proably already has one in progress) would the color scheme need to stay at green? What about black/blue?
 
[quote name='Riyonuk']If I were to redesign the frontpage, just for fun (CheapyD proably already has one in progress) would the color scheme need to stay at green? What about black/blue?[/quote]

That sounds good.
 
[quote name='Riyonuk']If I were to redesign the frontpage, just for fun (CheapyD proably already has one in progress) would the color scheme need to stay at green? What about black/blue?[/QUOTE]
I think its green and gold because of green cash and gold, well gold.
 
Green is for the money and gold is for the honeys!

pimp.jpg
 
[quote name='Riyonuk']If I were to redesign the frontpage, just for fun (CheapyD proably already has one in progress) would the color scheme need to stay at green? What about black/blue?[/QUOTE]
Green and gold has always been CAG's identity, not black and blue.
 
[quote name='Riyonuk']I dont even see much gold though, I see tons of blue and green and even some black. Just links are gold.[/quote]

The old phpbb forum was all Green/Gold/Black by default. There was an option for Orange/Green/Black. When we switched to vBulletin, he decided to use a stock theme, which happened to kinda match CAG's colors. I miss the Green.
 
[quote name='Riyonuk']I dont even see much gold though, I see tons of blue and green and even some black. Just links are gold.[/QUOTE]
Where are you seeing tons of blue?
 
[quote name='MillerTime2523']Cheapy, If you decide to add a video game database (Which would be kickass) How about you run some contests, and people could gain points for adding submissions to the database. Then after.. X amount of time, the most points wins whatever prize.

This would probably encourage people to add stuff to the databse quickly - Mods could approve or disapprove the submissions (based on the criteria used, such as release dates.. box art, etc.)[/quote]What sort of game database are you talking about? Reviews? Previews? ABC lists?

One thing which would have to be encouraged would be quality over quantity because you don't want a ton of worthless content taking up server space and bandwidth.

[quote name='Roufuss']This way, if word travels around the coupon (and it will) at least CAG is making some money off of it.[/quote] You say that like its a publicly traded company and we're share holders. If that were the case, I might be interested. I come here for good deals. But I have no interest in lining someone elses' pockets.


And the palatte is shades of grey.
 
[quote name='guinaevere']
You say that like its a publicly traded company and we're share holders. If that were the case, I might be interested. I come here for good deals. But I have no interest in lining someone elses' pockets.
[/QUOTE]

When Cheapy provides us all with a coupon for $5 off at a site where deals are very few and far between, it is a huge service, and it is the LEAST anyone can do to use the CAG affiliate link to provide some money back to the site.

Without CAG, we wouldn't even have a $5 off coupon, and I wouldn't have saved $20 - $25 at Play-Asia on multiple orders. Without the affiliate links, CAG dies, and I'd also like to get another coupon down the line.

It would be a very asshole move, imo, to take the coupon that CAG brought to us and not use the affiliate links - that's taking and not giving back. I come here for good deals too, and this $5 off coupon at Play-Asia is probably one of the best deals I've seen in the last two years, much better than $4.99 random shit clearance games at some retailer. Since I can't just send Cheapy some money through Paypal, using the affiliate links is MY way of saying "Thanks, this is awesome!"

You almost make it sound like Cheapy is just using the affiliate links to make himself rich - I'm sure this site, these days, is costing a fortune to maintain and keep up.

I've knocked on the site a ton, I will admit it, but what he did here was a very awesome gesture that I feel a lot of people are taking for granted. Or maybe they just don't realize how awesome a deal $5 off $30 is. Sadly, I've seen more people COMPLAIN about the coupon and it's application more than actually use it. But like I said earlier, people think $5 off isn't a lot, but in the land of imports when sales NEVER happen except for on Play-Asia, it's awesome.

I feel as though CAG gave something back, just like the old days, and if people really did come here for the deals there sure is a lot of bitching about a lot of things that *aren't* deals. I'm guilty of it too, but like I said, CAG gave back, so I don't really feel my complaints are valid anymore - since I come here for deals and Cheapy dropped the best deal in the last few years into my lap.

I didn't mean to rent so much but I'm saying that no matter what Cheapy does to please the community, people are always going to be bashing on him and railing on him. My major complaint was that CAG wasn't like the old days with exclusive retailer stuff, and well, that one got fixed when I brought it up. It's hypocritical of me, yea, because I used to be pretty against the direction CAG was going in, but I've been proven wrong and shown that CAG will *always* be about the deals and Cheapy is still doing what he can to make sure CAG gives back in deal related ways.

But for some people, I guess that's not good enough.
 
[quote name='guinaevere']What sort of game database are you talking about? Reviews? Previews? ABC lists? [/quote]
For collections, such as IGN or Gamespot.
 
[quote name='Roufuss']When Cheapy provides us all with a coupon for $5 off at a site where deals are very few and far between, it is a huge service, and it is the LEAST anyone can do to use the CAG affiliate link to provide some money back to the site.

Without CAG, we wouldn't even have a $5 off coupon, and I wouldn't have saved $20 - $25 at Play-Asia on multiple orders. Without the affiliate links, CAG dies, and I'd also like to get another coupon down the line.

It would be a very asshole move, imo, to take the coupon that CAG brought to us and not use the affiliate links - that's taking and not giving back. I come here for good deals too, and this $5 off coupon at Play-Asia is probably one of the best deals I've seen in the last two years, much better than $4.99 random shit clearance games at some retailer. Since I can't just send Cheapy some money through Paypal, using the affiliate links is MY way of saying "Thanks, this is awesome!"

You almost make it sound like Cheapy is just using the affiliate links to make himself rich - I'm sure this site, these days, is costing a fortune to maintain and keep up.

I've knocked on the site a ton, I will admit it, but what he did here was a very awesome gesture that I feel a lot of people are taking for granted. Or maybe they just don't realize how awesome a deal $5 off $30 is. Sadly, I've seen more people COMPLAIN about the coupon and it's application more than actually use it. But like I said earlier, people think $5 off isn't a lot, but in the land of imports when sales NEVER happen except for on Play-Asia, it's awesome.

I feel as though CAG gave something back, just like the old days, and if people really did come here for the deals there sure is a lot of bitching about a lot of things that *aren't* deals. I'm guilty of it too, but like I said, CAG gave back, so I don't really feel my complaints are valid anymore - since I come here for deals and Cheapy dropped the best deal in the last few years into my lap.

I didn't mean to rent so much but I'm saying that no matter what Cheapy does to please the community, people are always going to be bashing on him and railing on him. My major complaint was that CAG wasn't like the old days with exclusive retailer stuff, and well, that one got fixed when I brought it up. It's hypocritical of me, yea, because I used to be pretty against the direction CAG was going in, but I've been proven wrong and shown that CAG will *always* be about the deals and Cheapy is still doing what he can to make sure CAG gives back in deal related ways.

But for some people, I guess that's not good enough.[/QUOTE]

I know you're talking about me. I do want to see affiliate links used, to be the only way you can get in on the deal. I doubt Cheapy is getting kickbacks on the coupon by itself, and I'm sure they meant for the coupon to be used by us. Putting the code itself on the front page bypasses all of this. I'm not saying we shouldn't advertise the fact we're getting a deal, but the way it's being done is incorrect.

'Hey, sign up for our free service (that we get money for having more members and page views for) to get a sweet exclusive code that members can use to save cash.

Oh BTW, you don't actually have to do all that, here's the code anyways.'

See what I mean? I'm not bashing Cheapy or CAG at all, I'm trying to point out an error that was made and not profiting on it to it's fullest.

If you think I didn't make those comments in the best interest of our community, you (and Cheapy) are mistaken. I'm all for affiliate links as opposed to coupon codes (that any spambot can pick up on and distribute all over the net).

I doubt people at PA are looking at SD and FW and seeing the code, but to advertise it as exclusive and make it available to people without at least making them register is short-sided. That's all I'm trying to say.
 
[quote name='CocheseUGA']I know you're talking about me. I do want to see affiliate links used, to be the only way you can get in on the deal. I doubt Cheapy is getting kickbacks on the coupon by itself, and I'm sure they meant for the coupon to be used by us. Putting the code itself on the front page bypasses all of this. I'm not saying we shouldn't advertise the fact we're getting a deal, but the way it's being done is incorrect.

'Hey, sign up for our free service (that we get money for having more members and page views for) to get a sweet exclusive code that members can use to save cash.

Oh BTW, you don't actually have to do all that, here's the code anyways.'

See what I mean? I'm not bashing Cheapy or CAG at all, I'm trying to point out an error that was made and not profiting on it to it's fullest.

If you think I didn't make those comments in the best interest of our community, you (and Cheapy) are mistaken. I'm all for affiliate links as opposed to coupon codes (that any spambot can pick up on and distribute all over the net).

I doubt people at PA are looking at SD and FW and seeing the code, but to advertise it as exclusive and make it available to people without at least making them register is short-sided. That's all I'm trying to say.[/QUOTE]

Nah, it's not just you... I've seen other people complaining as well about the coupon itself. Well, it is a little bit you, but there are no hard feelings or anything ;) I actually thought about your idea and that's how I got the idea to make the coupon ONLY work through an affiliate link, similar to how certain Overstock coupons only work if you use a certain affiliate link. This way, yea, advertise it through the front page, spread it everywhere, but they are still having to go through CAG to get to it.

Kind of like how Strikebang made people sign up, post three posts and a thread, for a $10 off coupon. The only problem is, then you're getting a lot of people who just sign up, make some BS posts, and never come back. I got my $10 off coupon at SB, I know a lot of other people who did, and I never have any intention of going back, and I don't think the people I know do either.

Play-Asia will see a surge in sales because of the coupon, and they are still making a profit, so I don't think they mind how the coupon gets around.

I know Cheapy isn't getting kickbacks on the coupon itself, but I'm saying he SHOULD be getting kickbacks through the affiliate link since he pulled the strings to get us the coupon in the first place.

I'm just saying whether you make people register or not the coupon will spread it's way out there, so I don't know, guess it just seems tedious to make people jump through one more hoop. And the name is out there anyways, so if people are interested they will check out the site.

It's just a combination of everything I guess... we finally get an awesome "exclusive" deal and many people (not just you) get so negative on it. This is something I've wanted for awhile now (I did make a thread with this idea in Deal Discussions, but it got buried and no one replied) and I just don't want the general negativity to kill any sort of future deal, because I'd love for this to come back or to have a $10 off $60.
 
[quote name='Roufuss']Nah, it's not just you... I've seen other people complaining as well about the coupon itself. Well, it is a little bit you, but there are no hard feelings or anything ;) I actually thought about your idea and that's how I got the idea to make the coupon ONLY work through an affiliate link, similar to how certain Overstock coupons only work if you use a certain affiliate link. This way, yea, advertise it through the front page, spread it everywhere, but they are still having to go through CAG to get to it.

Kind of like how Strikebang made people sign up, post three posts and a thread, for a $10 off coupon. The only problem is, then you're getting a lot of people who just sign up, make some BS posts, and never come back. I got my $10 off coupon at SB, I know a lot of other people who did, and I never have any intention of going back, and I don't think the people I know do either.

Play-Asia will see a surge in sales because of the coupon, and they are still making a profit, so I don't think they mind how the coupon gets around.

I know Cheapy isn't getting kickbacks on the coupon itself, but I'm saying he SHOULD be getting kickbacks through the affiliate link since he pulled the strings to get us the coupon in the first place.

I'm just saying whether you make people register or not the coupon will spread it's way out there, so I don't know, guess it just seems tedious to make people jump through one more hoop. And the name is out there anyways, so if people are interested they will check out the site.

It's just a combination of everything I guess... we finally get an awesome "exclusive" deal and many people (not just you) get so negative on it. This is something I've wanted for awhile now (I did make a thread with this idea in Deal Discussions, but it got buried and no one replied) and I just don't want the general negativity to kill any sort of future deal, because I'd love for this to come back or to have a $10 off $60.[/QUOTE]

I'm with you there. I think affiliate links would allow for more deals in the future, and truly exclusive ones. A coupon code is searchable across the entire internet. Affiliate links...well, concrete proof this website is driving sales, and a defineable amount. That could lead to better deals for us.

Hey, CAG got us a 10% sales bump this month. Let's give them another deal.

Something like that. I think PA is smart enough to realize this coupon is getting around faster than potential fathers for Anna Nicole Smith's daughter. You make people use links, that's proof someone is helping you, and not providing others with FW bucks or whatnot.
 
[quote name='Roufuss']You almost make it sound like Cheapy is just using the affiliate links to make himself rich[/quote]I'm a capitalist, Roo. I've nothing against people making money.

[quote name='MillerTime2523']For collections, such as IGN or Gamespot.[/quote]OH! Gotchya.

Personally I think that'd be a waste of CAGs resources. At the sites I've seen them offered, those game/dvd/comic/whatever lists don't actually produce anything worthwhile. I'm sure some folks enjoy seeing their list and other peoples lists, but that's about it. A fun bragging right if you're into bragging (though what's to stop someone from saying they have every game ever made, it's the internetz I can make any claim and who are you to disprove me?).

I don't recall reading a mission statement here, but CAG is about the deals. Cheapy's been good enough to give us server space to have discussions about anything and everything (and in return that gives him traffic which goes towards advertising sales, so that helps pay for hosting those discussions). A basic listing format doesn't take a ton of resources, but it does a finate amount and I don't know that it truly brings anything beneficial to the site.

Edit: Forgot to respond to this earlier...
[quote name='Roufuss']I didn't mean to rent so much but I'm saying that no matter what [/quote]
Don't apologize, Roufuss.

Differing opinions and approaches to issues makes things far more interesting than if we all agreed all the time. I wubs ya, you're a good guy and my friendship isn't dependant upon our agreeing. If anything, I'd rather have friends who can tell me straight up when they disagree with me; you have a different view than I have for some reason, if you didn't share that with me and you're right and I'm wrong, I'd be missing an opportunity to learn, correct myself, and grow.
 
[quote name='craven_fiend']I'd like to echo the requests for a seperate forum for Movies, TV, DVDs, and audio/video tech forum.[/QUOTE]
There's enough people around here who have a hard time posting in the correct forum as it is. Making the forums even more specialized wouldn't help things, IMHO.
 
[quote name='WhipSmartBanky']There's enough people around here who have a hard time posting in the correct forum as it is. Making the forums even more specialized wouldn't help things, IMHO.[/quote]

So TRU has Game Boy Micro for $35, right?

Oops...
 
Getting back to new ideas, I have one which I've been kicking around for a while. I ran it by a mod last evening to see if there were any obvious reasons for which this wouldn't work. I truly think this is viable and would be of benefit to a number of us.



Simply put, it would be helpful to have Wiki Pages added for store specific clearances. ie Kmart, TRU, CC, GameRush, GameCrazy and Sears and possibly Target.

Some stores have less of a need, but some Clearance threads get to be crazy long and its incumbent upon the OP to keep the Origial Post updated as new markdowns happen and/or new markdowns are discovered. When the OP is not able to keep up with this, cags have to wade through pages of posts searching for relevent markdown posts. Creating a Store Clearance Section in the Wiki would alleviate this problem, as any wiki editor could help out and update as new markdowns are reported. The basic requirement of creating a Clearance thread would be to add a notation as to current markdowns and a very visible link to the corresponding Wiki page.

Obviously some stores such as Target and Kmart have a YMMV issue to factor in, but this would be noted at the top of each page, just as it's noted repeatedly throughout the clearance threads. I know Target salvages their clearance items after a certain point, so that would be noted as well.

The benefit to this would be keeping all store clearance prices in one organized location, streamlining things a bit and letting some of the pressure off of OPs who wind up burdoned for months with keeping on top of updates.
 
[quote name='guinaevere']Getting back to new ideas, I have one which I've been kicking around for a while. I ran it by a mod last evening to see if there were any obvious reasons for which this wouldn't work. I truly think this is viable and would be of benefit to a number of us.



Simply put, it would be helpful to have Wiki Pages added for store specific clearances. ie Kmart, TRU, CC, GameRush, GameCrazy and Sears and possibly Target.

Some stores have less of a need, but some Clearance threads get to be crazy long and its incumbent upon the OP to keep the Origial Post updated as new markdowns happen and/or new markdowns are discovered. When the OP is not able to keep up with this, cags have to wade through pages of posts searching for relevent markdown posts. Creating a Store Clearance Section in the Wiki would alleviate this problem, as any wiki editor could help out and update as new markdowns are reported. The basic requirement of creating a Clearance thread would be to add a notation as to current markdowns and a very visible link to the corresponding Wiki page.

Obviously some stores such as Target and Kmart have a YMMV issue to factor in, but this would be noted at the top of each page, just as it's noted repeatedly throughout the clearance threads. I know Target salvages their clearance items after a certain point, so that would be noted as well.

The benefit to this would be keeping all store clearance prices in one organized location, streamlining things a bit and letting some of the pressure off of OPs who wind up burdoned for months with keeping on top of updates.[/QUOTE]

If the OP can't keep up, then they have no business making the thread in the first place. If they want the glory, then do the work.
 
[quote name='CocheseUGA']If the OP can't keep up, then they have no business making the thread in the first place. If they want the glory, then do the work.[/QUOTE]

Well, the other thing is, sometimes a noob who checks the site once the week will break the news... in this situation, it should also fall on the mods to update the sales (which they do, for the big ones).
 
[quote name='Roufuss']Well, the other thing is, sometimes a noob who checks the site once the week will break the news... in this situation, it should also fall on the mods to update the sales (which they do, for the big ones).[/QUOTE]

I was more referring to the people who want to be the 'man' and start the newest Kmart, Target, etc clearance thread. If you can't be assed to keep up with a thread, then don't start it. That's why we get twenty threads about clearance items because people 'thought it would get lost' in the official thread. It's just a waste.
 
I brought this up a long time ago but I would like to see a movie section to discuss movies, tv shows and stuff like that. We have a dvd deals thread so why not a separate thread to talk about them instead of jamming it all in the Off-Topic section?
 
[quote name='CocheseUGA']I was more referring to the people who want to be the 'man' and start the newest Kmart, Target, etc clearance thread. If you can't be assed to keep up with a thread, then don't start it. That's why we get twenty threads about clearance items because people 'thought it would get lost' in the official thread. It's just a waste.[/QUOTE]

Oh, yea, my bad ;)
 
[quote name='CocheseUGA']If the OP can't keep up, then they have no business making the thread in the first place. If they want the glory, then do the work.[/quote]True, but that won't stop it from happening.

And you also don't take into account when a person takes a break from cag, be it vacation, work, school, et cetera. (As an example, 66 and I were discussing who would keep the penny guides updated if/when floormat needs a vacation or just isn't able to make it every dang day.) No one here is online at every moment , nor should they be.


What I propose is an easy solution to allowing those in the community who are interested in X-Topic monitor and be an active part of that specific issue.


Isn't that the basic reason we have the trade-in values in the wiki? A good number of people wish to know trade in values for any number of reasons, and a good number of people do trade-ins so they are able to supply that information to others in this community. How much easier it is to allow editors update that information than keep that itemized account ongoing in thread form only.

But I am not suggesting ending clearance threads; they keep the finds fresh and on peoples' minds. But having the prices mirrored in the wiki would keep things structured and any editor could update the list at any time.

It's also a way to keep clearance prices from past markdowns visable to those who might otherwise not have been here for those reductions. For a personal example I remembered from a CC clearance a few years back that LaPucelle Tactics had been drastically marked down. When I stumbled upon it at a CC in Alabama nine months later, I would have walked right past it seeing its sticker of 29.99. But knowing it had been clearanced, I picked it up and bought it for 1.96.
 
One thing that came to mind was that having a regular staff writers with weekly or bi weekly articles on whatever (news, deals, ways of handling sales, etc.). It would always keep the front page fresh as well as pull more people in. The only thing I say to leave out are reviews... the internet has too many already.
 
[quote name='guinaevere']Personally I think that'd be a waste of CAGs resources. At the sites I've seen them offered, those game/dvd/comic/whatever lists don't actually produce anything worthwhile.[/quote]
Well.. I think that it could be the CAG way of doing it, instead of the IGN or Gamespot way of doing it.

IGN
DS - Madden NFL 2006
360 - Crackdown

CAG
DS - Madden NFL 2006 - $8.96; 2006 Circuit City Summer Sale
360 - Crackdown - $42.95 Shipped; Play-asia.com w/ code CHEAPASS

Something of that nature, keeping track of what games you bought for what price at what store / sale. idk, its just a personal opinion and something i'd like to see done here on CAG.
 
Can we have people in the deals thread post actual deals?

I've seen this lately:
Hey, saw some games on clearance at Best Buy. Don't remember what they are or how much they were. Just a heads up
Click to expand...
and today's 'Here's an ad: link' thread. People are posting more and more on the main page just to start threads.
 
[quote name='MillerTime2523']Well.. I think that it could be the CAG way of doing it, instead of the IGN or Gamespot way of doing it.

IGN
DS - Madden NFL 2006
360 - Crackdown

CAG
DS - Madden NFL 2006 - $8.96; 2006 Circuit City Summer Sale
360 - Crackdown - $42.95 Shipped; Play-asia.com w/ code CHEAPASS

Something of that nature, keeping track of what games you bought for what price at what store / sale. idk, its just a personal opinion and something i'd like to see done here on CAG.[/quote]
Just do that on IGN. That's what I do and it's easy to do.
 
[quote name='Roufuss']When Cheapy provides us all with a coupon for $5 off at a site where deals are very few and far between, it is a huge service, and it is the LEAST anyone can do to use the CAG affiliate link to provide some money back to the site.

True.

Without the affiliate links, CAG dies.

False.

It would be a very asshole move, imo, to take the coupon that CAG brought to us and not use the affiliate links - that's taking and not giving back.

True.

I come here for good deals too, and this $5 off coupon at Play-Asia is probably one of the best deals I've seen in the last two years, much better than $4.99 random shit clearance games at some retailer.

False.

Since I can't just send Cheapy some money through Paypal.

False.

I'm sure this site, these days, is costing a fortune to maintain and keep up.

False.


I didn't mean to rent so much but I'm saying that no matter what Cheapy does to please the community, people are always going to be bashing on him and railing on him.

True.

I've been proven wrong and shown that CAG will *always* be about the deals and Cheapy is still doing what he can to make sure CAG gives back in deal related ways.

True.

But for some people, I guess that's not good enough.

True.[/quote]
Just dropped some notes in there on a previous post.
 
We're more than halfway through the year, so how do you guys think CAG is doing? Is there anything specific that you'd like to see happen before the year is over?

Just interested to see if anybody has any mid-2007 feedback!
 
[quote name='evilmax17']We're more than halfway through the year, so how do you guys think CAG is doing? Is there anything specific that you'd like to see happen before the year is over?

Just interested to see if anybody has any mid-2007 feedback![/quote]

Well we lost the most prominent mod on the site, the ninja smiley is still there, there was the debacle with VGC that tooks weeks to get noticed, and the CAGcast gets more attention than the actual site or suggestion forum. The site is stagnant.

That's my feedback.
 
[quote name='GuilewasNK']Well we lost the most prominent mod on the site, the ninja smiley is still there, there was the debacle with VGC that tooks weeks to get noticed, and the CAGcast gets more attention than the actual site or suggestion forum. The site is stagnant.

That's my feedback.[/QUOTE]

Don't forget the motherfucking digg requests that break the whole site for everyone. This is only made worse because the people asking for diggs tend to be the same ones who make retarded complaints like "Gosh, this place isn't like it was when I first joined here!" Well of course not, motherfucker. You are digging it and bringing douchebags here.
 
Too many 'after GCO' and 'I'm-too-damn-lazy-to-read-the-weekly-ads-so-heres-another-thread' threads. Ruining the site, IMO.

New people are too anxious to post a new deal, thinking they might get repped like on FW to pay attention to the fact the deal has already been posted, or isn't a deal at all.
 
[quote name='CocheseUGA']Too many 'after GCO' and 'I'm-too-damn-lazy-to-read-the-weekly-ads-so-heres-another-thread' threads. Ruining the site, IMO.
[/QUOTE]

Thank you. Between that and "OMG THIS DEAL OF THE DAY SUCKS I HATE THE DOTD WHY DO THEY EVEN DO IT?" is everything that's wrong with the site IMHO.

There is absolutely no reason we need to have the same deals that are in the weekly ads posted again. "But I'd never see it in the weekly ads" say the complainers. If you're not reading weekly ads... weekly... you probably shouldn't be hanging out on a site called Cheap Ass Gamer.
 
Fixing the search function so it:
1) Works with words 3 characters or less.
2) Doesn't break most of the time using it with a memory error from vB.

Long-term wish:
Upgrade to 3.6.7 or 3.6.8 vB code for better stability.
 
Guile, Strell, Cochese, and shrike have raised issues I'm totally down with. Espcially the digg whoring. That drives me insane. edit: And a banned user thread would be nice. It would satisfy curiousity of those who don't understand why X was banned, he always seemed fine to me.




However, dragonreborn touched on two issues which are a) wrong and b) right. We need more men. Lots of 'em. And if you want to post a pic of yourself shirtless, go right ahead.
 
maybe its me, but it feels like lately cheapy has been really hands off was CAG, hoping it just runs on its own. I would like him to see him more involved, and possibly some changes that aren't just superficial.


this can't really be helped, but it really feels like there have been less deals lately, i dunno if they die quicker, stores are less likely to have good deals, or I am just missing them, but it seems like cheap ass gamer has turned more into gamer lately.

still like it here, better than most places, but those are my two cents.
 
[quote name='Ikohn4ever']maybe its me, but it feels like lately cheapy has been really hands off was CAG, hoping it just runs on its own. I would like him to see him more involved, and possibly some changes that aren't just superficial.[/quote]

I agree with all of that.
 
[quote name='Ikohn4ever']maybe its me, but it feels like lately cheapy has been really hands off was CAG, hoping it just runs on its own. I would like him to see him more involved, and possibly some changes that aren't just superficial.


this can't really be helped, but it really feels like there have been less deals lately, i dunno if they die quicker, stores are less likely to have good deals, or I am just missing them, but it seems like cheap ass gamer has turned more into gamer lately.

still like it here, better than most places, but those are my two cents.[/QUOTE]


Is that Emma Watson?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top