[quote name='neudog']I'm not up on import titles, but from what I've seen from current gen is that I would rather have SONY titles, so this really makes no difference besides the low pricepoint for the Wii.
Also I find it comicla how everyone keeps cutting at those of us who complain about the $50, yet they're part of CheapAssGamer
$50 can be stretched very far and it will in my case because I'm passing on launch. Nintendo knows that this might be the last push for Hardware, so they're going to try and make a larger profit this go around instead of providing the consistent pricing from other console launches. This is poor Marketing and anyone who has taken one Marketing class can attest to this. Good Marketing focuses on meeting the consumer's needs and providing a product at a reasonable price; in not doing so a marketer can not attain what they desire and that is the profit. Knowing Nintendo's history this is not reasonable and I hope they enjoy holding up the totem pole again this go around.[/quote]
Huh, the Wii will be the cheapest next-gen system on the market when it comes out, $50 or not.
Your comment about hardware is interesting speculation, but isn't rooted in sense: for one, game companies always take a loss in hardware. Economy of scale through the product life cycle is what ultimately drives hardware profits (if any) in the long run. Also, inflation would suggest that $250 is probably right in line with previous console releases--not to mention we have no idea how much Nintendo spent on R&D, let alone on producing this stuff, so who are we to judge how much this thing is supposed to be selling for?
Finally, remember too that marketing is just a tool of business. The bottom line is the bottom line and if that means the console needs to be sold at retail for $250, then so be it. Marketing's job is to make people believe that this price is appropriate and to make them want to buy it for that amount. It's when the marketers try to run the show that business gets messed up.