[quote name='Strell']This is like saying Nintendo is the only one that sunk the SNES-CD add-on.
I.e., a situation where a bunch of companies all got together and said they wanted XX% of profits, and no agreement could be made.
I don't know why everyone is so gungho about centering Nintendo out on this matter.
It has been said multiple times that the remake was in place and then someone - I forgot who was developing it - went to Nintendo for clearance, who told them no, BUT was sure to make it clear that they had no actual say in the matter.
It's like...if you wanted to TP someone's house, and you ask the neighbor, and the neighbor says they wouldn't enjoy it, and so you go home and get angry at the original person you were aiming for. Why should you care about what the neighbor had to say?
Same deal here. Nintendo apparently has no rights to anything - why did anyone ask them to begin with, and then not follow through afterward instead of giving them a hearty middle finger? There's big bucks to be made on a Goldeneye remake - you think people are going to sit by for no reason? Makes no sense.
And beyond ALL of this, there's been absolutely no definitive proof of a remake beyond rumors. None. No screenshots, no running engine, nothing. All that's shown up thus far is nothing but higher-res fanmade stuff, usually based on different gameplay engines (like Source).[/quote]
Fair enough. From all of the info I read, I gathered that it was a Nintendo snag. You mention that 'why wouldn't anyone even ask?'... because it IS Nintendo. Even if they have zero rights, Activision thought it would be nice to ask them, and they apparently said they'd prefer it not to. So, why not give them the middle finger? Because they're Nintendo, the company that is firmly in the lead and making butt-tons of money at the moment. Activision likes money, but not enough to potentially piss off Nintendo (who, oddly, seems unconcerned about *always* making money, as this very thread suggests) and, if I remember correctly, the 'no' word came from Iwata himself.
Ultimately, it's stupid to point fingers, but any that are there to point seem to all go back to Nintendo. MS, if it's true that they were pretty close to done with it, had everything to gain and so did Activision. One snag that I was never sure of was Doak who, if I remember correctly, created the engine. Not sure where his rights stand. The only person in ANY equation that would be losing out is Nintendo, which is why it seems logical to blame them. It might have been something as simple as they would've had to pay actors too much for their likeness, or that it got bogged down in the EA/Activision rights switchover, but both of those would have been fixed by now. The Nintendo thing... not so much.
The pictures that surfaced seemed real enough, and were the subject of an article in one of the official XBox magazines. Whether they screwed up is something I can't say, but I always thought it added some weight to them.
... anyway, I don't care who gets the blame, the fact remains that it seems we were REAL close to getting a madeover GoldenEye, and I hate that. To get so close and then get nothing, it makes people want to blame *someone*, you know? :lol: