Chris Jericho's wrestling topic

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote name='Francis']It'd be nice to see Regal,... do something. They aren't using him in Smackdown and if I had my way he'd be a main event level heel. Screw JBL, Regal should have his spot.

[/QUOTE]

QFT
 
Pretty major, and yet obvious Vengeance spoiler, courtesy of PWInsider.com

This should come as a shock to no one. Viewer's Choice Canada has pulled the verbiage from their website, which we posted earlier today, where they talked about DX reuniting at June's Vengeance PPV. I talked to two WWE sources who confirmed to me that that what was written on the Viewer's Choice website is indeed the current plan.
They also told me that WWE management was not happy that it was posted there, effectively letting the secret our early (though I think anyone who watched Raw recently could see that the reunion was going to happen).
Coming on the heels of WWE releasing the June 7 ECW vs. WWE special early, you would think that a better system of checks and balances would be implemented.
 
[quote name='Genocidal']Pretty major, and yet obvious Vengeance spoiler, courtesy of PWInsider.com

This should come as a shock to no one. Viewer's Choice Canada has pulled the verbiage from their website, which we posted earlier today, where they talked about DX reuniting at June's Vengeance PPV. I talked to two WWE sources who confirmed to me that that what was written on the Viewer's Choice website is indeed the current plan.
They also told me that WWE management was not happy that it was posted there, effectively letting the secret our early (though I think anyone who watched Raw recently could see that the reunion was going to happen).
Coming on the heels of WWE releasing the June 7 ECW vs. WWE special early, you would think that a better system of checks and balances would be implemented.
[/quote]

Oh God, yes!
I really, really hope it's all the members of DX (sides Chyna).
 
[quote name='Trakan']Oh God, yes!
I really, really hope it's all the members of DX (sides Chyna).
[/QUOTE]

I dunno

Sean (XPac) is a drunken joke. I'm not sure about the others but I don't think he'd be back
 
[quote name='RedvsBlue']I dunno

Sean (XPac) is a drunken joke. I'm not sure about the others but I don't think he'd be back
[/quote]

I'd be happy with just HHH, HBK, and the Outlaws, but I'd be kinda upset if it was just HHH and HBK.
 
[quote name='Trakan']
I'd be happy with just HHH, HBK, and the Outlaws, but I'd be kinda upset if it was just HHH and HBK.
[/quote]
The James Gang (Outlawz) are in TNA...
 
For those who aren't aware... this week's TNA Global Impact is now online @ TNAWrestling.com. It features the following:

- Samoa Joe vs AJ Styles from the Detroit house show (heavily clipped but nice to get to see the highlights).
- Team Canada vs Team USA from Xplosion.
- The same Alex Shelly bit from Impact last week.
- Some interview with some Aussie guy promoting TNA PPV back on in Australia.
- Hype for this Thursday's Impact including the Daniels/Styles vs AMW match for the NWA Tag titles.
- Preview of the Knockouts DVD. Let me just say that Gail Kim = :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: .....

http://www.tnawrestling.com/globalimpact/index.html

(It seems to be down at the momemt but it should be back up in a bit)
 
More TNA news.... here's an Shane Douglas interview that just got posted at TNAWrestling.com.

[quote name='TNAWrestling.com']OUTSIDE THE RING: SHANE DOUGLAS OVERCOMES HIS BIGGEST CHALLENGE

Shane Douglas’ stardom surpassed the woes that he endured away from the pro wrestling spotlight. Douglas was addicted to pain killers. He was prescribed Oxycontin to ease the pain of countless bumps, bruises and broken bones from a 24-year in-ring career. Doctors told him five years ago to take Oxycontin twice a day, but he eventually built a tolerance for – brace yourself – as many as 50 pills per day, at times taking 15 pills at once. “I was taking doses that probably should have killed me; that’s when I realized I could either continue down the path until something horrible happened, or make a stand. That was the hardest thing I’ve ever done in my life,” Douglas said.

In the first interview about his drug addiction, Shane Douglas spoke exclusively with Ross Forman about his self-admitted stint in an outpatient rehabilitation center and the “pure hell” he has endured over the past five months. He spoke candidly and openly. He offered advice for others – fellow wrestlers and fans – who might be in a similar situation.

By Ross Forman

When his second son was born last Dec. 6, Shane Douglas knew he had to be around them. He didn’t want to be another wrestling statistic: a performer who passed away early, like so many others, due to a drug addition.

“I would have hated for them to grow up with the stigma that their father died from an unintentional drug overdose,” he said.

So Douglas called rehabilitation centers and surfed the Internet for help. He ultimately contacted about 40 places before finding the help that he oh-so-desperately needed, and wanted.

“I knew I eventually was going to reach a point of no return, and the pills would have killed me,” Douglas said.

Douglas started seeing a pain doctor in Pittsburgh abut five years ago, and was prescribed Oxycontin. “It was miraculous,” Douglas said. “I’d take one pill and would all of a sudden feel like I was 20 years-old again. No pain. The joints felt great again. I was able to lift heavy (weights) again in the gym. I was wrestling with no problems.”

Problem was, Douglas never was informed that Oxycontin was highly addictive, and, Douglas had the mentality that the pills must be safe since they were prescribed by a doctor.

Less than a year after he started taking them, Douglas tried to stop, but couldn’t; he was hooked.

Finally, this past January, Douglas realized it was time to stop playing the drug-addiction game and get serious with his life. And not just for himself – but for my wife, his sons and for the fans.

Douglas left TNA in January – with the full blessing of TNA management, including company president Dixie Carter. He admitted himself to an outpatient rehabilitation center, checking his pride at the center’s front-door.

“Being in such a high-profile position, there never was an opportune time to take several months to get myself off the drug,” he said. “Even though I had ongoing pain issues, I knew the necessity to take Oxycontin like I was doing was not there anymore since I was not wrestling full-time anymore.”

TNA officials told Douglas to take off as much time as needed and, most important, that his job was not in jeopardy, that they were behind him 100 percent and his job would be there for him whenever he was ready to return.

“TNA offered support on every level,” Douglas added.

Douglas said the first four weeks of 2006, his withdrawal period, were “absolute hell.” He was vomiting almost every 10-to-15 minutes for weeks at the start. He had constant diarrhea, dehydration and “the worst flu you’ve ever had multiplied by 50.” Douglas ached from head to toe. He was nauseous and had absolutely no energy. “Just walking from the couch to the bathroom was a major chore, on par with climbing Mt. Everest,” he said.

“The thing that kept driving me was my family and my fans.”

Douglas has not had an Oxycontin pill since last Dec. 22 – and he has no plans to, even though, he admits, “my body still aches on a daily basis, and always will. But mentally, I feel tremendous. I know I don’t have to take pills to make it through the day.”

Douglas has had stints in all four major American promotions: WWE, WCW, ECW and TNA. He has endured six surgeries on his right elbow, two on his left elbow, three shoulder surgeries and multiple broken bones.

“I can’t tell you how many times I’d wake up in the middle of the night with tears in my eyes, heartbroken because I knew I was addicted. I was ashamed,” he said. “It was difficult to find help; I know that first-hand. But you need to find help.

“I just want to help others who may be in that same situation. And I really mean it. Don’t feel hopeless, because I did. Also, don’t feel ashamed that you have to hide it; we all have our faults and weaknesses.”

Douglas added: “Life after addiction is so much more fulfilling, so much more rewarding than the greatest high you’ve ever had from your addiction.”

Douglas said he next plans to quit using chewing tobacco.

“I was given the chance by TNA to keep this a personal matter, or, if I chose, to discuss it publicly,” Douglas said. “I always have been so open with the fans about my perspective about the business, so, I did not want to hide this and let people think that I was ashamed of it.

“I want everyone in the locker room to know that TNA’s support is one of the reasons I am at where I am today. Don’t hide it if you have an addiction; don’t be ashamed. Come forward and get help; the company will support you.”[/quote]
 
Oxy's make me quesy...

Great news about Shane though, I was wondering what happened to him the other day while watching Impact... Hopefully he'll return to doing interviews soon, maybe even wrestle a match? (Probably not..)
 
I'm confused at something. There seems to be a general level of annoyance at the DX reformation teasing that HHH and HBK are constantly doing. Why? Some of you fellas are contradicting yourselves. You say you want, good, slow builds on major angles, but now that they are trying that with DX, you shit all over it and demand instant gratificcation. You can't have it both ways.
 
[quote name='AdamInPlaidum']I'm confused at something. There seems to be a general level of annoyance at the DX reformation teasing that HHH and HBK are constantly doing. Why? Some of you fellas are contradicting yourselves. You say you want, good, slow builds on major angles, but now that they are trying that with DX, you shit all over it and demand instant gratificcation. You can't have it both ways.[/QUOTE]

The difference is that we keep seeing the same thing over and over in regards with the reformation of DX. You can only run with the same bag of tricks for so long before people become bored with it. And in this case the constant teasing of the reformation can only go on for so long before people get tired of it and start booing and doing "boring" chants.
 
[quote name='Francis']Lord we'll be hearing plenty of boring chants if they bring back Sean Waltman.[/QUOTE]

You know Waltman is capable of delievering a good performance in the ring when paired up with the right person to work with. Watch Waltman vs Jerry Lynn from Sacrifice 2005. Very good match between the two. Too bad Waltman has pretty much burned his bridges with TNA (or at least it seems like it) as it felt like as if match could of been the beginning of a good fued between the two.
 
[quote name='PhrostByte']
The James Gang (Outlawz) are in TNA...
[/quote]

I know, I know. This is the shit I grew up with though. I have some hope. :lol:
 
My only concern is that if they bring DX back, who will they feud with? Do we really need HBK and HHH going over everyone on Raw again?

I would also prefer at least one other stable besides the damn Odd Squad.
 
[quote name='GuilewasNK']My only concern is that if they bring DX back, who will they feud with? Do we really need HBK and HHH going over everyone on Raw again?

I would also prefer at least one other stable besides the damn Odd Squad.[/QUOTE]

Heres my concern about DX. I loved DX back in the late 90's. The Attitude Era was a really creative time for wrestling and thats why DX was such a success. Not to mention Professional Wrestling in general. It was perfect timing. The biggest mistake people make in the wrestling business is trying to recreate magic by recylcing ideas. Its not going to work, if the WWE wants to be successful again they are going to have to come up with something new and not something that worked almost a decade ago. Id love for nothing more than to see HBK become a heel again as i dont think he works as a face but DX is not the answer. I'll be the first to admit that when the DX chops started i marked out but the longer i thought about it, i really think its not going to work and will only hurt things.

Its the same thing with bringing back ECW. It was another classic case of right timing and it worked. Bringing back some old ECW wrestlers isn't going to recapture what ECW was able to do to the wrestling business.

Vince McMahon needs to stop trying to recycle what worked in the past. Wrestling fans want innovation and something new to get excited about. More than anything i want to see a decrease in storylines and more wrestling. I want to see wrestlers being creative in the ring again like they were during the attitude era. I dont want to be able to call every move during a match before it happens because every wrestler only does the same set moves. I want to see matches that tell a story instead of storylines hand feeding it to me. You dont see matches like that anymore and i think its a lost art of wrestling.

Im a strong believer that when Vince McMahon bought up WCW and ECW it hurt professional wreslting more than a lot of people realize. He killed off competetion and that always hurts the overall product when you dont have someone on your coat tails trying to take your spot. Also you cant expect to make money off a brand that you complete trashed for years during the monday night wars. I also believe that McMahon blatent hatred for being associated with "pro wrestling" hurts the business as well. The fact the the name of the company went from World Wrestling Federation to World Wrestling Entertainment. Sorry for my off topic rant.
 
[quote name='onetrackmind']Heres my concern about DX. I loved DX back in the late 90's. The Attitude Era was a really creative time for wrestling and thats why DX was such a success. Not to mention Professional Wrestling in general. It was perfect timing. The biggest mistake people make in the wrestling business is trying to recreate magic by recylcing ideas. Its not going to work, if the WWE wants to be successful again they are going to have to come up with something new and not something that worked almost a decade ago. Id love for nothing more than to see HBK become a heel again as i dont think he works as a face but DX is not the answer. I'll be the first to admit that when the DX chops started i marked out but the longer i thought about it, i really think its not going to work and will only hurt things. [/quote]

Someone should send a memo to TNA about the whole recycling ideas bit.

Its the same thing with bringing back ECW. It was another classic case of right timing and it worked. Bringing back some old ECW wrestlers isn't going to recapture what ECW was able to do to the wrestling business.

I don't know, I'm getting that feeling that ECW is also going to be a way for WWE to get more wrestlers some face time, that usually get buried in the RAW / Smackdown roster. People like Regal, as was mentioned before, possibly, and maybe some OVW talent. Plus, maybe it will FINALLY give RVD that gigantic push he deserves.

Vince McMahon needs to stop trying to recycle what worked in the past. Wrestling fans want innovation and something new to get excited about. More than anything i want to see a decrease in storylines and more wrestling. I want to see wrestlers being creative in the ring again like they were during the attitude era. I dont want to be able to call every move during a match before it happens because every wrestler only does the same set moves. I want to see matches that tell a story instead of storylines hand feeding it to me. You dont see matches like that anymore and i think its a lost art of wrestling.

Yea, I do get what you mean, people like RVD is a three trick pony, his move list consists of the rolling thunder, the leap off the turnbuckle, and throwing some guy out of the ring and jumping on him. He hits these same spots EVERY MATCH and I can predict them. That's why I'm hoping him going to the new ECW brand will help him.

Other people I can think of that run the same shit over and over again are Ric Flair and Kane.

Im a strong believer that when Vince McMahon bought up WCW and ECW it hurt professional wreslting more than a lot of people realize. He killed off competetion and that always hurts the overall product when you dont have someone on your coat tails trying to take your spot. Also you cant expect to make money off a brand that you complete trashed for years during the monday night wars. I also believe that McMahon blatent hatred for being associated with "pro wrestling" hurts the business as well. The fact the the name of the company went from World Wrestling Federation to World Wrestling Entertainment. Sorry for my off topic rant.

Vince had to change the name because of a lawsuit. I mean, he would have competition if TNA would EVER STEP UP TO THE PLATE.
 
I don't know, I'm getting that feeling that ECW is also going to be a way for WWE to get more wrestlers some face time, that usually get buried in the RAW / Smackdown roster. People like Regal, as was mentioned before, possibly, and maybe some OVW talent. Plus, maybe it will FINALLY give RVD that gigantic push he deserves.

I dont disagree but i feel that the WWE feels that by bringing back ECW name sake is enough to bury TNA. I would love to see RVD finally get a deserving push. But the WWE is not going to be able to recreate what ECW was able to do, nor have the rabid fan base they once had.

Yea, I do get what you mean, people like RVD is a three trick pony, his move list consists of the rolling thunder, the leap off the turnbuckle, and throwing some guy out of the ring and jumping on him. He hits these same spots EVERY MATCH and I can predict them. That's why I'm hoping him going to the new ECW brand will help him. Other people I can think of that run the same shit over and over again are Ric Flair and Kane.

Everyone is basically a three trick pony. I shit you not during raw, smackdown, or a PPV i can literally call the move before they even do it. HHH, Cena, Big Show, Edge, HBK, Boogyman, Spirt Squad, Angle... i could go on for days. Back in the late 90's wrestlers were getting really creative with spots and new moves. I think i remember the WWE really limiting what the guys do in the ring, so im not necessarily blaming them... but honestly the matches are no different than what ive been seeing over the course of the last couple of years.

Vince had to change the name because of a lawsuit. I mean, he would have competition if TNA would EVER STEP UP TO THE PLATE.

You kinda missed my point here, i know why they changed the name but if you look at the new name you can see its lacking the word "wrestling". Its no mystery that Vince does not like to have his product associated to "pro wrestling" he calls it "sports entertainment" for a reason. I think if Vince could ahve it his way hes eliminate most of the actually wrestling out of the way and run skits and promos all the time.
 
I agree with your last sentence otm. If there's anything on WWE programming that seems the least important, it's the matches themselves.

I was walking my dog yesterday and it occurred to me that people are falsely crying foul on RVD. They have been for years. The guy was the Triple H of ECW, just like Jeff Jarrett was the Triple H of TNA, just like Hulk Hogan was the Hulk Hogan of the WWF and WCW. RVD never wanted to job, RVD always wanted to get his spots in, and RVD was a primadonna at the time. While I think he deserves to be at the top of the card, I don't think he is completely deserving of sympathy, knowing that, when he finally gets a shot at the top, he'll behave in much the same way as the guys we bitch about.

I also had another thought about ECW. Can anyone really name that many awesome *wrestling* matches? Our discussion about New Jack's matches the other day made me think if the rose-colored glasses of hindsight make us ignore the fact that ECW matches had a lot of garbage wrestling in them. Moreover, they had a lot of forgettable matches and wrestlers (more or less the first hour of any PPV they had). They did offer a greater proportion of excellent wrestling, I suppose, and they didn't seem to commit the capital crime of having great wrestlers and either not using them or undercutting them by disallowing certain moves (which the WWE has been guilty of doing since the inception of the cruiserweight/light heavyweight title). In addition, they gave ample time to a lot of the matches, whereas WWE shows seem to have a rapid-fire series of 7-minute matches for the first hour of a PPV, and only really showcase good, long wrestling matches for the last 90 minutes or so (which then, of course, means that the same guys always get PPV time and the same guys get the PPV short shrift).

I suppose my point is that, while ECW had excellent wrestling, the major difference between them and the WWE was that few talents can ever say they were misused or held back in ECW on the scale that they are in the WWE. The difference between the two is more about giving and using opportunities versus reliance on proven winners and an unwillingness to utilize talents on hand.

I also have begun to watch Raw thinking of the "Saturday Night Live" format. They start off almost always with a long monologue followed by a series of what are essentially "skits" (whether matches or not) that rarely last more than 6 minutes in toto. It certainly resembles vaudeville more than a sporting event these days.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']I agree with your last sentence otm. If there's anything on WWE programming that seems the least important, it's the matches themselves.

I was walking my dog yesterday and it occurred to me that people are falsely crying foul on RVD. They have been for years. The guy was the Triple H of ECW, just like Jeff Jarrett was the Triple H of TNA, just like Hulk Hogan was the Hulk Hogan of the WWF and WCW. RVD never wanted to job, RVD always wanted to get his spots in, and RVD was a primadonna at the time. While I think he deserves to be at the top of the card, I don't think he is completely deserving of sympathy, knowing that, when he finally gets a shot at the top, he'll behave in much the same way as the guys we bitch about.

I also had another thought about ECW. Can anyone really name that many awesome *wrestling* matches? Our discussion about New Jack's matches the other day made me think if the rose-colored glasses of hindsight make us ignore the fact that ECW matches had a lot of garbage wrestling in them. Moreover, they had a lot of forgettable matches and wrestlers (more or less the first hour of any PPV they had). They did offer a greater proportion of excellent wrestling, I suppose, and they didn't seem to commit the capital crime of having great wrestlers and either not using them or undercutting them by disallowing certain moves (which the WWE has been guilty of doing since the inception of the cruiserweight/light heavyweight title). In addition, they gave ample time to a lot of the matches, whereas WWE shows seem to have a rapid-fire series of 7-minute matches for the first hour of a PPV, and only really showcase good, long wrestling matches for the last 90 minutes or so (which then, of course, means that the same guys always get PPV time and the same guys get the PPV short shrift).

I suppose my point is that, while ECW had excellent wrestling, the major difference between them and the WWE was that few talents can ever say they were misused or held back in ECW on the scale that they are in the WWE. The difference between the two is more about giving and using opportunities versus reliance on proven winners and an unwillingness to utilize talents on hand.

I also have begun to watch Raw thinking of the "Saturday Night Live" format. They start off almost always with a long monologue followed by a series of what are essentially "skits" (whether matches or not) that rarely last more than 6 minutes in toto. It certainly resembles vaudeville more than a sporting event these days.[/QUOTE]

I knew you'd have my back on atleast some of my argument since it seems like more times than not were in agreement. But back to what you were saying about the quality of wrestlers in ECW at the time, i agree that there were a lot of wrestlers who werent as good as we remember them to be and i think that really boils down to the fact that when ECW hit and had the cult following that they had it was wrestling like we had never seen it. Hardcore wrestling was pretty much introduced to the mainstream when ECW got popular. Take for instance the Sandman, hes a terrible wrestler and couldnt work a legitimate match even if he had to, but the fans ate him up because what he was doing was "new"
 
The conspiracy theorist in me has been contemplating for some time that this is yet another way to not give RVD the huge push that people have been wanting him to get. Sure, he's going to be a/the top star in this new ECW, but look at what it's got so far: a web show that's going to air in the place that Velocity had.

RVD may be comparable to Trips/Jarrett, but much like what Trips has done, he's been over and entertained people (I won't comment on Jarrett since I don't watch TNA, although I haven't heard too many positives). Van Dam, although he may have been a prima donna, really was one of the cornerstone guys of that company in my opinion that could get away with it. Should he have acted that way if he did? Probably not. It's hard to argue that RVD is one of the first names that comes up when people think of ECW though, and you could easily make a highlight reel or two of just matches with RVD. While part of it has to do with him being lucky to have good talent to work with, I don't think anyone would say that he's been carried to all the good matches he's had since his run began with ECW.

Hm. This was only supposed to be a sentence or two but I started rambling. Oh well.
 
You guys have some good points. ECW did at times have great wrestling, some of the most innovative stuff at the time. Of course these matches were, like all good matches, rare. Most of the time you had something like Balls Mahoney vs. Ian Rotten beating each other with wrenches and plastic babies. On the other hand you did have a lot of the Mexican wrestlers hit the big time because of Heyman and his organization. Without ECW, we probably wouldn't have guys like Juvy, Super Crazy, Mysterio, etc... Look at Mysterio now. He's WCW champion (I think... he hasn't lost that belt to Orton yet right?)

Even though ECW did put on a great show at times, I think the only reason anyone ever gave it serious consideration was because of RVD. RVD basically brought the company into the mainstream. His matches with Sabu during the beginning of his ECW carrear got people hooked. Then he had the fued with Jerry Lynn. In my opinion, those two matches were some of the best ever. But that was like 10 years ago, RVD's gotten older and I don't think he has much left in him (probably why he's been "toned down"). Same with Sabu.. and Lynn.. and most of the people that worked in ECW. Hell half of them are dead... :(

They should blow RVD up to megastar status before he's still got some fight left in him... It's better to burn out than fade away.
 
[quote name='Genocidal']The conspiracy theorist in me has been contemplating for some time that this is yet another way to not give RVD the huge push that people have been wanting him to get. Sure, he's going to be a/the top star in this new ECW, but look at what it's got so far: a web show that's going to air in the place that Velocity had.

RVD may be comparable to Trips/Jarrett, but much like what Trips has done, he's been over and entertained people (I won't comment on Jarrett since I don't watch TNA, although I haven't heard too many positives). Van Dam, although he may have been a prima donna, really was one of the cornerstone guys of that company in my opinion that could get away with it. Should he have acted that way if he did? Probably not. It's hard to argue that RVD is one of the first names that comes up when people think of ECW though, and you could easily make a highlight reel or two of just matches with RVD. While part of it has to do with him being lucky to have good talent to work with, I don't think anyone would say that he's been carried to all the good matches he's had since his run began with ECW.

Hm. This was only supposed to be a sentence or two but I started rambling. Oh well.[/quote]

I wonder if RVD goes on to win the belt from JBL at the ONS PPV, if the WWE will use this as a way to incorporate WWE guys into the ECW brand. Maybe as a way to continue the ECW vs WWE storyline after the ONS PPV.

The way I think it will play out is that RVD will beat JBL for the title at ONS, and then just start using the ECW Championship instead of the World Championship. Maybe have RVD throw the World Championship into the trash, and then have Heyman come out and give him the ECW title. Then maybe JBL can say since it was an ECW sanctioned match, and not a WWE match, there was no way he could lose the World Title. Then JBL could go back to Smackdown with the title until Batista comes back...

Or if the WWE wanted to do one of their "out there" story lines, they could have JBL do a promo that shows him running into some bums (or Duke Drose) who found the World title in the garbage, and then have JBL beat them (or him) up and "win" the title back. I think a squash match with JBL/Drose would be funny.

Enough with my crazy ideas. If RVD does win the World title at ONS, how does everyone else see Smackdown getting their belt back?
 
[quote name='RawisJericho']I wonder if RVD goes on to win the belt from JBL at the ONS PPV, if the WWE will use this as a way to incorporate WWE guys into the ECW brand. Maybe as a way to continue the ECW vs WWE storyline after the ONS PPV.

The way I think it will play out is that RVD will beat JBL for the title at ONS, and then just start using the ECW Championship instead of the World Championship. Maybe have RVD throw the World Championship into the trash, and then have Heyman come out and give him the ECW title. Then maybe JBL can say since it was an ECW sanctioned match, and not a WWE match, there was no way he could lose the World Title. Then JBL could go back to Smackdown with the title until Batista comes back...

Or if the WWE wanted to do one of their "out there" story lines, they could have JBL do a promo that shows him running into some bums (or Duke Drose) who found the World title in the garbage, and then have JBL beat them (or him) up and "win" the title back. I think a squash match with JBL/Drose would be funny.

Enough with my crazy ideas. If RVD does win the World title at ONS, how does everyone else see Smackdown getting their belt back?[/quote]

Personally. I see him losing to Cena for the WWE title.
 
Main Event For ECW One Night Stand PPV Revealed
The Wrestling Observer Newsletter is reporting that the decision is final, and John Cena vs. RVD will be the main event for the ECW One Night Stand PPV this year.

WWE will likely be using this opportunity to finally turn Cena heel, after getting booed by fans for months.

With the way things have been going lately regarding plans for the new ECW, things could change before the event. Keep checking back to ECWWrestlingNews.com to make sure you have the latest.

Well, there goes my theory...

WWE has been trying very hard as of late to land ECW a TV deal on the USA network. Many believe that it will eventually happen.

Sources indicate that WWE knows that they really need ECW to have its own TV slot instead of an internet show if they want it to succeed.

Here is the current group of talent that is expected to be a part of the new ECW project that will debut next month.

Rob Van Dam, The Sandman, Tommy Dreamer, Sabu, Al Snow, Axl Rotten, Balls Mahoney, Francine, Jazz, C.W. Anderson, Little Guido and Tony Mamaluke are expected to be full time performers for the ECW project.

Terry Funk, Masato Tanaka, Yoshihiro Tajiri, Mikey Whipwreck and Joel Gertner will be making part time appearances in ECW.

Several developmental wrestlers from Ohio Valley Wrestling and Deep South Wrestling will eventually be used for this new ECW project. CM Punk is one individual who is line for a big push in the new ECW.

Other wrestlers who may be brought to ECW include Roadkill, Kid Kash, Super Crazy, Justin Credible (if he doesn't stay with the MTV project) and Lance Storm (he may work select dates, but not full-time.).

The play-by-play announcer will be Joey Styles. The ring announcer will be Steven DeAngelis. The bookers will be Paul Heyman, Tommy Dreamer and possibly Smackdown's Ed Koskey on a part time basis.
 
Good to hear about Punk. My question: What the hell is Taz(z) gonna do? He better be involved. Having Taz in WWE but not ECW is just a crime.
 
[quote name='PhrostByte']Good to hear about Punk. My question: What the hell is Taz(z) gonna do? He better be involved. Having Taz in WWE but not ECW is just a crime.[/QUOTE]

Tazz declined an offer to wrestle... supposedly hes happy not wrestling and doesnt want to risk hurting his neck
 
[quote name='onetrackmind']Tazz declined an offer to wrestle... supposedly hes happy not wrestling and doesnt want to risk hurting his neck[/quote]

Can't say I blame him. Doesn't he have a radio show with Cole? Man, that's a great job to have.
 
[quote name='GuilewasNK']Can't say I blame him. Doesn't he have a radio show with Cole? Man, that's a great job to have.[/quote]

I think they only had 6 episodes on Stern's station on Sirius radio... If they got picked up for more, I'd love to hear it.

Also, I don't care if Taz wrestles. I just want him to be involved in the product somehow. I don't know if he should announce... cuz that's Styles' job. But, SOMETHING!

Taz = ECW just as much as RVD = ECW to me.
 
[quote name='onetrackmind']Tazz declined an offer to wrestle... supposedly hes happy not wrestling and doesnt want to risk hurting his neck[/QUOTE]

He's also a bit of a tubmonkey. Can't say I blame him, as there's no impetus for him to be in ring shape. OTOH, he really looks like he's let himself go as much as he can without people saying "oh, Taz has really let himself go."

That being said, a Taz/Sabu rematch would be fantastic, and god knows they only have a couple years to do it right before it becomes like the WCW Piper/Hogan "Age in the Cage" feud.
 
I had a feeling since the talk of the rebirth of ECW that we would see CM Punk be used there. It makes sense too since honestly can you see CM Punk even mixing in remotely at all on either the RAW or Smackdown brands? He would be totally lost on the RAW brand, and over on Smackdown he would be probably fueding with whatever the latest 80s cartoon gimmick of the moment it is. Yet over on the ECW side finally mainstream America can get a real chance to see why CM Punk is just That Damn Great!

This ECW rebirth is going to work. The more I hear the more I'm liking it. :D
 
Guess that means that Punk's title reign is gonna be short, as he just beat Brent Alright/Gunner Scott for the OVW Heavyweight title.
 
The good thing about this ECW "launch" is that no matter how it turns out, I think it has a lot of people at least interested in how it turns out. Which will hopefully result in a lot of people also tuning in to find out how everything plays out.

I'm really excited about CM Punk getting a push in ECW. The guy is talented, and it'd be a shame to see him get the same half-hearted "push" that guys like Kendrick and London get in WWE.

If WWE plays it out correctly, they could start pulling some of the good workers from ROH (like Aries and Strong, etc.), and then where does TNA go from there? Yeah, they can keep pulling in the senior citizens from the WCW days, but the best part about TNA is the actual wrestling (well, the good wrestling, anyway), and without the talent from ROH, can TNA put on a quality show? I don't know, but I guess we'll see.
 
ECW's women's division is the same size as the WWE's at the moment. I gotta love Jazz coming back, and I hope she brings Rodney Mack with her. He would fit in very well in an ECW show, and IIRC, he did spend a minute in ECW years ago.
 
My greatest fear is that the whole ECW resurrection bombs but takes a substantial portion of TNA ratings in the process... I mean if you think about it, that could be the whole reason for Vince bringing ECW back.

IMHO, TNA over the past 2 or 3 years has either come close surpassing or has completely surpassed the legacy of ECW. Call me a fanboy if you will, but like many of you my favorite period in pro wrestling was the Attitude era (WWF, WCW, ECW wars) and ever since then the only thing that has caught my attention has been the X-Divsion. Oh yeah, some of the hardcore matches were decent too. Sabu/Abyss comes to mind.
 
[quote name='PhrostByte']My greatest fear is that the whole ECW resurrection bombs but takes a substantial portion of TNA ratings in the process... I mean if you think about it, that could be the whole reason for Vince bringing ECW back.[/QUOTE]

As long as the ECW program is on at a different night or even at differnet time it shouldn't affect TNA's ratings at all. I will certainly give the rebirth of ECW a chance... it should be damn good. :D
 
[quote name='Demolition Man']As long as the ECW program is on at a different night or even at differnet time it shouldn't affect TNA's ratings at all. I will certainly give the rebirth of ECW a chance... it should be damn good. :D[/quote]
Well, it'll hurt the people that were looking for "the next big thing". TNA got to second place by using the positive marketing strategies that WCW and ECW employed, and attempting to minimize the mistakes of the companies. So far I think they've been pretty damn successful. But now Vince stole Sabu... and he's entering ECW into a market where it will already have a competitor. TNA may not completely be following ECW's model, but that's a good thing. That's why they're still in business...

I'm definitely gonna give the new ECW a chance. I was a huge fan when it was still around and I thought ONS was one of the best PPV's in recent times. Maybe just for the nostalgia factor... I can't wait for ONS2, WWE vs. ECW, and whatever else they have planned.
 
[quote name='2Fast']Anyone else think Sting's partner at Sacrifice will be Jeff Hardy?[/QUOTE]

The only thing I know about next week's Impact is in fact that Sting reveals his partner to be none other than... ready for a bombshell..... no I know you are.....

... its Samoa Joe. In fact even without knowing that it was pretty obvious to me after the staredown from last week's Impact.
 
[quote name='PhrostByte']My greatest fear is that the whole ECW resurrection bombs but takes a substantial portion of TNA ratings in the process... I mean if you think about it, that could be the whole reason for Vince bringing ECW back.

IMHO, TNA over the past 2 or 3 years has either come close surpassing or has completely surpassed the legacy of ECW. Call me a fanboy if you will, but like many of you my favorite period in pro wrestling was the Attitude era (WWF, WCW, ECW wars) and ever since then the only thing that has caught my attention has been the X-Divsion. Oh yeah, some of the hardcore matches were decent too. Sabu/Abyss comes to mind.[/QUOTE]

Actually thats the exact reason McMhaon is bringing ECW back, to complete full on with TNA
 
ncie to see ecw.com shaping up... hope they keep adding profiles..

anyways it just wont feel the same without their entrance songs... man thats gonna suck
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top