[quote name='ihadFG']Length for length's sake is irrelevant. I can understand it coming into the equation if you are limited in the amount of games that you want to play or you are only able to get absorbed into long games, but I don't think length should even enter into the equation when reviewing/scoring a game, which is where a lot of gamers tend to disagree with me (not saying you are one of them though).
[/quote]
That I agree with. Quality is what matters in scoring a game. I don't write reviews of things ever personally. I just casually chat about things I'm playing or reading or watching. I don't give a rat's ass about other's opinions on games, movies etc. so I don't bother writing reviews etc. as that would be hypocritical.
Agreed. As I said I just tend to prefer genres that by nature offer a lot of hours of gameplay--WRPGs and FPS games with online modes.
There's no reason for say a simple action game etc. to be very long as those get tedious fast IMO. I just don't tend to like those types of games so I'm more drawn to longer games due to genre preference.
Well, most people have a limited amount of income and need to buy enough games to fill their gaming time. A 40 hour game fills more time than a 10 hour game. So I can understand that viewpoint.
I don't share that viewpoint personally, as I can pretty much afford to buy all the games that interest me these days, finding time and motivation to play them all is the challenge!
But I still prefer longer games for the stories and other things inherent in them as I said before. So I just play 5-7 games or so a year as I'll have stretches where one WRPG is all I play for 3 or 4 months and so on.
[/quote]
That I agree with. Quality is what matters in scoring a game. I don't write reviews of things ever personally. I just casually chat about things I'm playing or reading or watching. I don't give a rat's ass about other's opinions on games, movies etc. so I don't bother writing reviews etc. as that would be hypocritical.
Additionally, even if someone does prefer longer games, that still doesn't justify complaining when a game is too short, as long as the short length is appropriate for the game.
Agreed. As I said I just tend to prefer genres that by nature offer a lot of hours of gameplay--WRPGs and FPS games with online modes.
There's no reason for say a simple action game etc. to be very long as those get tedious fast IMO. I just don't tend to like those types of games so I'm more drawn to longer games due to genre preference.
"I'm sure this game is fantastic, but I can't justify spending full price on a 10 hour game. I'll wait for it to hit $20." from someone who would gladly pay full price for a 40 hour game that is not as high in quality and they wouldn't enjoy as much as the short game. I find this philosophy frustrating.
Well, most people have a limited amount of income and need to buy enough games to fill their gaming time. A 40 hour game fills more time than a 10 hour game. So I can understand that viewpoint.
I don't share that viewpoint personally, as I can pretty much afford to buy all the games that interest me these days, finding time and motivation to play them all is the challenge!
But I still prefer longer games for the stories and other things inherent in them as I said before. So I just play 5-7 games or so a year as I'll have stretches where one WRPG is all I play for 3 or 4 months and so on.