[quote name='daroga']Places couldn't handle that there just might be a game better than OoT so scored it lower to bring down the average!!!
Or, some place gave it a 90% which modified the average just enough to bring it a few 10ths under OoT.

[/quote]
Yeah, it's kind of absurd to compare and compile ratings that work on different scales. Some sites give scores out of 100, some give scores out of 10, allowing for fractions, and some just give scores out of 10. So when it gets converted, a 90% isn't quite as pretty as a 9/10, because on the percentage scale, it looks as if there are 10 increments in which the game could have improved when in reality there is only one.
That being said, 9/10, 90%, 9.75, or whatever you use, all of those translate into great game and I doubt anyone refuses to buy a game because it got a 9/10 instead of a 10/10.
Like the folks on X-Play said defending their 5-point, no-fraction rating system, you don't need a '.5' to tell you that a game that got a 1 or a 2 is probably going to suck, or that a game that got a 4 or a 5 is good.
And it's stupid to compare a compilation of a current game's ratings to a compilation of ratings for a game that came out 10 years ago; reviewers and standards are all different.